Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. "Kill De sac"

"Kill De sac"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
18 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    cdjunkee-1 — 10 years ago(June 02, 2015 06:40 PM)

    Whoa really? I sometimes wonder about these shows because you get it from two points of view. We as the viewer only have the program to go by. (unless we Google it I guess)
    ~Keep on Trucking!~

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      GraceFromSoCal — 10 years ago(June 02, 2015 06:35 PM)

      I just watched it. Wow. He got off without even a slap on the wrist. Amazing.
      If the Dad's blood alcohol level was high, as another post in this thread says, that should have worked AGAINST the military guy, because it would mean the Dad wasn't in full control of his faculties. Therefore, military guy should've used MORE caution when dealing with him.
      At any rate, I believe the jury got it horribly wrong. Killing an unarmed, drunk man in cold blood should yield SOMETHING in terms of punishment.
      http://www.CaliforniaDreamsPhotography.com

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        cdjunkee-1 — 10 years ago(June 02, 2015 06:49 PM)

        There was a similar case where a drunk teenager had sneaked into his neighbors home via an open window. He was heading up the stairs when the neighbor shot him thinking he was an intruder. I believe in both cases the homicide was justifiable.
        the Dad being drunk doesn't give him the right to barge into someone's home all irate. He warned him not to come in. Because someone is drunk doesn't make them any less harmful. According to the other poster the Dad had barged in other times also.
        Anyway that's just my 2 cents.
        ~Keep on Trucking!~

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          aac7294 — 10 years ago(June 03, 2015 11:30 AM)

          I have to wonder how factual some of this stuff isthey kept referring to the Military Man as working for the Department of Homeland Security. The tragic shooting took place in 1995 long before 9/11 and the subsequent CREATION of the Department of Homeland Security.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            Tornado-chaser — 10 years ago(June 03, 2015 02:08 PM)

            Yea my understanding was that he worked for FEMA. The skateboarding kid who gave CPR to the Dad said the Military man invited him into the house and the Dad said something like "No you come outside so I can kick your ass."
            Yes that sounds like something a drunk person might say or even a drunk bully. In fact he said the Dad actually encouraged him to skateboard on Military man's property, looking for a fight. But how that warranted lethal force is beyond me. Again I can't believe they didn't at least get Military man for manslaughter against the unarmed man. I guess FEMA man had money or strong connections, even a year later when Princess Leah just stood outside to visit the site.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              anthonynorris-783-181359 — 10 years ago(June 06, 2015 03:41 PM)

              If the Dad's blood alcohol level was high, as another post in this thread says, that should have worked AGAINST the military guy, because it would mean the Dad wasn't in full control of his faculties. Therefore, military guy should've used MORE caution when dealing with him.
              Most idiotic statement I have ever seen on IMDB and that is saying something.
              Being drunk does not give you the right to go into someone's home and it definitely does not push the burden of putting up with your threats onto a sober person. It actually means that with less 'control of your faculties' the person you are dealing with has more to fear that you are going to overact and escalate the circumstances. This actually gives them more reason to fear a drunk and they can argue that they acted out of that fear.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                cmashieldscapting — 10 years ago(July 27, 2015 12:38 AM)

                Reminded me of this story of another unarmed drunk shot to death in someone's yard (
                not
                entering or trying to enter any home)! http://articles.latimes.com/1994-01-08/news/mn-9728_1_police-investigator These situations are hard to comprehend for people not from the United States. There was also a case of two teenagers who stopped to ask directions to a Halloween party in Louisiana. The homeowner came out with a gun and ordered the boys to freeze, which one did who was not shot. The other was a Japanese tourist who did not understand English, continued to move and so was shot to death. In the Houston case, the victim's mother said she learned the way things are done in Houston is "you never leave anyone alive who can sue."
                In a case in Florida an object, which turned out to be a rock, was hurled against a home. The homeowner thought he was under attack,
                left his property
                and
                attacked the nearest car
                , which contained a group of teenagers who had thrown the rock, killing a 15-year-old boy. (I believe the boy had red hair and was named Danny Adams if anyone wants to look it up.) The homeowner expressed genuine remorse and was let completely off the hook, although no one entered his home or even went onto his property!
                Certain places have a "make my day" law. That is, if anyone is on an owner's property uninvited and does not leave when told, the owner can shoot them just like that. Presumably the other person does not have to be armed or even warned before being shot. Unfair in many ways but it is the law in some places and this jury seems to have decided based on their understanding of such a law if indeed that place had one.
                The neighbor did a terrible thing in making David (whose skateboard entered the property, supposedly accidentally) and Leah (who invited her friends over) feel terrible the rest of their lives for their parts in the death of Leah's father.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  IMDb User

                  This message has been deleted.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    IMDb User

                    This message has been deleted.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      minkysmom82 — 10 years ago(July 29, 2015 09:10 AM)

                      Regardless if it was justified or not, it was so sick that the military man removed the ribbons and called the police on the little girl. At that point a man was dead, and it wasn't hurting anything, nor was it his property.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #13

                        rosemei — 10 years ago(August 11, 2015 05:26 PM)

                        My first thought was military guy should put up one of those high privacy fences. It would keep the kids off his property, deflect any skateboards from landing in his flower bed and deaden the noise. The only disadvantage is he can't stand at his window and spy on the neighbors.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #14

                          WaningMoonMage — 10 years ago(January 06, 2016 10:14 PM)

                          I kind of understood Bob in the beginning, being annoyed by the kids. Their parents could have easily had their kids skateboard somewhere else but it seemed like they were never really paying attention. If someone was yelling at my kids every day I would do something about it.
                          But shooting the neighbor in front of his kids was a cowardly bitch move and he should have been punished. He could have just hit the guy or called the cops like he always did. Not only that, but he has the audacity to remove the ribbon and call the cops when the girl was just sitting outside the house, as if they have no right to be sad about their father's death. I lost all respect for Bob after that because it shows what a miserable narcissistic coward he truly was.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #15

                            adouthit-1 — 10 years ago(November 04, 2015 05:28 AM)

                            Obviously he didn't deserve to die over it but him and the kids seem to not care at all about being respectful of the neighbors and their property and felt they could do whatever they wanted. I can see how it would really piss off the military man. The daughter still sounds like a spoiled brat.
                            I would think the military guy would have gotten some kind of punishment though. That doesn't seem right.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #16

                              WhateverLolaWantsLolaGets — 10 years ago(November 04, 2015 08:02 AM)

                              Team Bob. I'm glad he walked. He didn't deserve manslaughter or anything else. If the circumstances were different, the neighbor would be called a "thug" and everyone would say he deserved it.
                              The dead guy's daughter had a poor attitude and I'm sure she's been like that since she was a kid. Duren Eldridge refused to respect Bob's property boundaries. He refused to speak to the kids about skateboarding in front of Bob's home and landing in his flower bed. Before the Eldridge family got there, no one ever had a problem with Bob Lorenz and they considered him to be a good neighbor. The Eldridge family was from liberal California (we all know Californians ruin every place they move to-ask anyone) and they did not respect the property boundaries of conservative Virginia. I understand why Bob was pissed off. Duren had no right to follow Bob back to his house. He had no right to pound on the door. He had no right to try and gain entry into Bob's home. Leah's description of Leeburg Virginia couldn't be further from the truth. It's right wing but not even close to being "rednecky." Leesburg is very affluent, in one of the most affluent counties in the country- Loudoun County. In fact, Leah looked more like a burned out druggie California redneck. They obviously didn't fit into the neighborhood. Problem number one: there is a lot of classicism in Virginia. Wealthy white collar people do not want blue collar renters in their neighborhoods. Problem two- White collar and blue collar people always have different value systems. Bob and Duren proved this to be true but I've seen it many times. Duren should've kept his drunk ass in his yard and talked to Bob when he was sober. He and his family paid the ultimate price. At least Leah admitted her dad's culpability in his own murder when she said their disagreements should've been handled differently. The Princess Leah promotion at the end was unnecessary and made it seem like she was exploiting her "beloved father's" death to promote her "career".
                              I survived because I was tougher than anybody else.- Bette Davis

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #17

                                IMDb User

                                This message has been deleted.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #18

                                  slidell333 — 9 years ago(January 12, 2017 12:21 PM)

                                  I just watched this episode and I read some of the comments that said the dad was drunkbut still, he didn't have a weapon and could have easily just shut the door if he was truly scared and called the cops AGAIN. He should have gotten some lower charge, at least. Sounds like a grade-A coward. It's easy to pick on kids and yell at them.
                                  That being said I recognize we only get so much of the facts. It seems like he had that "I was here first" and everyone needs to act how I deem appropriate OR ELSE. Not suprisingly, he had no children.
                                  I hope the family filed a wrongful death civil suit and ruined him financially. If this happened in 1995 it was probably before the "Stand your ground" laws that have been popping up over the last decade or so.
                                  I'm so glad I don't live around A-Holes like that. I was once a kid and did similar things in the street. Honestly, if you don't want to deal with kids or basically neighbors as a whole, move out of a neighborhood and to someplace more off the beaten path. Problem solved. I know that ANY time I live in a neighborhood kids or people could move in at anytime and make noise, have parties, etcas long as they're not bothering me or my property I don't care.
                                  The dad should have walked away, but people can only take so much BS, esp. When you have an adult chastising small kids. I'd said the same thing "talk to me that way" not them.
                                  Sad.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0

                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups