Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Why did JJ allow "COVERFIELD" in TITLE as it had NADA to do w/original ?

Why did JJ allow "COVERFIELD" in TITLE as it had NADA to do w/original ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
50 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #40

    MarwoodWalks — 9 years ago(July 25, 2016 03:52 PM)

    It becoming painfully obvious you don't understand what a fallacy is. It isn't wrong to point out that the 2 films are made as films with links when answering a question about one film having 'nada' to do with the other. Its cute that you have a word you (just you) think is clever, but not so good that you don't understand what it means.
    as that is the claim being challenged: By watching the two films, an observer would not logically conclude that they are related.
    um no, you can't just make stuff up. The question is
    'Why did JJ allow "COVERFIELD" in TITLE as it had NADA to do w/origin'
    . The fact that viral marketing and online teaser stuff clearly links the films is very valid in answering the actual question asked. You cant change the question just because you have lost the argument moron.
    I just battered you again, showing clear links between the films, your reply has nothing to refute them.
    "dont you hear that horrible screaming all around you? That screaming men call silence."

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #41

      mugojoe — 9 years ago(July 25, 2016 04:00 PM)

      Ok, I see the problem. I'm going to try to use fewer syllables now.
      The two
      films
      have nothing to do with each other.
      This is true until you bring in
      material that isn't in the films.
      At that point, it's not about the
      films
      , is it?
      Do you understand those words, slappy?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #42

        MarwoodWalks — 9 years ago(July 26, 2016 01:52 AM)

        Not sure I can dumb this down any further for you
        I gave you some stuff IN THE FILM that links them, you have not done a thing to dispute any of my points yet.
        This is true until you bring in material that isn't in the films.
        Oh so now you concede they
        are
        linkedcould have just done that from the start and saved yourself the embarrassment of how you have looked on this threadyou haven't come across well
        "dont you hear that horrible screaming all around you? That screaming men call silence."

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #43

          mugojoe — 9 years ago(July 26, 2016 04:29 AM)

          You provided two tenuous connections:

          1. Things fall from the sky in both alien invasion films.
          2. There's a blink-it-and-miss cameo of the company that is mentioned in both films.
            These elements are distinct in your mind?
            I mean, it totally makes sense if they are given your disdain for critical thought.
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #44

            MarwoodWalks — 9 years ago(July 26, 2016 07:05 AM)

            Oh so you now concede I HAVE provided links from within the films. Take this with your concession that outside info about the films clearly links them, and you have 2 films that are linked.
            Well it took a while, but you finally stayed down and admitted defeat, shame you couldn't do it graciously, but I guess what matters is that you finally see sense.
            "dont you hear that horrible screaming all around you? That screaming men call silence."

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #45

              mugojoe — 9 years ago(July 26, 2016 07:29 AM)

              Yes, I concede that while your effort was dismal and ultimately impotent, the task was technically completed.
              You may have your gold star, sweetpea.
              Now run along.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #46

                MarwoodWalks — 9 years ago(July 26, 2016 07:59 AM)

                A question was asked, and I 'technically completed' the task of answering it correctly.
                What should I do beyond that? What expectations do you have for answers on an internet forum above answering questions correctly?
                You may have your gold star, sweetpea.
                You don't hand out the gold stars numbnuts, and I already got one for my first response on this thread, which was correct. All you have achieved through your posts is make everyone who read your words dislike you. Kudos.
                "dont you hear that horrible screaming all around you? That screaming men call silence."

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #47

                  jaquesburton — 9 years ago(July 26, 2016 06:31 AM)

                  It is very clear there is no point arguing this. Not because the OP is right, but because he cannot concede that anything that didn't originate from his own smug little consciousness has any validity. Being so in love with your self-perceived cleverness and ignoring any reasoning that doesn't conform to your own view doesn't mean you have superior logic, it just makes you look an ass with his fingers in his ears going, "nah, nah, nah. I can't hear you!"
                  That IS a tasty burger!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #48

                    MarwoodWalks — 9 years ago(July 26, 2016 07:09 AM)

                    Yes, I agree, arguing with Mugo is pointless, he is a special kind of stupid. Any other civil discussion I can just agree to disagree, but he decided to be nasty about itso I will continue to peck at his tiny mind.
                    "dont you hear that horrible screaming all around you? That screaming men call silence."

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #49

                      mugojoe — 9 years ago(July 26, 2016 07:34 AM)

                      This is the worst mugojoe fan club meeting ever.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #50

                        mugojoe — 9 years ago(July 26, 2016 07:33 AM)

                        Come on bro. Make an independent thought and defend it. Your nose won't be happy for long in that other guy's sugar barrel.
                        Claim: The two films have no tangible connection that a casual observer would make had their titles been obfuscated.
                        Your challenge to the claim: __________________
                        Go!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups