The Debate
-
Soul_Venom — 6 days ago(March 27, 2026 12:11 AM)
You think the AI will respond exactly the same each and every time? AI's don't work like that. When I was still learning how to use them I once tried to get the AI to solve a set of equations. Afer getting 30 different answers to the same question I learned how to properly break things down.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
Soul_Venom — 5 days ago(March 27, 2026 01:50 PM)
Madotsuki_the_Dreamer said...
No. Doesn't work that way.
Yes, it does indeed work that way. If it's the exact same AI, then it will answer exactly the same when asked the exact same question.
I can see now what you are doing. You are trying to put off entering the arguments into the AI yourself by nitpicking small details we won't agree on.
Enough stalling.
All our arguments are listed above. Copy/paste them into whatever AI you chose. I believe you had mentioned a 2nd option besides xortron. Do it and face the result.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
/.ㅤ — 5 days ago(March 28, 2026 12:41 AM)
Soul_Venom said...
I can see now what you are doing. You are trying to put off entering the arguments into the AI yourself by nitpicking small details we won't agree on.
Enough stalling.
All our arguments are listed above. Copy/paste them into whatever AI you chose. I believe you had mentioned a 2nd option besides xortron. Do it and face the result.
Honestly, what are you expecting if people paste your whole post into AI? You don't even need AI to know what you posted is blatantly false. Just the claim alone that "the resurrection of Jesus is historical proven fact" shows you how inaccurate the text you provided was and any AI that isn't prompted to do otherwise will flag that as untrue.
My password is password. -
Soul_Venom — 5 days ago(March 28, 2026 02:21 AM)
/.ㅤ said...
Honestly, what are you expecting if people paste your whole post into AI? You don't even need AI to know what you posted is blatantly false. Just the claim alone that "the resurrection of Jesus is historical proven fact" shows you how inaccurate the text you provided was and any AI that isn't prompted to do otherwise will flag that as untrue.
any AI that isn't prompted to do otherwise will flag that as untrue.
I provided the FULL text of the debate. My parts, Dreamers parts and the AI's response. I challenge you not only to comb that full text for such a prompt but to also copy the full text into any other AI to check the result.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
/.ㅤ — 6 days ago(March 27, 2026 06:07 AM)
It can. It depends on the so-called temperature setting. A higher temperature introduces more randomness. A temperature setting of zero theoretically means it will respond the same way every time.
My password is password. -
-
Soul_Venom — 1 week ago(March 26, 2026 05:14 AM)
Anyone who claims "zero evidence" is just plain ignorant. Not only is there plenty of evidence but much of it is the same evidence the evolutionists use we just interpret it differently.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
/.ㅤ — 1 week ago(March 26, 2026 05:27 AM)
There's no evidence. If there was then no one would doubt the existence of god. All that we do have is mountains of evidence that refute the bible so if there is a god it's not the christian god, or the christian god is very strange/retarded and decided to fill his book with a bunch of easily disproven fairy tales and contradictions.
My password is password. -
Soul_Venom — 1 week ago(March 26, 2026 05:38 AM)
There's no evidence.
See? There you going making yourself sould like an absolute dumbfuck yet again. Seems to be your sole talent.
The fossil record is evidence. Our DNA is evidence. The yucatan crater is evidence. Or do you deny that those things exist?
I think your issue is that you have mixed up evidence v proof. And I would agree that there is no proof. God only wanted people who came to Him by faith so while He left plenty of evidence He eliminated all proof.
a bunch of easily disproven
Apparently not so easy. You are free to run the AI test yourself.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
/.ㅤ — 1 week ago(March 26, 2026 05:45 AM)
The fossil record is evidence. Our DNA is evidence. The yucatan crater is evidence. Or do you deny that those things exist?
You mean the fossil record that shows billions of years of life and evolution in action? You mean DNA which shows how closely related we are to apes? You mean the Yucatan crater that is 65 million years old, far older than the 6000 years old the bible claims the Earth is? Every single one of those things refutes the bible.
My password is password. -
Soul_Venom — 1 week ago(March 26, 2026 05:54 AM)
You mean the fossil record that shows rapid burial during the Great Flood? You mean the DNA that shows how mathematically unlikely evolution is? You mean the Yucatan crater that supports hydroplate flood theory?
Guess what /.
The same pieces of evidence can be interpreted differently.
Remember that next time you are tempted to say something stupid like 'no evidence'
There is lots of evidence and most of it is the same as evolutionist evidence. We just interpret it differently.
All the things you claim to refute the Bible can be turned around to support it.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
/.ㅤ — 1 week ago(March 26, 2026 06:32 AM)
You say "we interpret it differently." Don't include me in that. I'm not so arrogant that I believe I'm qualified to interpret the science involved on these subjects. You're the only one doing that here. Instead, I'm going by the interpretation of every single scientist on the planet. There isn't a single scientist that would argue any of the nonsense you just attempted.
I'll help you out though. Even though I'm no a scientist we can actually answer some of these questions using only common sense.
You mean the fossil record that shows rapid burial during the Great Flood?
Common sense number one: you can't fit two of every animal or "kind" on a boat. Right there your bullshit meter should be off the charts. It should have been going off when you were five years old.
You mean the DNA that shows how mathematically unlikely evolution is?
This argument fails for the same reason your general "there's evidence of god" argument failed. If evolution was truly mathematically unlikely then it wouldn't be accepted as fact by essentially every single scientist.
The truth is we don't even need to look at the math to verify whether evolution exists. We just have to look at reality. What we actually see in nature is that mutations can occur very rapidly. Look how quickly viruses evolve. Or look at the animals in Chernobyl that have developed resistance to radiation, and that's only over a couple decades.
You mean the Yucatan crater that supports hydroplate flood theory?
I don't even know what the hell hydroplate theory is and I'm not even going to bother wasting any brain cells looking it up, but if the Yucatan crater was caused by an asteroid impact within the last 6000 years, there would be much more substantial evidence for it. It wouldn't be eroded to the point where it's barely even visible by satellite.
My password is password. -
Soul_Venom — 1 week ago(March 26, 2026 05:57 AM)
Once again. If you are so confident take the AI challenge. I think that is why dreamer went quiet. He is trying to feed in the same data and get a different result. He wont.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins!