What a disaster Bill C-10 Please!
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — YPF
petapepa — 17 years ago(June 13, 2008 08:31 AM)
It's unbelievable that the Canadian government actually allows this kind of pornography into the public theatres. Back in the good ole days, the only place to see this seamy drivel would be in a XXX theatre or maybe one of those peep show places they used to have in big cities like Saskatoon where you would pay some money for 2 1/2 minutes of DEBAUCHERY! Thank the good Lord for Bill C-10. It's about time the government steps in to protect the public from these types of horrific films! I of course haven't seen it yet but I certainly can't wait for Prime Minister Harper to step in and do something about this travesty.
-
napkinbob-1 — 17 years ago(June 13, 2008 11:44 AM)
You're an idiot. If you don't want to see it, then simply don't go to it. The public can speak for themselves and make their own decsions on what movie they want to see. And also, there are far worse movies out there in terms of the sexual content. You only see boobs, there is nothing gratutious. Get a life.
Are you watching closely? -
shmeegie — 17 years ago(June 13, 2008 05:11 PM)
Yeah. What's next? Is the government going to step in and tell us what to read too? Maybe they should get rid of all those naughty mags that you probably read too, right? Maybe they should tell us how to eat, sleep and poop too!
-
vazandrew — 17 years ago(June 13, 2008 09:56 PM)
exactly, and like the previous poster said you hardly see anything
there have been some mainstream sex comedies with full frontal..this doesn't have even that
so why are people going so crazy..because of the title?
go watch the movie first, it's actually quite good and has real stories involved
all unknown actors from what i could tell (don't quote me on that though)
anyway, just get a grip -
carefreeblue — 17 years ago(July 14, 2008 03:11 PM)
Pornography? hardly. I can't point out tons of movies that are much worse than this, at least this puts some meaning behind the sex scenes while most movies just have it because in this day and age there has to be a sex scene.
-
colan — 17 years ago(June 14, 2008 12:11 PM)
So I'm guessing you've never actually SEEN the movie, just another kneejerk asshat from the conservative 'right' (which will always mean wrong) who's there to try to be the arbitrator of supposed "moral" [sic] compass, usually with the hypocritic oath.
This movie has no real frontal or other type of blatant nudity unlike many other mainstream movies, and it's message is sex isn't as casual as one things, it actually has heart something you right wingers lack, including a soul, a conscience to answer for, etc -
sweiland75 — 17 years ago(June 14, 2008 07:59 PM)
I hope you're joking because, otherwise, you sound like an idiot.
http://www.savemoonlight.com -
Saint_Christobel — 17 years ago(June 20, 2008 11:34 AM)
Sorry but PM Harper is too busy bending over for George W Bush too care about what a movie title is.
It's Me!
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=SaintChristobel -
Meven_Stoffat — 17 years ago(June 30, 2008 10:15 PM)
This isn't a porn movie
It's rated 15 in the UK, and here where I live it's rated 18A. I'm 16, I saw the movie, and thought it was hilarious. It's a great movie and you won't be able to stop laughing your butt off.
"Trapped in a web, but I cut the threads, show you the gates of tomorrow." - Iron Maiden -
rodsta69 — 17 years ago(July 14, 2008 02:01 AM)
There's actually very little nudity in the movie believe it or not. Before you go campaigning against something, you should know what you're talking about.
And who are you to dictate what other people are allowed to see? If you don't want to see it, the answer is pretty simple. Don't. That's it. No one is making you.