Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Pennywise, the clown, comes back to life every 27 years and 27 years after the original IT returns but as a big-screen f

Pennywise, the clown, comes back to life every 27 years and 27 years after the original IT returns but as a big-screen f

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
7 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — It


    berryman81 — 5 years ago(January 10, 2021 06:30 PM)

    Pennywise, the clown, comes back to life every 27 years and 27 years after the original IT returns but as a big-screen film. It was highly praised. But coz I don't believe in a perfect movie here are 10 things wrong with IT

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      AnthonyRocks — 5 years ago(January 11, 2021 03:20 PM)

      I actually liked both "
      IT: CHAPTER ONE
      " and "
      IT: CHAPTER TWO
      ".

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        berryman81 — 5 years ago(January 13, 2021 05:48 PM)

        So did i, But that dosnt mean that there is nothing wrong with it

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          jbaker1-2 — 3 years ago(December 12, 2022 04:20 AM)

          The biggest thing wrong is that it wasn't directed by Frank Darabont, the only director (if you don't count Rob Reiner's one-off) who does King justice.
          As a fan of the novel (I consider it King's masterpiece), I felt Muschietti's adaptation is/was a near total failure.
          There are 8.2 billion people in the world. 8.19 billion of them have never heard of and don't give a fuck about Charlie Kirk. Get over it.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            exithereplease — 3 months ago(December 06, 2025 09:26 PM)

            Same thing with Part II of the TV MOVIE.
            Nobody gives a **** about adults chasing a clown.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              exithereplease — 3 months ago(December 06, 2025 09:27 PM)

              It kills the nostalgia and grows silliness.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                exithereplease — 3 months ago(December 06, 2025 09:29 PM)

                Oops…I thought we were talking about the sequel.
                Can't find it on FILMBOARDS.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0

                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Groups