Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Dave Rubin, former progressive: Why I left the Left

Dave Rubin, former progressive: Why I left the Left

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
20 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Carl-LaFong — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:15 AM)

    I asked my question first . aren't you concerned about the blatant lie in the last Wash Times article you posted? You totally ignored it when it was brought to your attention.
    You're my wife now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      TamPalm — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:17 AM)

      I didn't see the lie, but if you say it was a lie it must have been (
      ), so I agree that the article should not have included a lie if it did.
      Back to my question. Do you have a response to the substance of what Rubin states in the above article?
      "If it doesn't make sense, it's not true." Judge Judy
      Keep free speech and free thought alive!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        Carl-LaFong — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:22 AM)

        Jesus wept, Eddie even quoted it for you. Here it is again:
        "Leaking the transcripts of a phone call between
        an American member of government
        and the Russian ambassador is illegal. "
        What position in the govt was held by Flynn at the time?
        And as for Rubin, I broadly agree with what he has to say about many leftists and identity politics.
        You're my wife now.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          TamPalm — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:26 AM)

          What position in the govt was held by Flynn at the time?
          He was a General and perhaps he had already been chosen NSA and already had a clearance and whatnot. Even still, maybe the writer was referring to Trump, whose calls with foreign leaders WHILE HE WAS PRESIDENT, were leaked.
          And as for Rubin, I broadly agree with what he has to say about many leftists and identity politics.
          Good to know you are not all the way gone.
          "If it doesn't make sense, it's not true." Judge Judy
          Keep free speech and free thought alive!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            Carl-LaFong — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:29 AM)

            "He was a General and perhaps he had already been chosen NSA and already had a clearance and whatnot. Even still, maybe the writer was referring to Trump, whose calls with foreign leaders WHILE HE WAS PRESIDENT, were leaked. "
            Obvious to me he meant Flynn, who held no govt position at the time.
            You're my wife now.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              Painbow — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:15 AM)

              He should post links to the much more reliable and trustworthy Daily Mail.
              Forum of choice -
              https://www.imdforums.com

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                Winter_King — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:11 AM)

                I'm subscribed to his channel on YT. Always interesting interviews, even then ones with people I mostly disagree.
                Always the artists.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  Asteri-Atypical — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:17 AM)

                  That position has merit, but I sure as hell hope he hasn't used it to justify supporting the likes of Trump.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    Carl-LaFong — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:32 AM)

                    Amen.
                    You're my wife now.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      Painbow — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:17 AM)

                      Ruben's got it the wrong way round.
                      He is a liberal lefty. It's the SJW brand of the left that is the problem; not the reasonable left.
                      Why let them take ownership of the left?
                      Forum of choice -
                      https://www.imdforums.com

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        Carl-LaFong — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:33 AM)

                        Indeed.
                        You're my wife now.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          Asteri-Atypical — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:39 AM)

                          Why let them take ownership of the left?
                          I don't think they REALLY have; they've been more painted that way by the righty media outlets.
                          I see the SJWs as a fringe of the left, just as the evangelicals are a fringe movement of the current right. However, the only movement which has managed to truly hijack a larger ideology has been Trumpism and its hijacking of the right. Trump has somehow achieved the biggest status on the right and, alas, the majority of the right is now falling in line with him, as opposed to standing up and saying "he doesn't represent MY brand of conservatism!"

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            Painbow — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 08:03 AM)

                            The social justice warrior left is small but it would be disingenuous to say it hasn't become hugely influential.
                            If a right-wing news outlet says women can't be raped because their vaginas shut down, pretty much everyone on the planet (bar sincere mentalists) laughs at the stupidity of such a narrative.
                            Meanwhile, if a left-wing news outlet says that 1 in 4 women are raped (which is nonsense) not only does it get taken seriously but even the president (Obama) repeats the statistic in a media address.
                            That's the difference. It's what I call the
                            right side of history narrative
                            . Technically, you're supporting something good so it doesn't really matter if your talking crap cos you know you're on the right side of history. And those who point out that you're talking crap. Well, they must be hate filled coz why would they disagree with such a positive narrative.
                            And that's why they've become so influential.
                            Forum of choice -
                            https://www.imdforums.com

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              Asteri-Atypical — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 08:24 AM)

                              The social justice warrior left is small but it would be disingenuous to say it hasn't become hugely influential.
                              Agreed. I'm not saying they're not a force to be reckoned with; but they're not synonymous with the left, as there's still a pretty strong dividing line between the factions of the left.
                              If a right-wing news outlet says women can't be raped because their vaginas shut down, pretty much everyone on the planet (bar sincere mentalists) laughs at the stupidity of such a narrative.
                              True. And that's why we have to fear Trumpism (whatever the movement will be called in general). The evangelicals were annoying and have had more influence than they ought, but they weren't growing like the SJW cancer was. Unlike Trumpism, which is now the right's equivalent of SJWs; even more so. It's a huge movement which has found a way to resonate with enough people to gain serious power. SJWs had a role in bringing in Trump, and Trump is pushing more of the left towards SJW-ism. It's a vicious cycle.
                              And those who point out that you're talking crap. Well, they must be hate filled coz why would they disagree with such a positive narrative.
                              There is a problem with that.
                              But then we have given rise to a genuine movement based on hate. Not the rapid racism the SJWs claim, but Trumpism is an angry movement where one votes simply based on what they hate, rather than the strength of ideas.
                              This is why the left needs to reinvent itself. Kick the butts of the SJWs to the point where they can try to get their own party, if they want. And if this were a more ideal world we'd see the rise of one or more Independent moderate parties which were a force to be reckoned with. A party based on issues and rationality instead of the hysteria in either of the mainstream parties.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                moonunit-00839 — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:44 AM)

                                Banning speech is a cornerstone of progressivism, like banning alcohol or mandating healthcare. Progressivism is about eliminating competition because it's "sinful".

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #19

                                  Vic_Hitler — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 08:07 AM)

                                  the most evil of all things: a white, Christian male
                                  In a nutshell, they want to drag the West down in the mud with the rest of the World.
                                  They "hate our freedom" is quite true. They hate our success. They hate our inherent superiority as bermensch among the primitive neanderthals in most of the world, running around still acting like simian simpletons unable to create a culture or a functional societyor indoor plumbing.
                                  The West represents the Elites of the World Order, and naturally the rest of the world hates us for it.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    fgadmin
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    tplast — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 10:20 AM)

                                    Holy Crap. We are nearing the end of the 2010s and he is just now figuring this out about the LEFT? I started to see this back in the 1970s; and I was just a kid.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0

                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups