You don't have a good enough argument to counter the points.
-
SkeksisGirl — 11 years ago(May 11, 2014 08:19 PM)
Actually, the only insane person here is you. You can't comprehend the fact that the kid wasn't being abused AND that the kid can be taught to change his behavior a LOT easier than a cat can because the kid has critical thinking skills that cats do not.
Never have kids, and NEVER have pets.
"Slice, Pull, Staple, its a boy!" - Maul57
I can handle the whatever! -
SapphEyeR — 11 years ago(May 11, 2014 08:31 PM)
And noise doesn't cause PTSD. Noise can be a trigger for PTSD.
I'm quoting Jackson himself here.
And hey, whatever. If YOU can't teach a kid to treat an animal with respect please, don't have kids.
You have nothing else to say so you're going repeat thye don't have kids trope?
"Whatever"? You misstate, maybe even lie about, the facts of the show and then you just say "Whatever?" when I call you out on it? -
SkeksisGirl — 11 years ago(May 12, 2014 01:46 AM)
The reason she's saying don't have kids is because you keep showing your lack of compassion towards animals and knowledge of raising children.
So yes, don't have kids, you show a complete lack of maturity.
"Slice, Pull, Staple, its a boy!" - Maul57
I can handle the whatever! -
SkeksisGirl — 9 years ago(May 15, 2016 05:38 PM)
Wow, you must be REALLY jonesing for a beat verbal beat down that you went looking for a two year dead thread just to attack someone.
My, you are completely pathetic and in need of attention.
Do the world a favor and don't breed. Ever.
"I'm taking Mary home."
"You're what?"
"Mary's taking me home."
"Better." -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 12:17 PM)
Name-calling, no matter how thick the beep that rains down, can't beat down good sense and facts, dumbass. You and your buddies got the beat-down.
Do the world a favor and don't breed. Ever
You keep repeating yourself. That's the mark of a limited intellect. -
SkeksisGirl — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 01:31 PM)
Actually, the one that got beat down was you. Horribly, so horribly that you needed to rez a thread that was dead for two yeas just to get some action.
Keep beating your head against the wall. Maybe some day it'll knock some sense into you.
"I'm taking Mary home."
"You're what?"
"Mary's taking me home."
"Better." -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 04:23 PM)
But you'll never keep the weight off, porky. Because you are weak.
You like dirty fighting? That's what you and your buddies here do. Fat shaming is not much different from telling someone not to breed.
Intelligence? You're not in my league.
How about sticking to the subject? Should a parent let their 5-year-old be subject to attacks from an animal? -
AnnotatedSPN — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 05:17 PM)
Wait
You rezzed a 2 year old thread about a woman who certainly wasn't raising her kids right and was tormenting a poor cat JUST to insult SG and use fatphobic rethoric as if you were a 10 year old bully in elementary school?
Man, that is the most pathetic thing I've seen in my life.
And to stay in subject? Someone who chooses to have children AND take care of an animal should first educate the children so that they do not provoke the animal into attacking them. I have a 5 year old niece, and despite the fact that one of my cats is a bit skittish around people, we've never had any problem with the cat attacking my niece becuause my niece HAS been taught not to torment the cat. It is as easy as that. -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 05:26 PM)
You rezzed a 2 year old thread about a woman who certainly wasn't raising her kids right and was tormenting a poor cat
Someone who chooses to have children AND take care of an animal should first educate the children so that they do not provoke the animal into attacking them.
Watch the particular episode before you comment, dummy. That kid was fine. He was a sweet kid who never abused the cat. The cat was abusing him.
This is what I mean. You cat ladies are all so biased you're making stuff up that never happened on the episode. What the fck is wrong with you? You all sound alike. You're morons all sharing the same substandard brain.
Now I'll get silence, I bet. -
AnnotatedSPN — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 05:50 PM)
Interesting how you don't defend the fact that you STILL rezzed a 2 year old thread in order to prove yourself "better" than "cat ladies".
Now, let me educate you:
Animals in general are territorial. That includes humans, btw. When an animal has PTSD from previous mishandling (and it's been a LONG time since I Saw the episode, so I may be missremembering but the cat was a rescue animal, wasn't he?) the FIRST thing one learns is to give them their space. And that includes NOT PLAYING in the exact same room that the animal has chosen as his safe space (because if the animal is under the bed? He is hiding from danger. He is protecting itself)
Simple ettiquete around animals is not that hard.
What would've been WRONG is to teach the kid that he had the right to do whatever he wanted around the cat, and then get rid of the cat just because the kid can't be taught something as simple as "don't pester the cat". -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 20, 2016 06:29 PM)
Interesting how you don't defend the fact that you STILL rezzed a 2 year old thread in order to prove yourself "better" than "cat ladies".
There's nothing wrong with doing that. Old threads on imdb are rejoined all the time. I was in the neighborhood to answer someone who answered me on another thread, and I couldn't resist.
Sounds like you are somewhat familiar with the episode. If you know it, tell us which one it is. Skeksis Girl thinks I made it up.
When an animal has PTSD from previous mishandling the FIRST thing one learns is to give them their space.
The cat was blind and it had PTSD, but not from human mishandling. The five year old boy tried to pet it just as a really loud noise from a truck occurred (they were outside). If you can believe Jackson, this one event caused the cat to be nervous with PTSD and violent from then on.
While some young children do abuse pets, this wasn't the case here at all.
the FIRST thing one learns is to give them their space. And that includes NOT PLAYING in the exact same room that the animal has chosen as his safe space (because if the animal is under the bed? He is hiding from danger. He is protecting itself)
It's the boy's room. He should have to move out for an animal? Should he sleep on the couch? No. Keep the animal out of his room.
The parents did nothing to separate cat and boy, and protect their son. -
SkeksisGirl — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 05:22 PM)
If the mother did not teach the kid proper etiquette around animals. And the kid did something to have the animal attack him. It is not the animal's fault.
When I was five I scared the living crap out of my dog because I went to kiss him when he was sleeping. His tooth went through my lip, I needed stitches and I still have a scar from it.
It wasn't the dog's fault I was an idiot.
"I'm taking Mary home."
"You're what?"
"Mary's taking me home."
"Better." -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 05:31 PM)
If the mother did not teach the kid proper etiquette around animals. And the kid did something to have the animal attack him. It is not the animal's fault.
Did you watch the episode? No, you couldn't have. Because you have the facts wrong. Or else you're in deep denial like the rest of these people.
The kid on the episode did nothing to provoke the cat. He merely sat on the floor playing quietly in his room. The cat stalked him repeatedly from under the bed and attacked him, scratching and biting. For no reason. -
SkeksisGirl — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 06:39 PM)
You never said which episode it was. If it was the one with the Cat that had PTSD and was partially blind, still not the cat's fault.
YOU are the one who keeps making claims but not giving us details.
So don't give us crap when you can't even provide details.
"I'm taking Mary home."
"You're what?"
"Mary's taking me home."
"Better." -
SapphEyeR — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 07:11 PM)
We've been through this before. You guys don't really want details because then you'll have to admit to something you don't want to admit to. You'd rather just remain in ignorance so you can keep believing that the kid provoked the cat.
I don't remember what the cat's name or the kid's name was or what the episode number was and season was. Who cares? I gave accurate the details. You just don't want to accept that pet attacks can be unprovoked and that a mother and father didn't protect their young child.
You can find the episode if you look elsewhere in the thread, nunchucks, or whatever that idiot is called, identified it. She is in denial about the details, too. She'd rather just blame the kid, it's makes her more comfortable.
Cat ladies.