Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Stottlemyre may not make it out of 2016

Stottlemyre may not make it out of 2016

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
9 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Sports


    NJtoTX — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 07:48 AM)

    http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/yankees/ex-yankees-pitcher-coach-mel-stottlemyre-fighting-life-article-1.2922466
    http://timeisaflatcircus.tumblr.com/

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      TheGoodMan19 — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 08:19 AM)

      One of my favorite Yankees. Active from 1964-1974, he's the poster boy for "right place, wrong time". If Mel had been active from 1954-1964, I think he would have been in the HOF. Or 1944-1954, 1994-2004 and nearly any other stretch. Mel W/L percentage would have been stellar if he had had more than Horace Clarke, Jake Gibbs and Jerry Kenney scoring (or trying) to score runs.
      Your future's all used up.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        charli3 — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 10:17 AM)

        I thought he was older than 75.
        In 1954 he was 13 so how could he be pitching in the majors?
        Thx!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          TheGoodMan19 — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 10:28 AM)

          In 1954 he was 13 so how could he be pitching in the majors?
          I said "IF" Stottlemyre was with the Yanks in 1954 to 1964, he would have been in the HOF. His numbers, especially wins and winning pct., would be much better if he had played at a time when the Yankees won 8 out of 10 AL Pennants instead of one out of ten.
          Your future's all used up.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            HairyButtCheeks — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 10:32 AM)

            ^^this^^
            he was a bright spot in a dark period. he did pith in one world series i believe . . against the cards. the yankees sucked in the late 60's ..then munson and FA came along.
            these says, pitcher like that on a team like that would have been traded.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              TheGoodMan19 — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 10:44 AM)

              Mel pitched three games in the 1964 Series, winning game 2, ND in Game 5 and got beat by Bob Gibson in Game 7. Then nothing. Yankees had good pitching in the Stottlemyre years, Stan Bahnsen, Al Downing, Fritz Peterson. And some good position players, Bobby Murcer, Roy White, Joe Pepitone. But not enough. And the AL finally caught up with the Yanks. They couldn't compete with the Orioles and teams like the Red Sox, Twins, White Sox (in the 60's) and Tigers quit being cannon fodder for the Bombers.
              Your future's all used up.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                HairyButtCheeks — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 10:48 AM)

                Exactly, the introduction of the draft killed them. It wasn't until FA that they really recovered and became a juggernaut again. Even the dodgers declined, they were scored fewer runs in the whole series against the O's than the O's scored in the FIRST INNING OF THE FIRST GAME. Pretty amazing.
                The O's teams of the late 60's were great.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  TheGoodMan19 — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 11:23 AM)

                  It wasn't all due to the Draft. Yankees were owned by CBS, who didn't give a Tinker's damn about the team. They lost their major league farm team, the Kansas City A's. And the AL did finally catch up to NY. The league had been the Yankees, one or two competitors and a bunch of dreck. Even the bottom feeders in the 60's, A's, new Senators, Angels were infinitely more competitive than the St. Louis Browns, Philly A's, old Nationals/Senators.
                  Your future's all used up.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    HairyButtCheeks — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 11:26 AM)

                    Yeah CBS ruined the team. attendance really tanked in the late 60's especially when the mets got good. That reversed by 1976 though.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0

                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups