Random circumcision thoughts
-
Revenant — 1 year ago(June 01, 2024 03:23 PM)
Because some weird Christian cereal company owner (Kellogg) wanted to keep boys from masturbating, and it became the norm in the US from his efforts. Religion is so often used to justify the worst ****in ****.
-
/. — 1 year ago(June 01, 2024 07:04 PM)
US circumcises because men have a hygiene problem whether they admit it or not and most US women aren’t interested in uncut men stinky or not. There is also the problem with the tearing of the skin during intercourse from some uncut penises. I had to do mine when I was 43. It took forever to heal. Once it did I was happy I had done it.
My password is password -
ToastedCheese — 1 year ago(June 04, 2024 05:08 AM)
In the US it is performed for medical profit with a fallacious caveat surrounding it about being for healthcare. Before that, it was just religious custom and if a male didn’t have his foreskin removed, he wouldn’t go to heaven when he died.
Pervert creepy doctors and religious nutjobs, keep your pedo hands of little boy penises. He can make that decision himself when he’s 18 and over.
Norman! What did you put in my tea? -
Pandora — 1 year ago(June 04, 2024 06:19 AM)
Pervert creepy doctors and religious nutjobs, keep your pedo hands of little boy penises. He can make that decision himself when he’s 18 and over.
Agree with this. I've read stories where the doctors are basically booking the baby in for his genital mutilation the moment he pops out and that the parents go along with it because they have been sold the lie that it's necessary when all it really does is line the pockets of the doctors. -
ToastedCheese — 1 year ago(June 05, 2024 12:28 AM)
Exactly!
It is claimed that it is supposed to limit the risk of sexually transmitted diseases. Majority of males in the world are uncut.
Europe has double the population of the US, largely uncut, yet the abhorrent genital mutilation of baby boys is more prevalent in the US and according to the last stats I read, the US has one of the highest rates of HIV in the world.
Norman! What did you put in my tea? -
Pandora — 1 year ago(June 01, 2024 05:41 PM)
Purely from a basic survival point of view it seems kind of a stupid thing to do. The foreskin is there to protect so why get rid of it and make the schlong more vulnerable
And Juan said that he feels sorry for men that will never know what it is like to have a fully formed penis
-
-
Dazed — 1 year ago(June 04, 2024 04:08 PM)
How can a person who is circumcised know how it feels to not be circumcised?
The only thing they don't experience is head cheese, which can be hard to clean.
How is it hard to clean ffs? Most men seem to know how to adequately clean their penis without resorting to mutilation.
You stupid fuckers, you know who you are.
