they're telling us how to be fashionable????
-
kay_cee_d — 15 years ago(October 02, 2010 01:33 PM)
She was in a car accident
Check out my Blog:
http://heckyeahheckno.wordpress.com/
Twitter:
HeckYeahHeckNo -
Dragon000 — 15 years ago(October 03, 2010 08:55 PM)
I agree that the haircut is terrible, what is she trying to do, look like little boy blue?
Also her nose-job is reminiscent of Michael Jackson
Grace is about as glamorous as a typical "trailer park child pageant mom" type. -
star168 — 15 years ago(October 06, 2010 11:44 PM)
Just because she was once a model and was in a car accident is no excuse to let herself go, which is what I feel she did. No car accident affects your hair! Get a decent, flattering haircut. It would do so much for her.
-
maturity — 10 years ago(November 06, 2015 10:55 AM)
Maybe she feels like crap about working with Wintour and pushing a lot of overpriced crappy clothes, jewelry, hair care products and makeup. Maybe her messy hair and clothes express rebellion or at least discontent.
-
kaskait — 14 years ago(May 05, 2011 08:24 PM)
The point wasn't about Grace and Anna looking beautiful. It was about their sense of beauty. Both have been in the business long enough, and they are old enough to do away with looking like hip young things.
Grace Coddington's work always, ALWAYS looks gorgeous. I pick up the magazine every once in awhile and I can always pick out Coddington's editorials because they are that good. So it really doesn't matter if she shows up to work in a bathrobe as long as what pictorials she edits/directs look gorgeous.
It is the same with Wintour. She has a good sense of the fashion long view and a great eye to pick out photos/fashion that will look good for the whole magazine not just one editorial.
Lets face it, because they are women in high powered jobs they are expected to look forever young. Men in the same position would never get the same flack for their fashion taste. -
geesuz — 12 years ago(June 01, 2013 07:49 PM)
Thank you. It was sounding like highschool mean girls on this thread.
There is a difference between having style and being pretty. Both women know who they are and what they wish to appear as. At their ages they can do as they please without answering to the pretty police. Diana Vreeland wasn't typically pretty either.
These women are where they are due to work and talent. Vogue is Vogue, its aspirational, not a catalog.
I came away from the film admiring both women, though for different reasons. Both are legends. No one else can do what they do, as well. Women oddly get slammed for looks or attitude whereas men don't, and most often by other women.
That's a word that hates women. Tim: What? "Twat"? Daisy: No, "jumpsuit." -
maturity — 10 years ago(November 06, 2015 11:03 AM)
Vogue and other fashion magazines are a catalog. All they exist for is to sell products. They are 90% ads. As for Wintour and Coddington's editorial taste, it's not as good as the editors of Vogue Paris, Italia or British.
Men aren't allowed or encouraged to wear the variety of clothing styles and colors that women are. A male executive would be wearing a simple Brooks Brothers or Armani or Cerutti suit, with dark colors most likely. And they would have a simple timeless haircut not a trendy fad haircut. Jackie Kennedy, Grace Kelley and Aidrey Hepburn had timeless style. Michelle Obama. Don't try to make this about femninism or patriarchy. A man would be ridiculed if he wore lots of clothing styles of colors. At most a guy can wear a pink dress shirt or golf shirt and not be called or assumed to be gay.