Well Lana's return was a waste.
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — American Horror Story
blonde800 — 9 years ago(November 17, 2016 02:25 PM)
So after the hype over the last few weeks and the promo making it seem like she was going to be a huge part of the finale it seems like Lana Winters was only bought out of retirement so she could get smacked in the head with a gun.
Ryan Murphy seriously has no clue does he?! I guess we should just be thankful he didn't bring her back just to kill her off. -
blonde800 — 9 years ago(November 17, 2016 02:40 PM)
Did Lana really need to return for those comparisons to be made and what did that actually add to the story or Lee's character other than "Oh hey I guess you two are strong women who survived tough situations!"
You could compare Lee to any strong character from the show.
Ultimately Lana really didn't offer anything of value to the finale or Lee's character other than giving the viewers a chance to go "Ooh look it's Lana!!!" -
Steal-No-Evol — 9 years ago(November 18, 2016 11:23 AM)
I agree with this.
Bringing back Lana served to give Lee some undue credit. The show wasn't about Lee being a good mother or a strong woman, but it ended up being something like that. We didn't spend enough time experiencing things through Lee's perspective, and that's one of the reasons fans are like 'Lee wasn't a hero.' Because she did some horrible stuff. Some good. Some real bad.
With Lana in the Asylum we sympathized with her, then as she got stronger, did questionable or worse things, we were still able to side with her as we saw what she had to endure and go through.
We only hear about that with Lee. But we don't get to see it. Why did we never learn more about Lee's FIRST daughter who disappeared? That was intriguing as hell, and it's mentioned in one episode and dropped. Why? Bad writing and clueless direction.
So anyway Lana shows up to give Lee the rub. It didn't work, obviously. -
gabrielianarman — 9 years ago(November 17, 2016 02:52 PM)
I think they were similar because they killed to survive, in a sense. They are both controversial. But I think it felt forced because it was Lee who insisted they were similar. She wanted to make it seem like her actions were justified.
-
gabrielianarman — 9 years ago(November 17, 2016 03:04 PM)
I see your point. I think that was incorporated into the story, though. In the end, Lee was hunted down and killed herself because she knew that her life would never end peacefully, while Lana admitted she killed those men and is seen as a hero.
-
gabrielianarman — 9 years ago(November 17, 2016 02:44 PM)
No one said she was going to play a huge part in the finale. That's what you thought would happen and obviously you were disappointed. But what was she supposed to do if that were the case? Hunt ghosts with Lee the entire episode?
-
blonde800 — 9 years ago(November 17, 2016 10:49 PM)
Considering she was the only character alongside Lee to be show in the only promo for 6x10 I thought it implied she was going to be a much bigger part of the episode or have her inclusion involve some sort of purpose. As for hunting ghostsdid I say that's what she should'be been doing? I thought she was going to really crack Lee's cold front and despite the majority of the world think Roanoke was a hoax she at the end could'be been swayed by Lee to truly believe.
As for Lee and Lana showing similarities. I think the point of them both killing to survive was supposed to be hammered home with the reference to Lana killing Bloodyface Jr. Both women have controversially killed to survive. -