Music sales skyrocket after singer dons pro-Trump dress to Grammys
-
EdmundOG — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 03:51 PM)
Eh. I may have been misinformed about the sales dip, but the point is, the boycott worked. Chick-fil-A no longer supports anti-gay and anti-family organizations, it's clear they saw that their business interests were better served by not doing so. If they did that while sales were steadily increasing, it only strengthens the point. No business has ever stopped supporting gays because of a conservative boycott.
-
Final_Hitokiri — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 06:22 PM)
Eh. I may have been misinformed about the sales dip, but the point is, the boycott worked. Chick-fil-A no longer supports anti-gay and anti-family organizations
Um Chick Fil A always allowed gays to dine at their restaurants. It was never an issue.
And their sales did increase. So the "boycott" had the exact opposite effect of what a boycott is supposed to do. -
EdmundOG — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:22 AM)
Um Chick Fil A always allowed gays to dine at their restaurants. It was never an issue.
Um I never said it was an issue, nor did anyone who was boycotting them. The issue, as I said in that bit you quoted up there, was their financial support of anti-gay and anti-family organizations.
And their sales did increase. So the "boycott" had the exact opposite effect of what a boycott is supposed to do.
No, it had the exact effect of what a boycott is supposed to do, which is to change policy.
There were two groups involved here.
Group A said "We are unhappy that Chick-fil-A gives money to these organizations, and we will not eat there until they stop."
Group B said "We are happy that Chick-fil-A gives money to these organizations, and therefore we will eat there more often."
Chick-fil-A responded by stopping donations to the organizations in question.
So which group got what they wanted? -
DeepConvection — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 11:55 AM)
You're right, as long as you're an oligarch or ultra-rich corporate beneficiary who would like to exploit the rights and wealth of the mid and lower classes for your own gain.
"All great truths begin as blasphemies."
- George Bernard Shaw
-
Guitar_King — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 11:26 AM)
She's number one on Amazon.com over anti Trumpers like Beyonce, and Katy Perry. This is an approval rating that's not being faked.
Donald Trump for President 2016 -
-
assassinatestevebannon — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 09:25 PM)
Case in point:
http://imgur.com/Siq1BZI
McCain wasn't a soldier. - kinch "dopey" Telemachus -
wordsatplaytoday — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 11:55 AM)
"I stand as a proud American and I stand for
a unified America that is tolerant of each other
no matter who we voted for. I stand behind our President because that's the American thing to do. I believe in love, above all."
I guess she didn't vote for him after all.
Trump lies:
Mexico is going to pay for the wall.
I can stop federal funds. -
SALTER-pt — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 03:59 PM)
I'd say well played to her, only I question the ethics of manipulating people as credulous as Trump supporters.
Still, since they're responsible for this global embarrassment, perhaps they're not worth the sympathy.
I know words. I have the best words - Donald J Trump, POTUS -
DeepConvection — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 04:59 PM)
You're right, no African American woman could possibly be an actual Trump supporter. That would just be impossible. All African American women think the same, and all African American women hate Trump.
Therefore, she obviously has to be trying to exploit people.
It just isn't possible that an African American woman could be intelligent enough to be a Trump supporter. It's just not within the realm of possibility. She's obviously just a "coon" like the media told me to think.
[/sarcasm]
You racists sicken me. People have political preferences you know. They don't have political preferences because they have a certain skin color, they have political preferences because they are free to have their own opinions. It doesn't matter if a woman is of Afican American, Asian, Indian, or European heritage. She has the same right to her own opinions as everyone else. Get used to it. Stop berating her for having her own opinions. Stop acting like she can't possibly have her own politial opinions because her skin color is different than what you're used to."All great truths begin as blasphemies."
- George Bernard Shaw
-
Jill-McBain — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 05:24 PM)
It has never happened before, I guess, that sales went up after the Grammys.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ominous-story-of-syria-climate-refugees/ -
mr_self — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 05:32 PM)
According to Nielsen Music, based on initial sales reports, the album sold 2,000 copies on Sunday in the U.S. up from a negligible figure the day previous.
http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/grammys/7686492/joy-villa-trump-dress-make-america-great-again-sales-bump-grammys
Girl got paid, I guess.
But I checked out a few of her songs and her music is pretty wack. At least her publicity stunt got her 5 minutes of fame, I suppose. Her music definitely wasn't going to do that.
I don't want to belong to any club that will accept people like me as a member -
DeepConvection — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 05:42 PM)
So because mr_self doesn't like an African American woman Trump supporter's music, she must be trying to get paid. She couldn't possibly be smart enough to be a Trump supporter. That would just be impossible.
"All great truths begin as blasphemies."
- George Bernard Shaw