How I would solve two problems with one plot point.
-
Betaspaniel — 9 years ago(January 29, 2017 01:31 PM)
Instead of having Batman to be the one who is going to make the final strike, it would be better (and more true) if Superman was the one who would defeat Batman and had the final strike to make. He would be standing in front of Batman who lays on the ground with his armor destroyed while Superman is ready to finish the job. But, he would refuse to do that. Therefore, hed prove Batman that he is not what he thought he might be. Therefore, Batman actually comes out as a brilliant mastermind he should be and he becomes Supermans ally in a less shoehorned way.
That's a very good point! Have Superman be active, have him do something to prove he's a good guy. Not just happening to have a mother. -
Flamboyant_Little_Devil — 9 years ago(January 29, 2017 01:31 PM)
P.S. Flamboyant Analist and his pals wont get any response from me if they will start their gay-psycho conversations once again in this post.
Damn, Joby. You are so easily Triggered.
Must be the closet flower in you
"I see you try, I see you fail
Some things will never change" -
mh-newressistance — 9 years ago(January 29, 2017 05:43 PM)
OP is joby ?
well. that's explain a lot
Are you still angry at me because I proved to you that rationality prevails above blatant insults? Also, I think here you just agreeing with Flamboyant Rapist just for the sake of it, since you know that I ain't that joby guy (or girl, or whatever the hell he is), since I have just criticized Batman v Superman and Ben Affleck's Batman - two things that this guy seems to love. -
mh-newressistance — 9 years ago(January 30, 2017 07:00 AM)
why would i angry at you for that, joby ?
So you're not angry that I humiliated you in front of everybody without using vulgar language and insults like you did?
besides my reply to that poster is a question
and i my country a question is not considered as agreeing to something
Your question was then supplemented with the sentence "makes sense." Therefore, it means that you agreed with him. -
yukio14 — 9 years ago(January 30, 2017 02:03 PM)
wow i called you joby and you answer
why you didn't try to deny it anymore ?
So you're not angry that I humiliated you in front of everybody without using vulgar language and insults like you did?
eeewwww what a creepy delusion you got there
could you try to not drag other into your delusion ?
ORE GA NIPPONJIN JANAI! -
mh-newressistance — 9 years ago(January 31, 2017 07:48 AM)
wow i called you joby and you answer
why you didn't try to deny it anymore ?
Because why I should be denying what was already proven to be wrong, pal? This "joby" personage has different preferences than I and he speaks differently. I don't even have to point out why I'm not him and he is not Me.
eeewwww what a creepy delusion you got there
could you try to not drag other into your delusion ?
Don't be angry, sweetheart. After all, the fact that you and your pals (or whoever the hell these angry ninnies are to you) started verbal battle with me on this post, further proves how irrational and aggressive you all are. -
yukio14 — 9 years ago(January 31, 2017 08:43 AM)
Don't be angry, sweetheart. After all, the fact that you and your pals (or whoever the hell these angry ninnies are to you) started verbal battle with me on this post, further proves how irrational and aggressive you all are.
sweetheart ?
eewww again don't drag me into your delusion
there's no verbal battle here
people just simply laughing at you, joby
ORE GA NIPPONJIN JANAI! -
Oubliette-Midas — 9 years ago(January 30, 2017 03:19 PM)
since you know that I ain't that joby guy (or girl, or whatever the hell he is), since I have just criticized Batman v Superman and Ben Affleck's Batman - two things that this guy seems to love.
Perhaps
the mirror has two faces
?
