Employers can deny birth control for women: religious grounds
-
πΈππΎπΈπΆπ πππβπ«ππΎπΈπ
β 5 years ago(July 08, 2020 08:55 PM)Companies shouldnβt be discriminating based on their religious beliefs or βmoralsβ that have nothing to do with womenβs reproductive health. What about this is hard to grasp?
"You had me at Elk Tartare"
-Erin Wotherspoon -
Lilith β 5 years ago(July 08, 2020 09:04 PM)
I agree with you! I'm livid with this decision. I've made several posts about how I find this appalling. What about that is so hard to grasp?
This tends to happen when I simply post articles that I find on the newsfeed, it doesn't mean I'm agreeing with them, it simply means I am posting them, and I am open to discussion.
I find it unethical that a company can be "protected" under "religious freedom" to project the company owners personal religious feelings onto all of their employees and thereby affect their individual health care. I don't think that's relevant to the work the employee does.
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." β Warren Smith -
Soul_Venom β 5 years ago(July 08, 2020 09:14 PM)
allows employers to restrict access
No. It just says we can't force the employer to pay for it. They are still as free as they were before Obamacare.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
πΈππΎπΈπΆπ πππβπ«ππΎπΈπ
β 5 years ago(July 08, 2020 09:17 PM)Itβs discriminatory based on religious belief no matter what lipstick on a pig semantics you want to add to make a restriction sound like itβs fair.
"You had me at Elk Tartare"
-Erin Wotherspoon -
Soul_Venom β 5 years ago(July 08, 2020 09:24 PM)
So either discriminate against one group or discriminate against another. Except Religion has Consitutional protection and healthcare does not. Employment is a choice. Belief is a choice. If you don't like what your employer is doing, get a different job. Changing a belief is not so easy.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
πΈππΎπΈπΆπ πππβπ«ππΎπΈπ
β 5 years ago(July 08, 2020 09:28 PM)Except Religion has nothing to do with womenβs reproductive health. The two are in no way interconnected except in religious zealotsβ undying need to inject their ideology into every aspect of other peopleβs lives.
Iβm thinking you arenβt grown up enough for this conversation.
"You had me at Elk Tartare"
-Erin Wotherspoon -
Soul_Venom β 5 years ago(July 08, 2020 09:42 PM)
You seem unable to connect how forcing one person to pay for the choices of another, choices they may disagree with, is a violation.
Lets say I was muslim and worked for you. Based on our convo thus far i assume you are atheist. If that is incorrect we are going to pretend it anyway for the purpose of the example. Lets say I come to you and demand that you buy me a prayer rug. True I could get a prayer rug elsewhere and true you don't believe as I do but I am demanding that you be the one to pay for it anyway.
Do you do it?
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
Chase β 5 years ago(July 08, 2020 06:53 PM)
America - "Land of the free (-ish)"
If these companies are concerned that people are interfering with the wishes or Grand Plan of some Sky Mage, then they should stop covering male aids as well. If God wanted her pregnant, then it surely wanted his impotent ass to not procreate.
Proudly offering too-close encounters since 1977. -
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 