Yet more political correctness gone mad
-
Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler — 9 years ago(December 28, 2016 10:16 AM)
Yeah, it's on Twitter too. Remember the furore when trump retweeted some dubious crime stats from a user call whitegenocide?
"Whether homosexuality causes less harm (than slavery) is debatable" -
Hada -
moonunit-00839 — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 11:13 PM)
It is on Stormfront, Breitbart comment sections, more than a couple alt-righty reddit forums, areas of 4chan, etc. That's the crowd he's spoofing.
What? Don't look at me, I just hang out there to see what they're jawing about.
Professor Noel Ignatiev called for the "abolition of the white race". England's diversity minister tweeted "Kill all white males". You're familiar enough with the alt right to know about "white genocide" but know familiar enough to know where it came from? -
Cinemachinery — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 11:18 PM)
Professor Noel Ignatiev
This is like watching an alt-right virgin stumble on his first Stormfront thread on nationalism. You're so new and fresh. Welcome to 1999.
"I can use stage combat in a real life fight, right?" - Blade -
Sir_Digby_Chicken_Ceasar — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 05:37 AM)
One of my other opinions is that SJWs are super-attuned to irony and context, and never pounce on any opportunity to fabricate outrage at dubious examples of some -ism. If someone else "ironically" called for the genocide of some other group, SJWs would definitely jump to their defence. The only possible harm from these type of comments stigmatising white people is definitely only if they're literal.
-
senseibushido — 9 years ago(December 26, 2016 08:38 PM)
I don't understand how they can sign a petition that rails against racist trolling in defense of this guy when he was literally racist trolling himself. And aren't these college SJW types the ones who repeat the "freedom of speech isn't freedom from consequences" refrain whenever
they're
the ones trying to get someone fired for saying something they disagree with? -
Hanz-Willhelm2 — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 03:25 PM)
The ones that annoy me the most are giving up long held traditions and celebrations because someone might not agree with said tradition and get offended therefor we should just give up our culture and tradition because of the "offended". I recently read a story about a town in Italy that was not going to display the nativity scene around Christmas because a non-Christmas celebrater may be offended. Idiots that decide things like this should be beaten.
Lamar Jackson for Heisman! -
YouMightRabbitYouMight — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 07:07 PM)
Just make room for the Ramadan display.
And an Auditors Day display, a Throw the Jew Down the Well well, etc.
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com:443/data.filmboards/images/upload/AFDi0vg.png -
micCee — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 08:52 PM)
But those people wouldn't necessarily be standing up for freedom of speech under other circumstances.
I'm not in favour of political correctness, no matter which group is intended to 'benefit' from it. In my opinion, political correctness appoints one group as the benevolent guardians and protectors of the other. If the goal is for everyone to feel like equals; the worst thing that you can do is to elevate heterosexual whites to the role of guardians protecting the poor vulnerable sexual and racial minorities against mere words (and if you are a white heterosexual male, you're quite rightly supposed to stop being emotionally wounded by words at round about the age of 8).
It could be a balloon. It could be Franky. It could be very fresh and clean. It could be those ways.