Now that Carr is injured
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Sports
ctown28 — 9 years ago(December 25, 2016 06:09 PM)
and the Raiders likely won't go far in the playoffs without him, the question is who will AH_Fan pick as the AFC representative for the SuperBowl? So far he has picked the Broncos, when he was wrong about that and they will likely miss the playoffs, he switched to the Raiders. My guess is he will likely choose the Steelers.
-
JohnLockeShallRiseAgain — 9 years ago(December 25, 2016 06:24 PM)
This season has Eli vs Brady round 3 written all over it. No AFC team is beating the Patriots, as much as I hate to admit it. The Raiders weren't going to either even with Carr, certainly if they had to go to NE. If they played at home then maybe, but I'd still put my money on NE. But that's all moot now.
So now my hope is Eli can beat Brady yet again. Or we get a Rodgers-Brady SB, but with the Packers defense I wouldn't hold my breath for them to win.
Or the Cowboys, with that fantastic recent track record of playoff success and led by two rookies (aka not happening).
BARTYOUWANNASEEMYNEWCHAINSAWANDHOCKEYMASK?!?! -
AH_Fan — 9 years ago(December 25, 2016 06:30 PM)
This season has Eli vs Brady round 3 written all over it.
It'll be the Cowboys this season. Villanova ended a 31-year drought. The Cavs ended a 52-year drought for the city of Cleveland. The Cubs ended a 108-year drought. Now the Cowboys are going to end a 21-year drought and win their 6th Super Bowl.
Cowboys, with that fantastic recent track record of playoff success and led by two rookies (aka not happening).
Well, no one thought a rookie politician could win the Presidency against Hillary but Trump shocked the world and did it. And now the Cowboys, with a rookie QB and rookie RB, are going to shock the world and win the Super Bowl this season. -
HeHatesShe — 9 years ago(December 25, 2016 06:34 PM)
"Well, no one thought a rookie politician could win the Presidency against Hillary but Trump shocked the world and did it"
The champion of the AFC will be a far less flawed opponent than Hillary was.
But probably no less crooked! AMIRITE!? -
JohnLockeShallRiseAgain — 9 years ago(December 25, 2016 06:34 PM)
If the Cowboys win then fine, anyone but NE, but I just have a hard time believing a team headed by two rookies can win it all. And Trump winning has nothing to do with it, since an elected official is done by will of the people; if we did that in the NFL, the Steelers and Packers would just trade off championships every year, judging by fanbase.
BARTYOUWANNASEEMYNEWCHAINSAWANDHOCKEYMASK?!?! -
AnotherCleverName — 9 years ago(December 25, 2016 06:38 PM)
t'll be the Cowboys this season. Villanova ended a 31-year drought. The Cavs ended a 52-year drought for the city of Cleveland. The Cubs ended a 108-year drought. Now the Cowboys are going to end a 21-year drought and win their 6th Super Bowl
Stupid logic since the Chiefs have a much longer drought, so I guess they're more likely to win.
~I know that I know nothing.~ -
flyerzzrul — 9 years ago(December 25, 2016 08:15 PM)
Villanova ended a 31-year drought. The Cavs ended a 52-year drought for the city of Cleveland. The Cubs ended a 108-year drought.
That means either the Chiefs, Dolphins, Lions or Falcons will win. That's ok because I like new blood but I'm rooting Steelers when the Eagles aren't in it or the Pats just so Roger has to hand Brady the trophy. Anybody but the Giants or Cowgirls, though if Romo were qb I'd be ok because I like him and I think he gets a bad rap