Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Pedophile subplot

Pedophile subplot

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
31 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #17

    jwelker — 9 years ago(January 24, 2017 02:32 PM)

    Yeah, I was perhaps oversimplifying the issue here. I agree with about everything you said.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #18

      Goodbye_from_Fox_In_A_Box — 9 years ago(January 29, 2017 02:19 PM)

      There are different levels of interest in children.
      Hebephilia is the strong and persistent adult sexual interest in pubescent (early adolescent) individuals, typically ages 1114 (see the Tanner stage). It differs from
      ephebophilia, which is the strong and persistent sexual interest to those in later adolescence, approximately 1519 years old,
      and from pedophilia,[2] which is the primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.
      If he had an attraction to his daughter/the missing girl/Michelle, it would most likely fall into what I bolded. Paedos are for prepubescent children.
      I don't want the world. I just want your half.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #19

        Intothenightalone — 9 years ago(February 05, 2017 07:20 PM)

        That's a clinical term, not the colloquial use.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #20

          civspan — 9 years ago(December 25, 2016 03:26 PM)

          Must be nice to be able to make up your own definitions. I guess I'm the president of the united states then.
          I feel like some people should read a god damned book before they open their metaphorical mouths.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #21

            Smokey_T — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 11:59 AM)

            Yeah, this guy sounds like he should be in the Taliban.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #22

              gabypanama — 9 years ago(December 22, 2016 11:31 AM)

              To me it seemed as he saw every woman as "little girls / daughters" that needed to be saved, not on a sexual-attraction way.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #23

                SarahJConnor — 9 years ago(November 12, 2016 11:56 AM)

                Pretty in Pink was great!
                imo

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #24

                  brjess38 — 9 years ago(December 16, 2016 07:02 PM)

                  Maybe he just liked the movie, so what? I know Alot of men who watch that and other 80's movies.. He wasn't creepy or a pedophile.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #25

                    thunderztorm — 9 years ago(December 17, 2016 12:13 PM)

                    Actually there are quite a few signs that he's out there on that spectrum. Keeps referring to her as "princess" or "girl", rather than woman, for example.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #26

                      gabypanama — 9 years ago(December 22, 2016 11:33 AM)

                      He never molested or attacked her sexually in any way; that specific scene, as well as calling the other victim "his daughter" that his mental problem was "adopting" by force women and convincing himself that where "daughters/girls" that needed help.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #27

                        thunderztorm — 9 years ago(January 22, 2017 01:53 PM)

                        Well, to me that's just another way of molesting people..

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #28

                          gabypanama — 9 years ago(January 22, 2017 03:07 PM)

                          Yes, but I meant not sexually.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #29

                            Smokey_T — 9 years ago(January 24, 2017 02:36 PM)

                            Potentially not sexually.
                            It's possible he just wanted to be alpha, and dad possible.
                            It's also possible that he abused his daughter, was discovered by mum and they fled, that he abused the other girl, and disposed of her body, and would have forced himself upon this girl too, once he gave up on the nice dad facade.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #30

                              Luke_was_a_terrorist — 9 years ago(December 28, 2016 09:38 AM)

                              What pedophile subplot?. he didn't wanna bang Michelle, he just wanted to keep her as his daughter.
                              I think you're the opposite of paranoid, I think you walk around with the delusion people like you.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #31

                                Sequentialist — 9 years ago(February 05, 2017 12:40 PM)

                                What pedophile?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0

                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Groups