Poll: What is more despicable?
-
Yermom_Is_God — 7 years ago(October 10, 2018 12:58 AM)
There was zero evidence. You made up stuff and called it evidence because you're a lying scumbag and a partisan hack.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Fugazi — 7 years ago(October 10, 2018 01:17 AM)
I told you what it was; lying about the meaning of slang terms to appear more innocent, the calendar corroborating Ford's story… these are undeniable… but I am done arguing this. Let's just set this aside and say I agree that there is not enough evidence to say he did it.
It would still be wrong to say she is lying unless there is evidence that she did lie. You should remain neutral if there is no proof of her lying. Lack of evidence does not mean it didn't happen. You can at least agree on that, right?
If I am a partisan hack, why would I disown Al Franken? Are you saying he was conservative?
Same with Louis CK. Not a politician, but a liberal comedian. He's a ****ing creep. I don't know enough about the Clinton allegations to comment, but I have my suspicions about him. I already think what he did with Monica was wrong since he was in a position of power wih her being an intern. But yeah, it's about politics for me.
Stop painting leftists with a broad brush… unless you are trolling and not serious. I do that **** sometimes, but I am trolling when I do so. -
Yermom_Is_God — 7 years ago(October 10, 2018 01:25 AM)
You are aware that what you listed is not evidence, correct? If he did lie about those terms(he didn't, you just want to believe he did because you're a partisan hack), that still is not corroborating evidence. Do you have any idea what corroborating evidence is? You're clearly confused.
I'm not saying she's lying, and I'm not saying he's innocent, I'm saying we shouldn't set a standard that a person is guilty based on nothing but an allegation with no corroborating evidence at all.
It was easy to disown Al Frankenstein, he was in a deep blue district, him losing his seat was safe for Democrats, you get no extra credit for that. You're calling Kavanaugh guilty with zero evidence simply because he's not a liberal activist judge who,will pervert the court with a garbage "progressive" agenda. That makes you a partisan hack.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Yermom_Is_God — 7 years ago(October 10, 2018 01:38 AM)
Fair, but you made it clear that you don't know what evidence means.
Now Ford actually did lie a few times under oath, which you seem to ignore, but that is also not corroborating evidence to support Kavanaugh.
Get it now?
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Fugazi — 7 years ago(October 10, 2018 01:44 AM)
No, I just think your bar is too high for evidence, like people who deny evolution… but I am tired of going back and forth on the same thing. I don't see either of us changing our minds or learning anything new.
Where did she lie? -
Yermom_Is_God — 7 years ago(October 10, 2018 01:51 AM)
My bar is not too high for evidence, your definition of evidence is just very wrong.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Yermom_Is_God — 7 years ago(October 10, 2018 02:05 AM)
Fear of flying, that she never coached anyone on a polygraph, when and why she put in another doorway in her home, and her inability to live in small spaces.
Also, her friend was being pressured by Ford's team to change her story about not recalling the incident.
None of this is evidence to disprove her allegation, though. So, now I taught you what a polygraph was, and now I think I've explained to you what evidence is. I expect a thank you.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot