Last
-
chumbawampa — 1 month ago(February 13, 2026 03:44 PM)
Melton1 said...
‘Battle’ made less than it cost to make and distribute, it’s therefore a box office failure, and pointing to some other failures (assuming your data is accurate) doesn’t detract from that.
Your bizarre pivot to attacking Sydney Sweeney shows that you're another butthurt faggot Leftist on a gaslighting agenda. You failed, but have you considered joining The Sisters?
‘Battle’ made less than it cost to make and distribute, it’s therefore a box office failure, and pointing to some other failures (assuming your data is accurate) doesn’t detract from that.
All Hollywood movies have been doing poorly at the box office.
Smashing Machine was a huge disappointment. The list goes on. I'm not just picking on Sydney Sweeney. It's a trend. People just aren't going to the theaters AS MUCH as they used to anymore. They're just watching stuff on their big screen LED TV's.
One Battle After Another was basically one of the few to break even. Setting aside Marvel MCU and DC MCU crap, or the new Avatar movies (crap).
When it comes to actual good movies, serious, good movies by real directors… They aren't doing well at the Box Office in 2025-2026. Multiple actors and directors have spoken out about it.
How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? -
Melton1 — 1 month ago(February 13, 2026 11:04 PM)
chumbawampa said...
‘Battle’ made less than it cost to make and distribute, it’s therefore a box office failure, and pointing to some other failures (assuming your data is accurate) doesn’t detract from that.
All Hollywood movies have been doing poorly at the box office.
Smashing Machine was a huge disappointment. The list goes on. I'm not just picking on Sydney Sweeney. It's a trend. People just aren't going to the theaters AS MUCH as they used to anymore. They're just watching stuff on their big screen LED TV's.
One Battle After Another was basically one of the few to break even. Setting aside Marvel MCU and DC MCU crap, or the new Avatar movies (crap).
When it comes to actual good movies, serious, good movies by real directors… They aren't doing well at the Box Office in 2025-2026. Multiple actors and directors have spoken out about it.
expand
‘Battle’ made less than it cost to make and distribute, it’s therefore a box office failure, and pointing to some other failures (assuming your data is accurate) doesn’t detract from that.
The reason movies are doing badly is because they’re Woke garbage. When Hollywood makes good non-Woke films like Top Gun: Maverick they make bank. Wokists have killed movies. -
chumbawampa — 1 month ago(February 17, 2026 04:52 PM)
Melton1 said...
‘Battle’ made less than it cost to make and distribute, it’s therefore a box office failure, and pointing to some other failures (assuming your data is accurate) doesn’t detract from that.
The reason movies are doing badly is because they’re Woke garbage. When Hollywood makes good non-Woke films like Top Gun: Maverick they make bank. Wokists have killed movies.
"The reason movies are doing badly is because they’re Woke garbage."
Really? That doesn't explain why Sydney Sweeney's movies are bombing. She's supposed to be your cheerleader standard bearer for the anti-woke /conservative right, after taking that brave stand with her 'jeans' ad. And then having a vapid no-response to a question.
Still her movies are bombing. So, why is that?
Why don't you give me an example of a "Non Woke" movie? I'd love to hear some. I'd love to eviscerate them.
What recent movies AREN'T woke, according to you? There must be some, otherwise you can't even define what 'woke' is if no alternative exists.
Better yet, I just googled "Non woke movies 2025" so you don't have to.
1st result:- The SpongeBob Movie: Search for SquarePants
- Predator: Badlands
- The Naked Gun
Really extremely ****ty derivative remakes.
I think that solidifies my point: That there is no real definition of what is 'woke' and what isn't, and you have not a single clue what you are talking about.
How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
-
Melton1 — 2 weeks ago(March 14, 2026 12:51 PM)
chumbawampa said...
"The reason movies are doing badly is because they’re Woke garbage."
Really? That doesn't explain why Sydney Sweeney's movies are bombing. She's supposed to be your cheerleader standard bearer for the anti-woke /conservative right, after taking that brave stand with her 'jeans' ad. And then having a vapid no-response to a question.
Still her movies are bombing. So, why is that?
Why don't you give me an example of a "Non Woke" movie? I'd love to hear some. I'd love to eviscerate them.
What recent movies AREN'T woke, according to you? There must be some, otherwise you can't even define what 'woke' is if no alternative exists.
Better yet, I just googled "Non woke movies 2025" so you don't have to.
1st result:- The SpongeBob Movie: Search for SquarePants
- Predator: Badlands
- The Naked Gun
Really extremely shitty derivative remakes.
I think that solidifies my point: That there is no real definition of what is 'woke' and what isn't, and you have not a single clue what you are talking about.
expand
Really? That doesn't explain why Sydney Sweeney's movies are bombing.
They’re not, she’s very successful, and in any case you’re assuming that a Sweeney movie can’t be woke. Stupid and irrelevant point
️
She's supposed to be your cheerleader standard bearer for the anti-woke /conservative right, after taking that brave stand with her 'jeans' ad.
Straw bullshit. Nothing to do with my argument️
Still her movies are bombing. So, why is that?
They’re not, straw question.
Why don't you give me an example of a "Non Woke" movie? I'd love to hear some. I'd love to eviscerate them.
They’re hard to find these days which is the point, but Top Gun: Maverick would be an example (as I’ve already mentioned and you ignored). Go for it.
What recent movies AREN'T woke, according to you? There must be some, otherwise you can't even define what 'woke' is if no alternative exists.
Top Gun: Maverick
Better yet, I just googled "Non woke movies 2025" so you don't have to.
1st result: - The SpongeBob Movie: Search for SquarePants
- Predator: Badlands
- The Naked Gun
Really extremely ****ty derivative remakes.
Haven’t seen the first two, and by all accounts Badlands has an empowered female droid and is PG-13, so it’s gay. SpongeBob is some kids film, no idea. Naked Gun was moderately funny and did fine at the box office️
I think that solidifies my point: That there is no real definition of what is 'woke' and what isn't, and you have not a single clue what you are talking about.
OK you’ve now pivoted to a new ‘point’ which is the tired old ‘there’s no definition of woke’ sophistry. You already know full well what your Woke cult is.
Woke is Gay Race Communism in which straight white males, regardless of how they behave, are identified as the ultimate evil oppressors who must be demeaned/persecuted/killed. Minorities and women are ‘the oppressed’, the more intersectional oppression points you have the more oppressed you are - so a black lesbian would be ultra-oppressed, a straight Latina slightly less so, a white woman only marginally oppressed.
The ‘oppressed’ are encouraged to demean, persecute, steal from and kill the ‘oppressors’ and doing so is called Social Justice. Hence the murder of an exemplary young man like Charlie Kirk is celebrated by the Left, whereas the accidental death of a violent black thug, George Floyd, sends shockwaves through Leftist media. The criminal is celebrated as a Saint and his accidental killer sent to jail. Stories like the murder of Iryna Zarutska by a black thug are also embarrassingly hidden by the Leftist media, until they go viral on Twitter thanks to Elon (which is why Leftists hate him)
You already know all this of course - you’re clearly a devotee of this sick ideology trying your best to obfuscate its true nature - but I’m printing it here just in case anyone isn’t clear on it, it’s good to have a refresher occasionally.
-
chumbawampa — 2 weeks ago(March 14, 2026 01:18 PM)
Melton1 said...
Really? That doesn't explain why Sydney Sweeney's movies are bombing.
They’re not, she’s very successful, and in any case you’re assuming that a Sweeney movie can’t be woke. Stupid and irrelevant point️
She's supposed to be your cheerleader standard bearer for the anti-woke /conservative right, after taking that brave stand with her 'jeans' ad.
Straw bullshit. Nothing to do with my argument️
Still her movies are bombing. So, why is that?
They’re not, straw question.
Why don't you give me an example of a "Non Woke" movie? I'd love to hear some. I'd love to eviscerate them.
They’re hard to find these days which is the point, but Top Gun: Maverick would be an example (as I’ve already mentioned and you ignored). Go for it.
What recent movies AREN'T woke, according to you? There must be some, otherwise you can't even define what 'woke' is if no alternative exists.
Top Gun: Maverick
Better yet, I just googled "Non woke movies 2025" so you don't have to.
1st result:- The SpongeBob Movie: Search for SquarePants
- Predator: Badlands
- The Naked Gun
Really extremely shitty derivative remakes.
Haven’t seen the first two, and by all accounts Badlands has an empowered female droid and is PG-13, so it’s gay. SpongeBob is some kids film, no idea. Naked Gun was moderately funny and did fine at the box office️
I think that solidifies my point: That there is no real definition of what is 'woke' and what isn't, and you have not a single clue what you are talking about.
OK you’ve now pivoted to a new ‘point’ which is the tired old ‘there’s no definition of woke’ sophistry. You already know full well what your Woke cult is.
Woke is Gay Race Communism in which straight white males, regardless of how they behave, are identified as the ultimate evil oppressors who must be demeaned/persecuted/killed. Minorities and women are ‘the oppressed’, the more intersectional oppression points you have the more oppressed you are - so a black lesbian would be ultra-oppressed, a straight Latina slightly less so, a white woman only marginally oppressed.
The ‘oppressed’ are encouraged to demean, persecute, steal from and kill the ‘oppressors’ and doing so is called Social Justice. Hence the murder of an exemplary young man like Charlie Kirk is celebrated by the Left, whereas the accidental death of a violent black thug, George Floyd, sends shockwaves through Leftist media. The criminal is celebrated as a Saint and his accidental killer sent to jail. Stories like the murder of Iryna Zarutska by a black thug are also embarrassingly hidden by the Leftist media, until they go viral on Twitter thanks to Elon (which is why Leftists hate him)
You already know all this of course - you’re clearly a devotee of this sick ideology trying your best to obfuscate its true nature - but I’m printing it here just in case anyone isn’t clear on it, it’s good to have a refresher occasionally.
expand
No, I really, genuinely am not a devotee of any woke ideology. Considering I just made a post mocking the entire LGBTQ2 community.
Why would I care about Charlie Kirk? Innocent people get shot all the time every day which you don't give a **** about.
As for Top Gun… My answer to that is:
Cheap, crotch grabbing 80s nostalgia? Push It To The Limit? And Twisted Sister?
So, pretending its the 80s and being unable to move on from a long bygone era is the definition of a non-woke movie? I suppose mullets are a requirement.
Get a white guy with a mullet, make him kill a bunch of stuff, and whatever you do, make sure that there are no black or non-white people in prominent roles.
Sure, The Thing (1982) had Keith David in it, and T. K. Carter. Two black actors. But that's OK! It's not woke. Since it was made in the 80s.
And Blade & Spawn in the 90s were totally OK. Everyone was cool with those when they came out… Where were you then? Where was the outrage? And Jessica Alba in Fantastic Four playing a white blonde Sue Storm? Where was the outrage in 2005? You weren't outraged because you hadn't jumped onto the MAGA bandwagon yet, and no one was crying 'woke' about anything.
Despite more black people starting in lead roles and headlining entire movies back then. Ever notice that?
How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
-
Melton1 — 2 weeks ago(March 14, 2026 02:27 PM)
chumbawampa said...
No, I really, genuinely am not a devotee of any woke ideology. Considering I just made a post mocking the entire LGBTQ2 community.
Why would I care about Charlie Kirk? Innocent people get shot all the time every day which you don't give a shit about.
As for Top Gun… My answer to that is:
Cheap, crotch grabbing 80s nostalgia? Push It To The Limit? And Twisted Sister?
So, pretending its the 80s and being unable to move on from a long bygone era is the definition of a non-woke movie? I suppose mullets are a requirement.
Get a white guy with a mullet, make him kill a bunch of stuff, and whatever you do, make sure that there are no black or non-white people in prominent roles.
Sure, The Thing (1982) had Keith David in it, and T. K. Carter. Two black actors. But that's OK! It's not woke. Since it was made in the 80s.
And Blade & Spawn in the 90s were totally OK. Everyone was cool with those when they came out… Where were you then? Where was the outrage? And Jessica Alba in Fantastic Four playing a white blonde Sue Storm? Where was the outrage in 2005? You weren't outraged because you hadn't jumped onto the MAGA bandwagon yet, and no one was crying 'woke' about anything.
Despite more black people starting in lead roles and headlining entire movies back then. Ever notice that?
expand
You asked for an example of a recent non-Woke movie and I gave it to you - Top Gun: Maverick. It was a roaring success because it was excellent and non-Woke. All of the diversionary drivel you just wrote about it doesn’t change that fact.
Then you pivot to the tired old Leftist sophistry of trying to label older films, which aren’t Woke, as ‘Woke’. You pretend that Woke = the mere presence of non-whites in a film (eg The Thing), this is false - you already know the meaning of Woke, and in any case I spelled it out in my previous reply.
So once again you’ve just humiliated yourself by tossing out the same old sophistry, which everyone can see through. You’re a Wokist on damage control on behalf of your cult, and you’ve failed miserably. -
chumbawampa — 2 weeks ago(March 14, 2026 02:42 PM)
Melton1 said...
You asked for an example of a recent non-Woke movie and I gave it to you - Top Gun: Maverick. It was a roaring success because it was excellent and non-Woke. All of the diversionary drivel you just wrote about it doesn’t change that fact.
Then you pivot to the tired old Leftist sophistry of trying to label older films, which aren’t Woke, as ‘Woke’. You pretend that Woke = the mere presence of non-whites in a film (eg The Thing), this is false - you already know the meaning of Woke, and in any case I spelled it out in my previous reply.
So once again you’ve just humiliated yourself by tossing out the same old sophistry, which everyone can see through. You’re a Wokist on damage control on behalf of your cult, and you’ve failed miserably.
expand
'sophistry', I had to google that.
No, I still don't know the meaning of Woke.
The only thing I've gathered from this entire debate is that woke doesn't exist, and all the anti-woke sentiment is just a knee jerk conservative reaction to things you don't like in a movie.
How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? -
Melton1 — 2 weeks ago(March 15, 2026 12:52 AM)
chumbawampa said...
'sophistry', I had to google that.
No, I still don't know the meaning of Woke.
The only thing I've gathered from this entire debate is that woke doesn't exist, and all the anti-woke sentiment is just a knee jerk conservative reaction to things you don't like in a movie.
Perhaps if you knew what sophistry was you’d be able to catch yourself engaging in it and stop before you publicly out yourself as a low IQ deceiver.
As for Woke, a recent tweet by Millennial Woes really captures your strategy here: ‘
It's amazing how much leftist discourse is just them pretending not to understand things, thus making discourse impossible
.‘
Even though you’re
pretending
not to understand Woke, let’s go over it again…
Woke is Gay Race Communism in which straight white males, regardless of how they behave, are identified as the ultimate evil oppressors who must be demeaned/persecuted/killed. Minorities and women are ‘the oppressed’, the more intersectional oppression points you have the more oppressed you are - so a black lesbian would be ultra-oppressed, a straight Latina slightly less so, a white woman only marginally oppressed.
The ‘oppressed’ are encouraged to demean, persecute, steal from and kill the ‘oppressors’ and doing so is called Social Justice. Hence the murder of an exemplary young man like Charlie Kirk is celebrated by the Left, whereas the accidental death of a violent black thug, George Floyd, sends shockwaves through Leftist media. The criminal is celebrated as a Saint and his accidental killer sent to jail. Stories like the murder of Iryna Zarutska by a black thug are also embarrassingly hidden by the Leftist media, until they go viral on Twitter thanks to Elon (which is why Leftists hate him)
You already know all this of course - you’re clearly a devotee of this sick ideology trying your best to obfuscate its true nature - but I’m printing it here just in case anyone isn’t clear on it, it’s good to have a refresher occasionally. -
chumbawampa — 2 weeks ago(March 15, 2026 10:56 AM)
Melton1 said...
Perhaps if you knew what sophistry was you’d be able to catch yourself engaging in it and stop before you publicly out yourself as a low IQ deceiver.
As for Woke, a recent tweet by Millennial Woes really captures your strategy here: ‘
It's amazing how much leftist discourse is just them pretending not to understand things, thus making discourse impossible
.‘
Even though you’re
pretending
not to understand Woke, let’s go over it again…
Woke is Gay Race Communism in which straight white males, regardless of how they behave, are identified as the ultimate evil oppressors who must be demeaned/persecuted/killed. Minorities and women are ‘the oppressed’, the more intersectional oppression points you have the more oppressed you are - so a black lesbian would be ultra-oppressed, a straight Latina slightly less so, a white woman only marginally oppressed.
The ‘oppressed’ are encouraged to demean, persecute, steal from and kill the ‘oppressors’ and doing so is called Social Justice. Hence the murder of an exemplary young man like Charlie Kirk is celebrated by the Left, whereas the accidental death of a violent black thug, George Floyd, sends shockwaves through Leftist media. The criminal is celebrated as a Saint and his accidental killer sent to jail. Stories like the murder of Iryna Zarutska by a black thug are also embarrassingly hidden by the Leftist media, until they go viral on Twitter thanks to Elon (which is why Leftists hate him)
You already know all this of course - you’re clearly a devotee of this sick ideology trying your best to obfuscate its true nature - but I’m printing it here just in case anyone isn’t clear on it, it’s good to have a refresher occasionally.
expand
Well, I honestly don't give a **** about straight white males.
I'm a straight white male. We don't need special protection.
I don't identify with being a white person. I identify being English, Scottish heritage, and Canadian. That's the way I define myself. Not by being 'white'.
I don't wake up ever, thinking "I'm white! I feel great about my whiteness today!"
What I consider my identity is my Canadian heritage, our history of fighting in WW2, on the beaches of Normandy on D Day, when we fought back American incursions in the War of 1812. And when we tried but failed to stop the Rwandan Genocide. That's where I come from, who my people are, and what I stand for. Not my 'whiteness' or something so trivial as my skintone. If that's all that is important to you, that's fine. To me, there's a lot more to humanity than that, and there's more to my country, my people, and my history than simply being 'white'.
How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? -
buffydeftones — 1 month ago(February 17, 2026 05:36 AM)
chumbawampa said...
One Battle After Another
Box office
$208.3 million
Box office failure? I think not.
Here are some real box office failures:
Sydney Sweeney's Christy
Box office
$2 million
Eden (Also Sydney Sweeney)
Box office
$2.5 million
(Budget: $55 million)
= $ 50.25 million loss
Sydney Sweeney is a BOMB factory. She is, as Norm Macdonald would say, box office poison.
expand
House Maid $334 Million worldwide
Everyone knew her lesbian boxer biopic would bomb -
azn_2 — 1 month ago(February 17, 2026 05:37 AM)
buffydeftones said...
House Maid $334 Million worldwide
Everyone knew her lesbian boxer biopic would bomb
Go get dojo'd you fcking bots.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race,_Evolution,_and_Behavior -
Melton1's dad — 2 months ago(January 25, 2026 03:10 AM)
Melton1 said...
Great - it confirms the long held theory that the awards are in fact run by sad deranged Woke-ass Leftists who reward films for showcasing Woke propaganda rather than merit.
Not the answer you wanted, huh?
Fortunately the public were not swayed and it remains a box office flop. How does that make you feel, faggot?
Melton1, I am going to molest you like I always did when you were young. -
Melton1 — 2 months ago(January 26, 2026 02:11 AM)
Melton1's dad said...
Melton1, I am going to molest you like I always did when you were young.
What’s it like being a creepy ****** who pretends to be a ‘dad’ to gain sexual access to children?
Do you have anything to contribute to the movie discussion at hand, or shall we assume you’re just another Leftist butthurt over the box office failure of OBAA? -
Melton1's dad — 2 months ago(January 31, 2026 09:11 PM)
Melton1 said...
What’s it like being a creepy faggot who pretends to be a ‘dad’ to gain sexual access to children?
Do you have anything to contribute to the movie discussion at hand, or shall we assume you’re just another Leftist butthurt over the box office failure of OBAA?
I am going to punish you by molesting you like I did when you were young. Your mom will not be watching this time because of the advanced stage of her ALS. -
Melton1 — 2 months ago(February 01, 2026 12:52 PM)
Melton1's dad said...
I am going to punish you by molesting you like I did when you were young. Your mom will not be watching this time because of the advanced stage of her ALS.
What’s it like being a creepy ****** who pretends to be a ‘dad’ to gain sexual access to children?
Do you have anything to contribute to the movie discussion at hand, or shall we assume you’re just another Leftist butthurt over the box office failure of OBAA? -
Melton1 — 2 months ago(February 01, 2026 12:57 PM)
Hey stalker-******,
You’re all signed up to The Sisters now. You’re now immortalised alongside your fellow predatory homosexuals and pedophiles. Enjoy!
https://www.filmboards.com/board/p/3593415/