In reality!!! If this earth discovered another planet with life and attempted to go, what do you think we would do befor
-
dcdw21 — 15 years ago(January 19, 2011 12:53 PM)
IIRC The Orson Wells War of the World, the aliens weren't that advanced, in turn they were almost at the same level but in a different branch. What I mean is that, yes they had technology we didn't (walking tripods, and heat rays), but at the same time we had technology they didn't (Airplanes and flight in general). The walkers didn't have shields and even one of them was shot down by artillery fire. Technically the aliens trump card was chemical warfare where they used the black smoke which poisoned and killed anyone who breathed it in, which was used to wipe out cities and military fronts.
It's been awhile but I believe that since they didn't have the knowledge of flight, their method of getting to Earth was to load their walkers into giant tubes and shoot them sort of like a giant bullet at Earth from Mars. It was said there was giant green flashes erupting from Mars before the tubes landed which I take for sort of a muzzle flash from whatever launched the tubes. It's been awhile so my recollection of it may not be entirely accurate. -
astream99 — 15 years ago(January 19, 2011 07:03 PM)
I didn't bother to read every post here, but to answer the question in the title of this thread - if the aliens have been able to get HERE, they are obviously more advanced than us regarding technology at least.
Oh, and dcdw21 - you're right about the War Of The Worlds. They were shot here in giant cylinders. -
FCA1975 — 14 years ago(July 27, 2011 01:01 AM)
by PresidentBaltar (Mon Nov 22 2010 20:19:01)
Ignore this User | Report Abuse
"The closest dwarf star galaxy is about 40,000 LIGHT YEARS away."
So what? Proxima Centauri is the closest star at only 4 light years away.
"If an alien race traveled from there at the speed of light, it would take them 40,000 years to arrive at earth."
Or, only 4 years from Proxima Centauri.
"That means they would have achieved light speed, and left their home planet while we were still cavemen trying to figure out how to use fire."
Or, while Bush was president.
"Not only that, but they would have to have the technology required to survive space travel for such a length of time"
4 years?
"Imagine the type of energy required to travel such a vast distance (read: unlimited energy)."
The Voyager 1 spacecraft, launched on Sept. 5, 1977, is 11 billion miles away from the sun, and is using no energy at all, other than inertia ( read: no energy )
"Also, it means that their civilization would have to have been in existence MUCH longer than ours"
Well, at least 4 years longer.
"We as a civilization are not even close to being able to do something like that. Our space shuttles travel approximately 4000 miles per hour."
The Helios missions to the Sun both reached a velocity of 153,800 mph.
"Don't even get me started on if the aliens could travel through space via wormholes or faster than light."
Why not? I want to see some more wrong information from you.
"You see, the movies get it wrong. They create weaknesses in the aliens to create hope for the audience."
Destruction by the fusion reaction of a nuclear warhead is not a "created weakness". It's a fact.
"If aliens were to really arrive here - we'd better pray that they're merciful and don't instantly destroy or enslave us. We would not stand a chance."
Well, not unless we had nuclear warheads.
"We would be like ants trying to fight gods."
Thank god ants don't have nuclear weapons.
The logic contained in the posts of those which you mocked went completely, utterly, and tragically WAY over your head. At first I thought you were trying to be funny and sarcastic. But after reading your other posts, I see that you are just a dumba$$. -
Violet_Loves_Iliona — 15 years ago(January 20, 2011 01:47 AM)
It makes sense that they're so much more technologically advanced than us because they would have to be to be travelling around the universe invading other planets. For all we know, they've been doing this for millennia.
)
..) .*)
(. (. -
sd-106 — 14 years ago(May 07, 2011 03:39 PM)
An interesting alternative take on this is covered in Larry Niven's "Banquo's Ghost" where the aliens are much less advanced than us but happened to stumble upon FTL travel. They turn up shortly after our sub-lightspeed probes reach their planet and are here to watch when the data starts coming in several years later.
-
michaelexarkun — 14 years ago(May 16, 2011 01:02 PM)
Here's a good plot for a movie- an alien ship arrives made out of wood. Inside, the aliens are armed with cross bows and witch doctors.
