Saying that Commando is in any way, shape or form better than Taken seems plain weird to me. Taken is much better than C
-
milstar — 10 years ago(July 18, 2015 02:16 AM)
I dunno, man. I'm just sayin there are lousier and similar movies than Taken, but to have almost 8 rating is rather odd to me. I mean, for an action movie, it really has to be something special and if I dare to say - unforgettable. For example, if you watched The Boondock Saints which also holds 7.9 is even more bizarre for me, for me that's VERY overrated. Arnie's Commando has 6.7 (I think) and what the hell? Arnie is Arnie, it's OK. T2 probably has the highest rating - 8.5, and for a good reason. Die Hard - 8.3 and I love that movie too.
When I mentioned action flicks from 80s, I just wanted to say, no matter how crazy it may sound - I am completely enthralled by them. I love the style, music score and they usually don't demand relatable protagonist.
"In a world where action movies are dominated by pg-13 giant robots, superheroes, mutants, aliens and whatnot, I really appreciate films like Taken."
I see your point. And it is not just that. Some movies such as this new Terminator (which I have no intention to see it despite Arnie's presence) are being made to be more profitable at the expense of R rating.
IMO, Man on Fire is slightly better than Taken, it also has revenge seeking theme. Just if filmmakers could do without that annoying flashy-style with words popping up on the screen, -
milstar — 10 years ago(July 18, 2015 02:17 AM)
I dunno, man. I'm just sayin there are lousier and similar movies than Taken, but to have almost 8 rating is rather odd to me. I mean, for an action movie, it really has to be something special and if I dare to say - unforgettable. For example, if you watched The Boondock Saints which also holds 7.9 is even more bizarre for me, for me that's VERY overrated. Arnie's Commando has 6.7 (I think) and what the hell? Arnie is Arnie, it's OK. T2 probably has the highest rating - 8.5, and for a good reason. Die Hard - 8.3 and I love that movie too.
When I mentioned action flicks from 80s, I just wanted to say, no matter how crazy it may sound - I am completely enthralled by them. I love the style, music score and they usually don't demand relatable protagonist as now.
"In a world where action movies are dominated by pg-13 giant robots, superheroes, mutants, aliens and whatnot, I really appreciate films like Taken."
I see your point. And it is not just that. Some movies such as this new Terminator (which I have no intention to see it despite Arnie's presence) are being made to be more profitable at the expense of R rating.
IMO, Man on Fire is slightly better than Taken, it also has revenge seeking theme. Just if filmmakers could do without that annoying flashy-style with words popping up on the screen. -
domester82 — 10 years ago(April 05, 2015 11:40 PM)
I watched it for the first time just now. And thought it was really good.
I don't rate films against those from other genres. It's unfair to pit Taken against, say, Citizen Kane.
But for it's genre, for the kind of film it is , Taken is a very good action film with strong characters. I gave it 9 out of 10 -
lycosa — 10 years ago(April 05, 2015 11:40 PM)
I absolutely loved this movie Gets very emotional and Liam Neeson in this is a GOOD!!!!!! TRUE MAN! A REAL MAN! Who loves his family and daughter, his child with true love and is willing to do EPIC Stuff for her safety and well being, so she can live and they can have fun together!
Just so simple. nothing else needed. like someone said, the movie gets you highly emotional. It's true that some of this stuff is totally possible, it's not common, but still. Like tourist and in-general people crimes, russian, polish, albanian, scum. No I am not saying this as racism, but in these movies clearly it's always a typical country or so, where the kidnappers/bad people are from.
This movie in MY HONEST, HUMBLE, 100 PERCENT (%) TruthFul Opinion DESERVES A RATING OF;
7.4/10 (on the imdb scale, considering classics and brilliant movies are 7.6+) -
DracTarashV — 10 years ago(April 17, 2015 03:14 PM)
While I personally wouldn't give it more than a 7.5, I think it is by far one of the most thrilling action movies of the decade. Is it a silly movie devoid of originality? Sure, but it doesn't try to be anything other than an entertaining action picture. Plus, Liam Neeson gave us a very memorable action hero in this.
Hey there, Johnny Boy, I hope you fry! -
Stenian — 10 years ago(November 13, 2015 05:26 AM)
No idea how it's that high. It's got to the most overrated film on IMDb that isn't in the top 250. Maybe a 6.9 would've been worthy, even though that rating is still too generous.
Liam Neeson is an amazing actor, but his character was so unlikable. They made him about to be a cold blooded murderer killing people without mercy and then having the audacity to shoot an innocent housewife (okay, he did say she's okay, but come on). Another thing that bothered me is that he was rarely injured or in danger - even superheros got beaten and hurt. But no, not this guy. Who is 100% human. Seriously, how am I suppose to enjoy a movie where the main character is f-cking invincible? Please
I personally give this film a 4/10. If you want Liam Neeson in action, try Unknown, which is a far superior thriller film. At least in that film, Liam Neeson wasn't invincible and the threat he faced took a toll on him. Heck, that film should've been a 7.9. Unlike Taken, it wasn't just a mindless action film. It had psychological themes and good mystery. But oh well -
CrenshawPete — 10 years ago(February 14, 2016 05:24 PM)
Question: This movie seems to get a high rating, so I'm considering picking up a copy. However, the plot sounds cliched and an awful lot like 24, which I seem to be in the minority on because I didn't like the series. It wasn't slow, but it was kind of cheesy and unbelievable. I do, however, like the Bourne Trilogy and movies like Ronin. Unbelievable too? Perhaps, but they were a higher quality production. So, is Taken more like 24 or Jason Bourne or neither?
-
suadabeslagic1976 — 9 years ago(August 31, 2016 04:00 PM)
I have to agree. The movie is ridiculously overrated. It has all the worst aspects of American 80s action movies without any of their charms like insanely over-the-top action and violence or cheesiness. It's also far too clich, silly and unrealistic to be a gritty 70s-style thriller.
Even the action I thought was rather pedestrian. Even the 'extended, harder cut' as it's called is almost totally bloodless with hardly any memorable action scenes. How many scenes do people actually remember other than the "particular set of skills" monologue?
It may have resonated with people due to the fear of their own children being kidnapped. Also Liam Neeson is in it.