"You are salvage, the flotsam of the void, the property of the Midas Foundation. My property." -
mh-newressistance — 9 years ago(January 29, 2017 05:40 PM)
Is this the person to which you are referring right now?:
http://www.imdb.com/user/ur71452111/
If it is, then even if you are intentionally trying to associate people who you don't like with his persona, couldn't you find someone else to point your finger at? Considering that he has Ben Affleck's Batman as his avatar, I guess it's safe to say that he the fan of Ben Affleck's Batman. Now, sweetheart, I know that rational thinning is quite hard for you (and your friends especially), but at least tr to understand this: If I was this guy, or this guy was me, why would I make such long post in which I: A) Criticize Batman v Superman (the movie which he loves). B) Criticize Ben Affleck's Batman? Didn't you think that it might be stupid to accuse me of being him while I clearly have different preferences in comparison to him, let alone the fact that our speech expressions are different, to say the least? I know you like being stupid, but there are limits to everything. -
Flamboyant_Little_Devil — 9 years ago(January 30, 2017 02:30 PM)
TL;DR
P.S. Flamboyant Analist and his pals wont get any response from me if they will start their gay-psycho conversations once again in this post.
Triggered easily to failure.
There, there Joby.
"I see you try, I see you fail
Some things will never change" -
CichlidAsh — 9 years ago(January 29, 2017 05:47 PM)
P.S. Flamboyant Analist and his pals wont get any response from me if they will start their gay-psycho conversations once again in this post.
I have no idea who you consider to be on that list and to be honest I don't really care if you reply to me or not anyway
It is an interesting alternative take you suggest for the film however the following problems instantly spring to mind. If Batman was treating this simply as a test then it still does not excuse him from murdering Lex henchmen in the Batmobile scene, what if Superman instead of just warning Batman to stop actually decided to hand him into the police? That seems to be not only a very reckless risk on Batman part but also a callous waste of life even if they were working for Lex. If Superman did kill Batman a known vigilantly and given that it was known that Batman branding was getting people killed and it is very probably that it was known he killed people in the Batmobile scene would humanity as a whole even care Superman could easily have passed it off as stopping someone who needed to be stopped or at the very least self defence, this is actually a flaw in Lex plan in the original plot as well. Still an overall interesting alternative plot idea but I think that Batman killing the henchmen just to maintain the out of control image would be very extreme and would portray that Batman is not actually a good guy.
To make a great film you need three things - the script, the script and the script -Alfred Hitchcock -
mh-newressistance — 9 years ago(January 30, 2017 07:04 AM)
I have no idea who you consider to be on that list and to be honest I don't really care if you reply to me or not anyway
As you can see, Flamboyant_Little_Fairy and his pal responded to this post while insulting me without actually saying something regarding the topic. That is why I put this observation.
It is an interesting alternative take you suggest for the film however the following problems instantly spring to mind. If Batman was treating this simply as a test then it still does not excuse him from murdering Lex henchmen in the Batmobile scene, what if Superman instead of just warning Batman to stop actually decided to hand him into the police? That seems to be not only a very reckless risk on Batman part but also a callous waste of life even if they were working for Lex. If Superman did kill Batman a known vigilantly and given that it was known that Batman branding was getting people killed and it is very probably that it was known he killed people in the Batmobile scene would humanity as a whole even care Superman could easily have passed it off as stopping someone who needed to be stopped or at the very least self defence, this is actually a flaw in Lex plan in the original plot as well. Still an overall interesting alternative plot idea but I think that Batman killing the henchmen just to maintain the out of control image would be very extreme and would portray that Batman is not actually a good guy.
I should've specified that this plot point means that the entire story of the film would be re-arranged so that the rest of the plot can connect with it. Batman would come out as psycho in the subjective way, but not in the actuality. He'd seem as such only to audiences and Superman. It would be only pretense, as oppose to him being actually murderous psycho. -
Flamboyant_Little_Devil — 9 years ago(January 30, 2017 02:32 PM)
As you can see, Flamboyant_Little_Fairy and his pal responded to this post while insulting me
awwwww Joby don't be such a sore loser. Insulting goes both ways; and you know all about that.
"I see you try, I see you fail
Some things will never change" -
mh-newressistance — 9 years ago(January 31, 2017 07:51 AM)
awwwww Joby
I know that you just clowning around, but can you factually prove that I'm him?
You know, when you put half-naked gay men as your avatar, and you sent kissing emojis to random guys, people might start question your sexuality. (Just a thought, you know.)