Don't you mean the voter fraud speculations? No real evidence?
-
Cerridwen — 5 years ago(November 30, 2020 04:14 PM)
We've known that keeping people away from each other works since the 1918 influenza pandemic.
In regards to said influenza pandemic:
But eventually, the most drastic and sweeping measures paid off. After implementing a multitude of strict closures and controls on public gatherings, St. Louis, San Francisco, Milwaukee, and Kansas City responded fastest and most effectively: Interventions there were credited with cutting transmission rates by 30 to 50 percent. New York City, which reacted earliest to the crisis with mandatory quarantines and staggered business hours, experienced the lowest death rate on the Eastern seaboard.
In 2007, a study in the Journal of the American Medial Association analyzed health data from the U.S. census that experienced the 1918 pandemic, and charted the death rates of 43 U.S. cities. That same year, two studies published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences sought to understand how responses influenced the disease’s spread in different cities. By comparing fatality rates, timing, and public health interventions, they found death rates were around 50 percent lower in cities that implemented preventative measures early on, versus those that did so late or not at all. The most effective efforts had simultaneously closed schools, churches, and theaters, and banned public gatherings. This would allow time for vaccine development (though a flu vaccine was not used until the 1940s) and lessened the strain on health care systems.
The studies reached another important conclusion: That relaxing intervention measures too early could cause an otherwise stabilized city to relapse. St. Louis, for example, was so emboldened by its low death rate that the city lifted restrictions on public gatherings less than two months after the outbreak began. A rash of new cases soon followed. Of the cities that kept interventions in place, none experienced a second wave of high death rates.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/2020/03/how-cities-flattened-curve-1918-spanish-flu-pandemic-coronavirus/
Hark! Harold the angel sings. -
Ur not thinking clearly — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 04:23 AM)
Yermom doesn't read studies and such. He wishes to preserve the vital purity of his mind untarnished.
You are indicting your own technique for maintaining your stance on election fraud while being unwilling to examine evidence that threatens the legitimacy of said stance.
I believe we are witnessing the ultimate humiliation; self humiliation.
Enjoy. -
dbentley666 — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 04:25 AM)
What about evidence for the efficacy of chloroquine for COVID? Since you get all your information from Donald, surely you'd like to defend that? And what about Obama being a Muslim? Surely you have some sworn affidavits (affadavits?) testifying to that? Elvis being alive?
-
-
Ur not thinking clearly — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 04:43 AM)
You have continually and aptly demonstrated that you are deathly afraid that 10 minutes of sworn testimony with be earth-shaking to your position and self-esteem.
I cherish watching you nourish that fear. -
dbentley666 — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 04:46 AM)
Yes, I am quaking in my (leather, lace-up) boots. Somehow insane videos that offer to prove the ridiculous do that to me. I still haven't watched those famous videos purporting to show, in lurid detail, King Kong having sex with a pale virgin from Montmartre or that other one that is supposed to show us the abominable snowman eating spaghetti with a wooden spoon! Silly me!
-
Ur not thinking clearly — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 04:52 AM)
The 10 minutes you are so fearful of is nowhere near insane, but you can't risk discovering there are legitimate, learned witnesses who saw strong arm tactics and all manner of illegal voting irregularities.
I humbly accept your nervous admission of intellectual dishonesty and utter defeat in all your feeble attempts to justify you positions.
Weak positions that cannot be supported according to you. Because you never tried. -
dbentley666 — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 04:55 AM)
I suspect your video is like one of those that feature in horror movies. Anyone watching it to the end will become a Republican (horror of horrors) and find thick brown hairdye running down the sides of their faces!
-
dbentley666 — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 05:05 AM)
Ur not thinking clearly said...
You have a short memory. Look 3 posts up to the one that begins "The 10 minutes you are so fearful of…"
You should write out a sworn affidavit. Also, please mention your accredited university, Trump U. -
Ur not thinking clearly — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 05:07 AM)
dbentley666 said...
You should write out a sworn affidavit. Also, please mention your accredited university, Trump U.
You should be embarrassed for yourself. But apparently you're a typical shameless liberal commie. You'll never get your Marxist utopia on this soil. -
dbentley666 — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 05:09 AM)
Ur not thinking clearly said...
You should be embarrassed for yourself. But apparently you're a typical shameless liberal commie. You'll never get your Marxist utopia on this soil.
What's a liberal commie? At the accredited university where I teach, it is assumed that liberalism and communism are distinct, and even opposed, political systems. I suppose you went to an institution where there was Trumpism, and then all the other systems that Fox News distrusted? -
Ur not thinking clearly — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 05:13 AM)
dbentley666 said...
What's a liberal commie? At the accredited university where I teach, it is assumed that liberalism and communism are distinct, and even opposed, political systems. I suppose you went to an institution where there was Trumpism, and then all the other systems that Fox News distrusted?
More intellectually dishonest blather. I don't know how you keep showing such idiocy while claiming to be an academic. I'm sure your colleagues would be terribly sad for you if they were here. If you even have colleagues. -
dbentley666 — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 05:17 AM)
Ur not thinking clearly said...
More intellectually dishonest blather. I don't know how you keep showing such idiocy while claiming to be an academic. I'm sure your colleagues would be terribly sad for you if they were here. If you even have colleagues.
So you don't distinguish between political positions? You're a red-blooded American male, by goddam, and you won't have any damn pinkos spoiling the American way with their talk of abolishing private property!