Frank Lampard v Steven Gerrard: who was better?
-
Mr-Brightside — 9 years ago(February 02, 2017 04:14 PM)
Nah, he was rubbish. A one paced, play-by-numbers footballer who was fortunate too be playing his trade at a club who were about to embark on an almost unparalleled run of success. Very much made to look a better player than he was, by the team and the coaching staff he was fortunate enough to be around.
I probably [read:definitely] exaggerated by branding him shít, as he did have moments (emphasis on moments as they were incredibly fleeting) but great he most certainly wasn't. Too wildly inconsistent, too few stand out skills, too often injured and far too concerned with the trappings of football life, rather than the actuality of football life. A one paced, basic football player who's career panned out in the manner it was always going to.
We don't tolerate sexual harassment in the workplace
we grade it. -
stan-18673 — 9 years ago(February 02, 2017 12:41 PM)
Neville and Carragher discuss Scholes, Lampard and Gerrard.
Carragher predictably chose Gerrard, Neville predictably chose Scholes (well he said Scholes is the best player he ever played with)
I do think we wasted Scholes' talent somewhat though, he was the closest thing we had to a Pirlo or Iniesta or Xavi.
So mismanaged by Sven or was he just not as good as Lampard and Gerrard? I'd go for the former. -
NightShadeAlleluia — 9 years ago(February 02, 2017 12:51 PM)
Bergkamp.
What's up white people.
http://docthewho.wordpress.com/- check my blog
-