4 poor, technologically challenged Somalians were able to board a ship this big?
-
cribera-1 — 11 years ago(May 04, 2014 10:16 PM)
I mean, they were US soldiers aboard, or did I understand wrong such part?
If the cargo+ship is worth millions of U$, how come INSURANCE COMPANIES won't demand such BASIC security (2 to 4 well armed men, even with at least a missile launcher, apart from machine guns, mercenaries on the payroll of the ship's company or the insurance company), to be able to have the ship insured? -
Wiccaman — 11 years ago(May 05, 2014 11:53 AM)
Until relatively recently insurance companies were quire reluctant to encourage armed guards. They believed that the consequences of a firefight would be more costly than the cost of a boarding (this was in the days that pirates just tended to nick money and easily transportable valuables than the ship itself).
Now though they do offer a bit of a discount on the premium if there is
trained
security on board. It's normally around 25% for non armed guards and 50% for armed guards.
This is just for bulk cargo carriers carrying inert goods though. They still don't like armed guards on petroleum and chemical carriers because of the fire/explosion risk. -
r_freeman — 11 years ago(April 20, 2014 04:46 AM)
I found it frustrating watching the crew do nothing until it was too late and they were aboard. The film bored me throughout, and I can't understand why it's rated so highly.
- Opinions are like a$$holes, everyone has them, and they normally stink.
-
Galactus03 — 11 years ago(May 03, 2014 07:49 PM)
with everything you said.plus the movie just plain stunk.based on true events or not it really wasnt that dramatic of a story for the big screen. TV film perhaps but not a major motion picture. Also did you notice how much more exciting the poster for the film made the boarding of the ship look. Lol
-
estocade — 11 years ago(June 07, 2014 02:25 PM)
I don't care how feeble is the person, if he's pointing ak47 at me, and there were several of them.
However, it was stupid, how vulnerable they were against the pirates. At least they could've had a panic room.
But like Hanks said in the beginning they (bosses) want everything done cheap.
On the other hand that rescue mission was pretty costly I bet.
It comes down to who pays in the end.
The money, it's all about the money.
Pathetic businessmen on both sides. -
nextstopvegas — 11 years ago(July 25, 2014 02:48 PM)
OP is correct. It is ridiculous.
And in response to the lame 'it actually happened so there' - just because it happened doesn't mean it still isn't totally ridiculous.
Plenty of things happen in real life that make us all say WTF. The reason security is beefed up on these vessels now is precisely because this incident was so stupid. -
mematron — 11 years ago(September 15, 2014 12:56 AM)
Yeah, it's just as absurd as some guys hiJacking a plane with just mace and knives and using it as a missile to take down a high-rise building.
You are going to see, hear and experience many things that seem impossible and improbable before you turn to dust.
Hell, I was 8 years old, living in San Diego, California when I saw a falling out of the sky. At the time it was the deadliest plane crash in aviation history.
I've seen and experienced many more things that seen unreal. This planet is cool but it's also messed up.
My YouTube Show: https://www.youtube.com/user/demodular -
MyDarkStar — 11 years ago(October 27, 2014 06:28 AM)
I totally agree with the OP. I can't believe that this happened. You set off on a ship with millions of dollars of cargo & $30k in cash in waters that are KNOWINGLY DANGEROUS without a gun ?!?! That's just plain stupid. There's no other way to put it.
I never would have taken off on that ship without a handgun at the very very least. More than likely I would have had a rifle with a huge scope on it which I could have used to pick off the pirates on their little dinky boat one by one. -
davcalla777 — 11 years ago(March 18, 2015 06:25 AM)
U ask me, the second we got back back to the States,I would have hunted Captain Phillips down and killed him, he ignored protocol, he had very very adequate time to activate security protocol, and let them pirates on his ship, he simply was trying to show off, and in the process nearly got himself, his crew, and put the lives of sailors at risk for his modesty and ignoring protocol, yep, I would kill him dead the minute I stepped stateside
-
Monkeydigital — 10 years ago(June 18, 2015 07:16 AM)
My question is, why not just crush that tiny ass wooden boat? The pirates already showed their intentions when they started shooting at the ship. The second they pull up to the ship, turn the wheel hard to port and capsize that wooden wreck. Toss a few life vests, supplies overboard and radio their position and keep trucking. Hopefully for them, a vessel would get there before they became fish food.
-
denham — 10 years ago(September 08, 2015 04:20 AM)
The crew didn't have guns, but there were fire hoses, with power evidently comparable to water cannon, which were used to try to keep the skiffs from getting close enough for boarding. I wonder if one or more of the fire hoses might profitably have been reserved for knocking off any pirate from the top of the boarding ladder. A hose operator could be positioned out of line of fire from the skiff and a hose is, unlike a flare gun, not a one shot weapon?
(If someone were tempted to respond "It didn't happen like that!" this would suggest a limited understanding of the concept of counterfactual hypothesis.)
I beseech ye in the bowels of Christ, think that ye may be mistaken.