Sequel or Prequel?
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Red Dead Redemption
ginnyjinxedandhanshotritafirst — 13 years ago(December 12, 2012 05:30 PM)
Which would you prefer?
I don't think they can do another game without John. So maybe telling the story of him and his gang would make for a better game. -
briangcb — 13 years ago(December 12, 2012 06:29 PM)
That would be fun, but for me personally, I think the game being set in 1911, you can't really have a sequel because RDR basically was at the end of the old West. So a prequel would realistically be the only option (unless it was set the same year)
so I'd like to see a spiritual sequel or perhaps a game that takes place around 1876 and maybe have some cameos by younger versions of the characters
A young John Marston, Landon Ricketts, etc. but I think it'd be better to play as someone else. Maybe someone else in John's gang, so John will be in the whole game but it won't be restricted to his storyline.
Daggett: I've paid you a small fortune!
Bane: And this gives you power over me?