catfish are like having STDs on your forum
-
I choose violence — 7 years ago(August 04, 2018 07:55 AM)
But if this is seriously about trust, then you're at the wrong place, breh. The majority of posters here are not trustworthy, regardless of catfishing.
This is a soapbox thread for talking **** about people!!! duh!!! IT'S REALLY WEIRD THAT THE PEOPLE I DISLIKE THE MOST HAPPEN TO BE CATFISHY!!!!
Maybe it is better to trust no one, but a catfish posts stolen pictures in order to gain people's trust. People form connections on these forums. Having a face to go with the screen name does make someone seem more trustworthy. A lot of people on IMDb certainly fell for it.
Mr Blue Sky please tell us why
You had to hide away for so long? -
Café — 7 years ago(August 04, 2018 05:44 AM)
Stealing someone's photos and passing them off as your own is a ****ty thing to do, and borders on harassment and stalking. It's akin to identity theft, and could cause harm to the innocent person being targeted.
I'm only going to speak of this once because I'm not getting into a back-and-forth thing. But this is completely ironic coming from you, because doxxing and even attempted failed doxxing in a Tinychat is also harassment and stalking.
You used the word "obviously" fake pics - but there's nothing "obvious" about it being fake. It's speculation on your part. It may be strong speculation and you may sincerely believe it, but it's speculation none-the-less.
With Geewizz, a user actually found videos of the man singing which Geewizz claimed as his own. That can be called substantial evidence. But there's nothing contradicts that being my body. There can't be, because I took it. It's speculation, not evidence.
I've never given out any specific information about me on these very boards. So whatever info you have, it was not given to you by me, and you've arrived at it without my consent, which is harassment and stalking. I do not speak of nor authenticate any info I do not give out personally here. More, even by factoring in any doxxing, there's nothing out there that contradicts that being my torso, and if my current pics were "doxxed," then it'd actually prove it.
You can't claim it's "obviously" a fake pic because it doesn't match up with how you envisioned the poster's torso looking based on posting habits and other factors, when you haven't actually seen other pictures of the poster's
current
naked torso on other social media to compare. It's flawed logic and it's forbiddingly creepy that you act like you "know" me so well when we have never formally met.
i do know I'm never going to post pics here again, even if I cover up a portion of my face, because I know they get saved. [See book about Mechanic.] You're just as guilty as Ben when it comes to saving people's pics here. -
I choose violence — 7 years ago(August 04, 2018 06:42 AM)
Luckily I've never doxxed anyone with
serious information.
See what I did there?
You just figured that out people might save pics you post? I do not save your pics, don't flatter yourself. btw This is coming from the same guy who made a sock account here with TinyCricket's picture on it. Multiple people have accused you of revealing their full names and identities, and I believe them. I've never done that to anyone, nor would I. You've posted several pics over the years that were not your own. You posted some video of your feet here, which led to your Youtube account and the infamous derma roller video… We've all seen you without a shirt on (unfortunately) and you do not have 6 pack abs.
bye bye autist!
Mr Blue Sky please tell us why
You had to hide away for so long? -
geewizzz — 7 years ago(August 04, 2018 07:06 AM)
With Geewizz, a user actually found videos of the man singing which Geewizz claimed as his own. That can be called substantial evidence.
He found the same
song
but not the same video I uploaded of that song.
I never posted videos from that singer's YouTube channel - we don't look alike.
I
did
post this vid on JC's board in early April 2017 before I started posting clear face pics in my profile…but as I recall the only person who seemed puzzled at the time was Merrida.
Being that the vid only had 17 views, I doubt most were paying any attention to me anyway.
Had it been, I would've been called out on it when I first started doing it.
You got yourself banned from that board early on, so you weren't around to do that, but I'm sure you would've.
These also went unnoticed…and most weren't even interested in my singing career -
All these people from TWD board attacking me for it made zero sense to me - they didn't know me and vice versa.
They just freak out at someone being called a catfish.
Are you okay? -
Ajgoodfellow — 7 years ago(August 04, 2018 10:32 AM)
Luke James Shaffer is married and openly Christian
But now Trollwizzz says they don’t look alike. Um avatar photo guy and LJS actually do look alike. Proof pic guy does not. Clearly Trollwizzz is the proof pic guy who is neither the avatar guy nor the singer.
This entire thing is exhausting and annoying.
Hey Diddler, Diddler….the cat and the fiddler LOL -
geewizzz — 7 years ago(August 04, 2018 10:44 AM)
proof pic guy is the result of image manipulation and wasn't a
proof pic
but a spoof pic in context to Ben's low light cam image.
And guy in my profile pic, does not look like LJS 'cause they are
not
one in the same.
No one would buy the idea that me and him are the same person, which is the reason I never pretended to be LJS and never had a reason to pretend I was him.
Are you okay? -
Ajgoodfellow — 7 years ago(August 04, 2018 10:54 AM)
I never pretended to be LJS and never had a reason to pretend I was him.
I also love how the “proof pic” is no longer a proof pic but a spoof pic.
Dude your whole situation is a spoof.
Hey Diddler, Diddler….the cat and the fiddler LOL -
-
Ajgoodfellow — 7 years ago(August 04, 2018 11:03 AM)
It's hilarious that you refer to avatar pic guy and proof pic guy in the third person.
Almost like…oh I don't…neither one is you
I'm going to bed. Sleep tight! All three of you!
Hey Diddler, Diddler….the cat and the fiddler LOL