list=WL
-
Rocketman — 2 years ago(August 17, 2023 04:24 AM)
You're pretty sure 77 million would show up. Let's half that number… and then… half that number… and then… idk… half that number. What number are we left with? 9.625 million.
Oof… stills seems too high. Let's half that number two more times and then half whatever number we get from that aaaannnnndddd… 1.2 million. STILL SEEMS TOO HIGH!
Let's take 1.2 million and take a third away from it… 800,000.
Checks math
Checks math again
Slaps computer against a wall
Still shows up as 800,000. Great. There's your army. At least an estimation. We could add the number of current servicemen and women that'd be likely to join if it'd make you feel better (probably 500,000 or so) so that brings the number to… 1.3 million. Great. They'd still get ****ing owned.
You seriously have no clue what the average person is like, dude. People are ****ing lazy. Most gun owners aren't as militant/insane about their right to gun ownership as you.
your summerization proves that you read it after all
Nice self-pwn there, broski. I guess it is true… you are a human toilet.
Throughout Heaven and Earth, I alone am the honored one. -
Soul_Venom — 2 years ago(August 17, 2023 01:22 PM)
Your estimate is low. But sure, let's go with your number. The entire American military offensive was ground to a halt by 100,000 insurgent camel jockeys who barely had a pot to piss in. Now multiply that number by 130x. That means the insurgency here would be at least 130x worse.
But wait, theres more!
Seem these insurgents wouldnt be camel jockeys. They would be Americans.
Many would have access to more tools money and chemicals than an entire Iraqi village. Critical infrastructure would be knocked out rapidly. Pretty soon, food fuel and munitions resupply would slow to a trickle. The military is easy to identify but the insurgents are everyday folk. The military would have the devils own time trying to ferret out every small group and individual. IEDs would hit every convoy. It would be the biggest game of whack-a-mole in history. And need I repeat that we have better personal arms and way more ammo?
Your reading comprehension is still below potato.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
Soul_Venom — 2 years ago(August 18, 2023 03:42 AM)
https://www.quora.com/Can-any-well-regulated-militia-with-guns-actually-defeat-the-technological-might-of-the-US-Military-were-it-to-somehow-be-controlled-by-a-tyrant
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
Soul_Venom — 2 years ago(August 18, 2023 02:08 PM)
/. said...
LOL he's hiding from his boyfriend
I wonder if you understand just how impressive you are /.
It is supposed to be impossible to have a negative IQ, one totaling LESS than zero. Yet here you are, killing it.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
/. — 2 years ago(August 18, 2023 02:30 PM)
Soul_Venom said...
I wonder if you understand just how impressive you are /.
It is supposed to be impossible to have a negative IQ, one totaling LESS than zero. Yet here you are, killing it.
My password is password -
/. — 2 years ago(August 17, 2023 02:38 AM)
You argue that members of the military would all side with gun owners and that's also ****in wrong. Some of them would, yes, but many wouldn't.
https;//www,thesoldiersproject,org/percentage-of-the-us-military-is-conservative/
Based on personal experience I know that most would.
siding with gun owners ≠ conservative
Also, the vast majority of career military: God, Country, Corps
…but you already knew that.
My password is password -
Soul_Venom — 2 years ago(August 17, 2023 03:00 AM)
Most of the military is not career. But ALL of them are sworn to uphold the Constitution. The 1st & 2nd Amendments are sacrosect among them. Most of them couldn't tell you what the 8th or the 15th were but damn near all of them KNOW the first two.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins!
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 
️