Shut Up and Dance - Conflicted emotions
-
Ringworm7 — 9 years ago(October 22, 2016 06:21 PM)
it's implied that Kenny and the man he killed are both pedophiles, not hebephiles. Kenny looks about 17, and if he jerked off to teen pics that would be hebephile and not so strange for his age. pedophiles get off only from pre-pubescent children, under 10-11 basically.
child porn exploits children by making sexualized images of them in the first place. that's why I hate the "toddlers and tiaras" type shows, poor kids.
7even days
-
Mehki_Girl — 9 years ago(October 31, 2016 07:31 PM)
Yes, because by consuming it, you create a market for it. Frankly, if you are attracted to children then you are a potential danger to children and from where most parents sit, then you are a danger to children. No one is going to make fine lines of distinction about the kind and type of kiddie porn someone likes to whack off to.
http://www.auplod.com/u/dalpuo430da.png
(\ v /)
(='.'=) -
Todd_B — 9 years ago(October 22, 2016 10:05 PM)
Actually legalization of child pornography lowers the rates of child abuse. Just like the legalization of adult pornography lowers the rates of rape.
Legalization of digital (digital meaning animated, with no real people involved) child pornography would be victimless and would probably save endless thousands of kids from being abused since perpetrators would have an alternative.
http://healthland.time.com/2010/12/02/study-making-pornography-more-accessible-may-curb-child-abuse/
http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/everyday_economics/2006/10/how_the_web_prevents_rape.html -
emavo — 9 years ago(October 22, 2016 10:24 PM)
Okay first, you should really cite raw data as a source to back up claims and not articles that fail to actually link the referenced studies in some way and don't get into any of the nitty gritty of the so-called experiments and data collection. Second, half of the Times article talks about how, in the opinion of an expert in the field, that the data in no way makes child pornography condonable. I can't comment further on these claims because I have no way to examine the "facts" presented and how they were obtained.
On the second point, I'm not sure what you mean by digital child pornography. -
laurendorward-990-190608 — 9 years ago(October 23, 2016 01:27 AM)
What a load of nonsense. You do realise that children will still be being abused and harmed so the pornography is made.
It's not a victimless crime. The kids in the videos and photos are real. -
leiastarkiller — 9 years ago(October 23, 2016 07:22 PM)
Oh I'm sure you'd love videos of your children being raped to be legally distributed so thousands of pedos can jerk off to them against their will. What an absolutely appalling idea. Reading the paragraph you wrote made me feel physically sick. Seriously re-evaluate your life and your use on this planet if you think child porn should be legalized.
-
Todd_B — 9 years ago(October 23, 2016 07:24 PM)
I said digital child pornography. Assume legalization of digital child pornography (all animated, no real people involved) lowered the rates of child sexual abuse by 10-20%. That means tens of millions of children who will not be abused.
Pornography provides a substitute for people's sexual urges. That is why when it is legalized the rates of sex crimes drop. -
leiastarkiller — 9 years ago(October 23, 2016 08:15 PM)
Well a digital image isn't necessarily animated. It could just mean a digital photograph. If you're only talking about animations with no actual children involved then I'm not as disgusted as I thought. It's still gross but no victims in that case.
-
laurendorward-990-190608 — 9 years ago(October 24, 2016 12:55 AM)
Wouldn't work. They'd get bored of it and it would just stir up feelings for the real thing.
Pornography makes sexual urges worse.
The only real solution is chemical castration, and that wouldn't really work for female pedophiles. -
MissMisanthropist — 9 years ago(October 28, 2016 05:26 PM)
Chemical castration doesn't always work for males either. A lot of them have reported still having the urges despite the fact that they can't get aroused. The thing is that it is possible, POSSIBLE, to treat people who are pedophiles and have never offended. The PROBLEM is that more than likely they will eventually offend because the material only holds them for so long. Though it's interesting you brought up female pedophiles. This show seemed to completely ignore the fact that any person other than a man could be a pervert or unfaithful or whatever which annoyed me.