As has been mentioned by others, in order for a civilization to travel across light-years of space their technologic level would have to be greater than ours.
Also, there is at least a fairly good chance that such a civilization is predatory.(like us) -
thebard2000 — 14 years ago(June 10, 2011 01:53 PM)
hahahaha
Cross brows if their lucky. They come to invade us and we find them huddled up in the corner of their flying wooden box looking scared out of their minds next to a pile of rocks that they brought to throw at us. -
BigBadLarry — 14 years ago(June 16, 2011 12:05 AM)
Hmm, you could perhaps make a distinction between the techonologies they and we use.
With FTL of course they would be more advanced - we don't have it.
But who is saying that their weapon and armor technology is superior?
Maybe their weapons are based on different uses and facts of their world and thus is more effective against their own kind than us?
Or although they are to some extent violent etc. they don't comprehend violence as explicit as we do or don't have the creativity to develop the selfdestructive kind we can (nuclear weapons - destroy your enemy - dance in the Fallout).
You have the possibility that it is not a whole race that invades us but a little fraction - like some settlers thinking that they could just overrun some native americans really quick.
Then there is the chance that we adapt and use their technology to their dismay (throw away the bow - take the rifle).
Who knows - it could be that some of their own race (or another) just supply us with what we need because they want to make a quick buck, I am certain they will get whatever they want - if it is burgers, flowers or virgins, we don't care.
There are enough ways to tell the story different - I am just too sick of the indestructable foe (that at the end sucks out of sheer luck - same in this movie - you would think they would know their technology and just sort out an ORANGE BRAIN).
I catch myself to often telling myself "Yeah forget the story, they will win yadayada, yeah romance, last beep go onwhere is the last stand? Some explosions should come now - ah there they are. Yay. Oh we lost, something really new. Oh and now they start failing in all their omnipotence. Ah. Endcredits. Another SciFi waste." -
kitchenaut-1 — 14 years ago(June 16, 2011 01:58 PM)
Obviously they're more advanced, or they wouldn't be able to cross interstellar space. That ability necessitates command of colossal energies and extremely strong materials, so any nonsense about 'well they might have more advanced spaceflight but that doesn't mean their military is powerful' is wishful thinking that doesn't reflect how engineering and science grow. It suggests that each discipline develops in isolation, although Earth's space and military technologies evolved in parallel, so if you apply that to the level of interstellar travel, then by compariosn our weapons will be quite feeble.
Those people saying that these aliens are too advanced seriously need to read some hard sci-fi, or even moderately intelligent sci-fi shows, such as Babylon 5, where humanity finds just how far down the galactic food chain it is.
Too advanced! LMAO! -
BigBadLarry — 14 years ago(June 18, 2011 04:32 AM)
Oh beep another brainiac who thinks his view is everything.
So of course the aliens have to feel, think and develop like we do.
Ohhh how could I think differentwait there was some wordI think it was "alien"?
Nah that is just my imagination.
They HAVE TO EVOLVE just like us. Gnihihi. Yeah.
Not to forget that the weapon technologies alone in different countries of the world developed totally different (history too!), but what am I saying.
I bow down to your omnipotence.
Babylon 5! LMAO! -
kitchenaut-1 — 14 years ago(January 25, 2012 08:38 AM)
A nice line in strawman and ad hominem fallacies you've drawn there, with a dose of petulant and infantile sarcasm thrown in..
Not to forget that the weapon technologies alone in different countries of the world developed totally different (history too!), but what am I saying.
Until you get to the application of physics in weaponary. They may use a different concept to describe e=mc^2 but mass-energy equivalence still holds for them as much as it does us, or they wouldn't function in this universe. Whether you use bamboo spears of mass-drivers, ballistics are ballistics, energy is energy, and evolution is moot - Physics is more fundamental than biology. The fact they can travel interstellar medium necessitates a far more advanced level of physics. Too bad you can't understand this through your sad attempt to belittle me.
And I think the word you were fumbling for was omniscience, rather than omnipotence.