Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Why the ending was disappointing

Why the ending was disappointing

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
50 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    gregpage — 13 years ago(October 22, 2012 03:24 AM)

    I loved this movie up until the end. Nick Rice, the person responsible for everything that happens in the movie after the Shelton's family is murdered, escapes with himself and his family intact. Everyone around Rice dies a horrible death but not so much as a hair out of place for Rice's wife and kid. For this movie to have an effective ending, they needed to die and certainly Rice had to die. I'm not sure if Foxx has something in his contract that says he needs a happy ending for himself or not, but the ending was a dud.
    The ending knocked this film down to a 6/10, where it should have been at least a 8.5/10.
    How Rice got the bomb back to the jail before Shelton got back is something of a time-warp mistery to me.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      thornsthorns — 13 years ago(October 31, 2012 02:25 PM)

      totally agree.
      disgusting ending to a film that was shaping up to be a classic.
      If the corrupt bureaucrats had been destroyed or been forced to change their ways, that would have been a great ending.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        tails292003 — 11 years ago(May 11, 2014 08:30 PM)

        i totally loved the movie,i hated the arrogant lawyer.the movie should have ended by this prick lawyer experience the same thing with his daughter.and then killed in a long painful way.that would have been the only ending i would have liked.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          Arisuta — 11 years ago(October 05, 2014 01:03 AM)

          Totally agree. For a master of the Art of War like Gerard Butler's character to leave anything to chance without contingencies in place smacks of hubris that he seemed not to have. His building would have been well disguised for what it was and there would have been some sort of device to let him know if it had been entered. A simple burglar alarm would have sufficed for goodness sake.
          "Which it will be ready when it's READY!" Preserved Killick, Master and Commander.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            IMDb User

            This message has been deleted.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              JurijFedorov — 13 years ago(January 05, 2013 12:41 PM)

              But Shelton did achieve his goal. Rice told him in the end that he does not negotiate with murderers anymore. Shelton did place him in a higher position. So he has a man thinking like him having control over the legal system in the city - plan complete. And Rice did become a better human being, and he even appreciated his family more when it was all over. Remember, it was never Sheltons plan to kill Rice - he just wanted to teach him a lesson.
              Even the mayor said that they had to do what needed to be done - no matter the small and counterintuitive rules. Exactly the opposite of what the judge and Rice said in the beginning of the movie at the murder-trial. And the mayor and Rice didn't care about their positions anymore they just wanted to do the right thing and fight the crime, that's why Rice was promoted instead of being fired and that's why he killed Shelton.
              GREAT MOVIE, I think 8,5 is well deserved. (please adjust your rating) 🙂

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                JeffAtlanta2004 — 13 years ago(February 02, 2013 01:55 PM)

                100% agree. Reminds me of Fracture. The last 10 minutes of both films negated and undermined what were otherwise great films.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  statman122 — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 09:35 PM)

                  100% agree. Reminds me of Fracture. The last 10 minutes of both films negated and undermined what were otherwise great films.
                  Exactly!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    ChefC — 12 years ago(June 10, 2013 02:49 AM)

                    I agree Rice shouldn't have escaped unharmed.
                    Although I think they attempted to explain how he got back faster by implying Shelton had spent some time waiting out traffic/random searches inside a car park.
                    He encounters a road block and enters a car park to avoid it. Then you see him exiting the car park and there is no longer traffic.

                    Gone too soon:
                    Firefly|New Amsterdam|Journeyman|Life|terriers|SGU|Prime Suspect

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      KrissAnd159 — 11 years ago(November 20, 2014 03:10 AM)

                      Absolutely agreed to what you said there.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #19

                        Thunder — 1 year ago(February 21, 2025 06:48 PM)

                        I agree about his family but think he cared more about Sarah than he did his family. So it tortured him when Sarah died. He was a lousy husband and father.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #20

                          casinada27 — 12 years ago(July 30, 2013 11:08 PM)

                          And that's exactly why it seems so dissapointing! J.F.'s character never seemed to assume resposibility, never acknowledged that the system was wrong or broken, never learned the lesson Clyde was trying to teach. Wich kinda sucks.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #21

                            iroquoisjoe — 12 years ago(July 31, 2013 04:01 AM)

                            J.F.'s character never seemed to assume resposibility, never acknowledged that the system was wrong or broken, never learned
                            you clearly didn't watch the movie carefully. I mean he only said it out loud while looking at the old crime scene photos.
                            Jamie Foxx's character even gave Clyde the chance to do the right thingto stop killing innocent people. Murdering innocent people is much worse.
                            On November 6, 2012God blessed America

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #22

                              tails292003 — 11 years ago(May 11, 2014 08:36 PM)

                              it was you that did not watch the movie,jamie foxx's character went and made a deal with the killer of this guys family,then he acting all arogant.i would have kill his family and then himm,slowly.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #23

                                kjhuang17 — 11 years ago(May 07, 2014 12:47 AM)

                                He was killing people with impunity even after being locked away showing that the justice system was weak.
                                I don't think it was the justice system that was weak; I think it was the security of the prison cell he was in.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #24

                                  mauness — 13 years ago(June 21, 2012 01:18 AM)

                                  It was the part when the girl that works under Jamie Foxx said, "I love what I do, but I want to make sure that I gave up those things [in life] for more than just a high conviction rate." And Jamie Foxx's character says nothing. That kind of says it all. I always feel that people can always justify crappy behaviour.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    fgadmin
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #25

                                    iroquoisjoe — 13 years ago(June 22, 2012 02:02 AM)

                                    It's just words in a movie, dude!
                                    The words of a writer, not a real world person. Sarah is a character in a film. Don't let it get you down, man!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      fgadmin
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #26

                                      mauness — 13 years ago(June 22, 2012 02:14 AM)

                                      hahaha - Thanks guys. I just love film so much, I analyse too much. lol! Have a great weekend!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • F Offline
                                        F Offline
                                        fgadmin
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #27

                                        iroquoisjoe — 13 years ago(June 22, 2012 06:35 AM)

                                        Hey!
                                        You are welcome! Enjoy the film for what it is (and enjoy all films for what they are) and have a yourself a great weekend!!!
                                        Take care!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          fgadmin
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #28

                                          eenden-39-416927 — 13 years ago(November 17, 2012 06:56 PM)

                                          Although I tend to agree with you, Iroguoisjoe, I also feel there's nothing wrong for an idea (even if it is from a movie) to be food for thought.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups