Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Only on IMDb…

Only on IMDb…

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
25 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    The_Icon_0410 — 9 years ago(November 10, 2016 03:06 AM)

    This website is honest, that's all. This film is not as great as RT thinks it is. Simple.
    "But I have infinite tenderness for you. I always will. My whole life."

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      emvan — 9 years ago(November 10, 2016 11:19 PM)

      Right, because the opinion of ten or twenty people who have that opinion and started negative threads here outweighs the 3100 who have given it an 8.5 so far and the 153 critics whose average 8.5 score has it as the second best film of the year.
      Prepare your minds for a new scale of physical, scientific values, gentlemen.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        uncleroger — 9 years ago(November 18, 2016 02:41 PM)

        Honesty does not make up for incompetence.
        Any profile which has given votes that are mostly 1/10 or 2/10 and 9/10 or 10/10 should have all their reviews invalidated.
        It genuinely means you are incapable of thinking objectively.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          emvan — 9 years ago(November 10, 2016 11:24 PM)

          Nothing at all wrong with IMDB.
          This movie will end up with more than 100,000 IMDB votes. It's no surprise that there will be twenty or thirty people who disliked it and feel compelled to start threads which consist of nothing more than "this sucked."
          Now, an honest thread that attempts to identify flaws and weaknesses is always interesting and valuable. Rare as hell, though.
          These boards would benefit hugely from upvote / downvote buttons.
          Prepare your minds for a new scale of physical, scientific values, gentlemen.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            rockk_th — 9 years ago(November 22, 2016 12:36 PM)

            u mean 30000 from 100k for sure, u shill.
            join us www.server.lineage2media.com

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              Snarkpanda — 9 years ago(November 10, 2016 11:30 PM)

              The comments/message board of any website is as close as you can get to the 7th circle of hell as you can get
              You dont need a grain of salt to navigate the waters more like a block of it .sorry for the mixed metaphors

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                The_ROUSes — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 12:00 AM)

                A movie carries a 100% on Rotten Tomatoes with 58 reviews, and the atmosphere on its IMDb board is still overwhelmingly negative.
                What is it about this website in particular that attracts so much cynicism?
                Ya. Those 58 people, and all of RT, know what people should and shouldn't like. Their opinion is supreme and everyone should follow it.
                Rodents of Unusual Size?I don't think they exist.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  grindovermatter — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 08:53 AM)

                  Way to miss the point.
                  http://www.pro-rock.com/

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    The_ROUSes — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 08:57 AM)

                    Way to miss the point.
                    OK. Then please tell me the point of what you said.
                    Rodents of Unusual Size?I don't think they exist.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      grindovermatter — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 09:07 AM)

                      Look, I post on a lot of film boards. On any other board, when a film carries that much positive buzz prior to release the general consensus among the posters is excitement and optimism. Whether or not individual posters enjoy the film after its release is another story.
                      On IMDb though, a film receives universal acclaim and the general attitude is: "There's NO way it's THAT good! The critics are taking bribes again!" and anyone who HAS seen the film prior to release is a "shill" for the studio.
                      Having seen the film last night, it's very good but has its problems. I definitely see why it's gotten so much praise, but ultimately I gave it an 8/10 rating; lower than the RT average rating, but would still rank as a positive review for the "Tomato-meter".
                      http://www.pro-rock.com/

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #19

                        nxgn_not_not — 9 years ago(November 16, 2016 01:27 PM)

                        K lotto nutterz on iMDb
                        K?
                        lot elsa-wheres 2 though
                        K?
                        u found a place that makes u com-for-table
                        sweet
                        K?
                        that's yer sweetness
                        thars sum haters though
                        n nyo
                        nuttrz aru
                        so
                        in the states
                        gonna b lotto haters
                        n nutterz
                        u no
                        o
                        as 2 the thread
                        this was way fun
                        might c it 'gain
                        there r strong points
                        n time is difficult
                        but was phun
                        Xo - - 0X

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #20

                          grindovermatter — 9 years ago(November 16, 2016 01:32 PM)

                          Something else you only seem to see on this website; illiterate gibberish. Didn't IMDb used to have active moderators once upon a time?
                          http://www.pro-rock.com/

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #21

                            nxgn_not_not — 9 years ago(November 18, 2016 01:45 PM)

                            hate hate hate
                            so so so nyo sad
                            u tha'
                            as 2 the thread
                            this wuzza fun
                            still might c it again
                            der hund verzehrt mein kind

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #22

                              doorclosed321 — 9 years ago(November 18, 2016 02:19 PM)

                              I usually disagree with critics and hate most things they love and vice versa, however I love this movie

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #23

                                nxgn_not_not — 9 years ago(November 22, 2016 10:59 AM)

                                so so so there 4 u
                                nyo
                                "Contact"
                                wuz jus' so moving
                                pour Moi
                                Laughed - cried - wuz moved
                                Rilly
                                der hund verzehrt mein kind

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #24

                                  rockk_th — 9 years ago(November 22, 2016 12:36 PM)

                                  rottentomatoes is owned by Warner Bros, look at the 78% rating of Ghost Busters, an utterly beep fest of a movie, that s why arrival has a higher score then interstellar, alltough arrival is a boring beep fest.
                                  join us www.server.lineage2media.com

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    fgadmin
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #25

                                    grindovermatter — 9 years ago(November 22, 2016 04:44 PM)

                                    ^ This is exactly the kind of person the thread is about.
                                    http://www.pro-rock.com/

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0

                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups