Ruth Bader Ginsburg's dying wish
-
Steve Lake β 5 years ago(September 19, 2020 04:55 PM)
I love how involved you are when it comes to me. Your obsession is both creepy and disturbing.
But since your an unemployed shut in , I'm not too worried.
The only poster who had his account banned 4 times without ever breaking any rules each of those times. -
πΈππΎπΈπΆπ πππβπ«ππΎπΈπ
β 5 years ago(September 19, 2020 04:58 PM)Unemployed? I work 40 hours a week and go to Graduate school . Do you think itβs impossible to post from work with computer access and a phone? People do it everyday. Imagine a failed β comedianβ calling somebody unemployed.
"You had me at Elk Tartare"
-Erin Wotherspoon -
PodKast β 5 years ago(September 19, 2020 04:21 AM)
The fact that the late RBG had publicly expressed her desire that President Trump not nominate her replacement is proof positive that the court has become a political instrument rather than the ultimate arbiter of law it was intended to be.
Many people within her circle pleaded with her to retire during Obama's last term. She declined, obviously. My guess is she was just as convinced as every other leftist was that Hillary would follow Obama.
Oops.
Right now decades old sexual assault allegations against possible SCOTUS nominees are being discovered. -
MovieManCin2 β 5 years ago(September 19, 2020 07:37 AM)
Amen!
President Trump should nominate a new judge asap. That's EXACTLY what the hypocritical Democrats would do. And yes, for once
FIGHT FOR AMERICA
, Republicans!
MAGA! FAFO!
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. Dumbocraps: evil people who celebrate murder. 
-
MovieManCin2 β 5 years ago(September 19, 2020 06:31 AM)
Precisely,
and now that decision has come back to
bite the Democrats in the butt.
And decades old sexual assault allegations are now being
fabricated out of thin air!
Keep America Great! Nominate her successor now!
MAGA! FAFO! Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. Dumbocraps: evil people who celebrate murder. -
MovieManCin2 β 5 years ago(September 19, 2020 06:27 AM)
But she's not going to get that, sorry.
President Trump is going to do EXACTLY what the Democrats would do if they controlled the Presidency and the Senate. He's going to put forth a nominee, and get him/her confirmed before the election. That is his
duty
and his
right
as the President. And if the Democrats don't like that, tough.
This is vitally important in keeping this country free. That's one of the main reasons we elected him: to appoint conservative Supreme Court Justices.
This is especially important now. Remember the
"hanging chad"
presidential election of 2000? It took
40 days
, I believe, for the Supreme Court to decided the winner.
The Democrats have already made it known that if they lose, they will refuse to concede, and it could end up again in the Supreme Court. In that case, do we really want an
eight justice
court? A tie vote could bring about a serious
constitutional crisis
. That's why the Supreme Court has
nine
justices.
Not that Democrats give a crap about the Constitution.
Keep America Great!
MAGA! FAFO! Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. Dumbocraps: evil people who celebrate murder. -
DrakeStraw β 5 years ago(September 19, 2020 04:19 PM)
Avatar Lives Matter β¦
Here's my prediction on Trump's action: Nothing before the election, but if he loses or the dems take the Senate, immediate moves to install a new justice.
[center] [hr] [poll multiple] [s] [sic] [sub]2[/sub] [sup]th[/sup] [u]
&
nbsp; -
-
-
MovieManCin2 β 5 years ago(September 21, 2020 07:28 PM)
"Never let a good crisis go to waste."
The Democrats politicize
everything
to advance their radical left agenda, even this woman's death. They are
shameless.
MAGA! FAFO! Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. Dumbocraps: evil people who celebrate murder. -
Vlad. β 5 years ago(September 19, 2020 10:11 PM)
A judge should know the law. And she must have known that the President can legally replace her.
A SCOTUS judge is smart enough to know people. And she must have known this President will replace her.
Stop. -
Soul_Venom β 5 years ago(September 20, 2020 01:43 AM)
As if it would make a difference. It has been months since I last encountered anyone delusional enough to think Trump would be voted out. Just let him pick and be done with it. We cant hold up the nation on one persons wishes.
As for Roe v Wade
Our courts sometimes make mistakes. When that happens you can tell because the furor refused to die down. It remains an issue like a wound that refuses to heal. Take the Dred Scott decision for example. It was the wrong decision and the nation continued to bleed from it until civil war broke out and Lincoln settled the issue. Abortion is another one of those issues.these are children. They are being murdered. It must end.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
Lilith β 5 years ago(September 20, 2020 01:48 AM)
They are not "children," they are fetuses, zygotes. As long as these cells are within the woman's body, it needs to remain within her rights: Her body, her uterus, her choice.
This baffles me. If you are not pro-choice, just raise your children to be anti-choice. But don't invade a stranger's body and think you have any rights to determine what they can or should be able to do.
Make your own choices, and raise your own family with your own values and pass your values down so you teach them what you believe until they can make their own decisions for themselves.
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." β Warren Smith -
Soul_Venom β 5 years ago(September 20, 2020 05:41 PM)
The Nazi's used dehumanizing terms to self justify what they were doing as well.
However technically you are correct. Not that it makes any difference whatsoever. Zygote, fetus, infant, toddler, child, teen, adult, elderly. These are merely terms of developement for what remains A HUMAN BEING. It is wrong to kill an innocent regardless of the stage of developement be it 9 days along or 99 years. This is a separate person with their own unique DNA. Not her body. THEIR body. Her uterus. Irrelevant. Say I invite someone over to my house. It's my house. Doesn't mean I can decide to kill them while they are there.
The Declaration of Independence is the spirit of our Constitution. It states that the purpose of forming our own nation is to promote, in order of importance Life, Liberty & the Pursuit of Happiness. Chief among those is life. Killing inoccent young people for any reason other that the life of the mother being at stake is simply unconscionable.
As for bodily autonomy the law already determines what we can/can not do with our bodies so don't act as though this is anything new or unusual. From drug use to physical assault to experimental medical procedures it is nothing new. Nore is interveining in the lifes of strangers unusual. Doctors and police do that all the time. People save random strangers all the time. I don't know the people being killed. I probably never will. Doesn't matter. Some of them may even grew up to be complete ****ing idiot who join antifa and vote democrat. Doesn't matter. They shouldn't be killed. Period.
conman might have been histories only exception..
Fuck you conman
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
Lilith β 5 years ago(September 20, 2020 06:39 PM)
I'm primarily a conservative, but I have some liberal leanings when it comes to certain things. I support the 2nd amendment for example, and for much the same reason: If someone is "anti-gun" then don't purchase a gun and raise your kids to do the same.
I cannot support any legislation that tries to dictates what a woman can do with her own body. I mean this sincerely, but I don't know if being a man makes it at least a little more challenging for some to grasp the concept of what women face or would have to face. There's also a judgement that women are choosing abortion as first-choice birth control. Who ever said that and why are people so quick to assume that?
Do you understand you are making a decision that will affect that woman for the rest of her life? We make political judgements that affect strangers all the time, but this is a very personal one that affects individual choices about their own bodies. That's very different than laws governing townships or infrastructure.
Why is it so difficult to simply allow this to remain on the books, and for individuals to raise their families to elect to be "anti-choice" if that is how you believe? If you don't want the women in your family to have a choice, then raise them that way.
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." β Warren Smith