None of the Royals pre-Diana has been physically attractive. Was Princess Margaret the exception?
-
CheruthCutestoryII — 9 years ago(January 16, 2017 03:05 PM)
She was cute but not as cute as the actress.
I think Elizabeth was perfectly OK looking. She wasn't really a knockout but she had none of the bad traits of her immediate family. She had a little of the buck tooth thing. But she was always smart to not smile and keep her mouth closed. And it wasn't nearly as prominent as in Charles. She looked like a normal pretty English girl.
I think young Elizabeth was just as attractive as a young Dianna.
Most people thought I was a hero for killing Lydia's parrot. -
vnse — 9 years ago(January 21, 2017 01:36 PM)
You can't judge attractiveness today vs in the 1950s. The standard of what is beautiful changes over time. I think Margaret was good looking, judging by old photos. But definitely not in the same league as the actress who portrays her. But for 1950, maybe she was. It's hard to tell.