The Debate
-
/.ㅤ — 1 week ago(March 26, 2026 06:32 AM)
You say "we interpret it differently." Don't include me in that. I'm not so arrogant that I believe I'm qualified to interpret the science involved on these subjects. You're the only one doing that here. Instead, I'm going by the interpretation of every single scientist on the planet. There isn't a single scientist that would argue any of the nonsense you just attempted.
I'll help you out though. Even though I'm no a scientist we can actually answer some of these questions using only common sense.
You mean the fossil record that shows rapid burial during the Great Flood?
Common sense number one: you can't fit two of every animal or "kind" on a boat. Right there your bullshit meter should be off the charts. It should have been going off when you were five years old.
You mean the DNA that shows how mathematically unlikely evolution is?
This argument fails for the same reason your general "there's evidence of god" argument failed. If evolution was truly mathematically unlikely then it wouldn't be accepted as fact by essentially every single scientist.
The truth is we don't even need to look at the math to verify whether evolution exists. We just have to look at reality. What we actually see in nature is that mutations can occur very rapidly. Look how quickly viruses evolve. Or look at the animals in Chernobyl that have developed resistance to radiation, and that's only over a couple decades.
You mean the Yucatan crater that supports hydroplate flood theory?
I don't even know what the hell hydroplate theory is and I'm not even going to bother wasting any brain cells looking it up, but if the Yucatan crater was caused by an asteroid impact within the last 6000 years, there would be much more substantial evidence for it. It wouldn't be eroded to the point where it's barely even visible by satellite.
My password is password. -
Soul_Venom — 1 week ago(March 26, 2026 05:57 AM)
Once again. If you are so confident take the AI challenge. I think that is why dreamer went quiet. He is trying to feed in the same data and get a different result. He wont.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
Christian 4 Real — 1 week ago(March 26, 2026 05:39 AM)
There is no evidence.
Of course you can't delineate proof of the existence of God. He did not design and create the universe to that end. He does not want followers who are robots.
Your feeble finite mind comes to your finite conclusion, not realizing that the mind of God is infinitely beyond your ability to conceive.
He calls for us to come to Him and woos some of us to Himself. He gives those enough understanding to follow Him as we submit to His Holy Spirit within us. -
Soul_Venom — 6 days ago(March 26, 2026 03:57 PM)
There you go again.
No PROOF
Mountains of evidence.
See the difference? Of course not. You are stupid and will repeat the same lie in your next reply. I'm done with you.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
Uncreative — 6 days ago(March 26, 2026 04:24 PM)
There's no evidence. If there was then no one would doubt the existence of god.
There's overwhelming evidence for all sorts of **** that retards like him still deny. If there was proof of god tons of people would still deny it. But there isn't and he's still an idiot so it doesn't matter. -
Soul_Venom — 6 days ago(March 26, 2026 05:01 PM)
Yes, yes you are all TikTok generation, 5 second attention span and ****. I dont ****ing care. This thread is for people with IQ's above potato anyway. Go lick a window or something.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins!
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 
