Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Bruce Almighty

Bruce Almighty

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
8 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Religion, Faith, and Spirituality


    washclothrepairman — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 05:33 AM)

    Jim Carrey's character is correct, god is incompetent.
    Results like these do not belong on the resume of a supreme being.
    Never trust a black man named "Chip."

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Oglaigh_na_hEireann1981 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 05:50 AM)

      God is all-good he cant be incompetent.
      formerly known as Saoradh

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        washclothrepairman — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 05:54 AM)

        He is not "all-good." And those things are not incompatible anyway.
        An "all-good" being doesn't kill every living person (save one family) for their sinfulness that he created. An all-good being doesn't send
        anyone
        to eternal torture. An all-good being does not look on in indifference to all the suffering and injustice in the world.
        Never trust a black man named "Chip."

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Oglaigh_na_hEireann1981 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 06:06 AM)

          And those things are not incompatible anyway.
          Ok then, all-perfect.
          An "all-good" being doesn't kill every living person (save one family) for their sinfulness that he created. An all-good being doesn't send anyone to eternal torture. An all-good being does not look on in indifference to all the suffering and injustice in the world.
          If an all-good being dd it then those actions are good.
          formerly known as Saoradh

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            smithjgs — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 06:07 AM)

            Looking to Jim Carrey for ideological clarity?
            No wonder your views are so [kinda] funny!
            If this is Locke, then who's in there?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              The-Last-Prydonian — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 08:44 PM)

              Looking to Jim Carrey for ideological clarity?
              Looking to a imaginary deity for clarity on the meaning of life and giving purpose to your existence without any solid evidecnce?
              No wonder your views are so [kinda] funny.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Oglaigh_na_hEireann1981 — 9 years ago(December 31, 2016 07:08 AM)

                edgy
                formerly known as Saoradh

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  YouMightRabbitYouMight — 9 years ago(December 31, 2016 07:53 AM)

                  I believe you're a tad "edgier".
                  How about a months later one from you?
                  But the only situation in which sex with children is moral and should be allowed is when the child is capable of Informed consent. Now obviously a 7 year old can't do that but a 12 year old at the very least could.
                  It's one of your many posts before you realized all save your core group of pedos found your kidf!cker wants to be reprehensible.
                  Reply 10: Re: Is Sex with Children a bad thing?
                  carmb09 replied 11 months, 3 weeks ago
                  Definitely, I would estimate around 5 or 6 is the maximum age where they wouldn't be able to, but I really don't know.
                  Many children after they consent to sex with an adult are brainwashed into thinking they were raped and abused but that's just not true.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0

                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups