US becoming a police state.
-
Kreegor — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 08:37 AM)
Keep in mind England has already arrested two people for just that calling someone a fgt via Twitter. To think that nanny states cannot happen to us is wrong.
Also EVERYONE has something to hide, something they want to keep private.
www.400monkeys.com/God/ -
washclothrepairman — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 09:17 AM)
England's justice system is even more fcked up than ours. I read about a case where two teenager murderers that killed three people in cold blood got like 5 years in prison while the adult that hurt no one and helped them cover it up got 30 years.
Limeys are fcking stupid.
Never trust a black man named "Chip." -
Kreegor — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 11:56 AM)
The only thing I'd be worried about them finding would be the music and the odd game I've pirated. I download TV shows too, but I don't see this as stealing since I pay for HBO and Netflix but I hate MS Silverlight so I download them instead. Music's the biggy here, I haven't bought music in well over a decade.
But Canada seems to be a lot more lax on piracy than the US. The US probably cares more about piracy and protecting corporate interests than stopping child pornography. I would not be surprised if the money spent combating piracy was at least twice that of combating pedos.
I'm sure it's only a matter of time before they start handing out fines to people who've downloaded copyrighted materials, or watched a copyrighted vid, etc.
www.400monkeys.com/God/ -
!!!deleted!!! (62963595) — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 12:10 PM)
It seems like it takes more resources than its worth to charge random people who download stuff. You do see the odd "public execution" every now and then, where they charge some guy 10 trillion dollhairs and sentence him to 5 millennia in exile on a barren planet, but I feel like the harsh punishment is indicative of the lack of effectiveness in enforcement in a lot of these kinds of cases.
Maybe if they develop Skynet and it can just run searches through everyone's sh!t, automatically dispensing insta-tickets every time it catches something illegal, but with the current system I don't think you have much to worry about. Just don't be that one guy lol. -
Kreegor — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 12:17 PM)
I'm sure it will get to the point when they see your IP has downloaded something copyrighted, they'll fine you automatically. Kind of like how they send a ticket to your house if you get caught in red light / speeding cameras.
And I know they can tell because I was talking to my cousin in the US and told him to get Westworld, he downloaded the first episode and got an e-mail from his ISP telling him not to do it again.
I cannot see it being a prison sentence, but an auto-fine is something they can easily do. At that point a VPN would be nice.. but then there is a problem with that because see topic.
www.400monkeys.com/God/ -
Kreegor — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 12:37 PM)
Screw that, Copyright has been perverted by the corporations anyway. You know copyright used to only be 7 years? Now it's the life of the creator + 75 years or some such nonsense.
I ain't going back to paying for music.
www.400monkeys.com/God/ -
Kreegor — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 02:45 AM)
Step aside gulags, military crackdowns, and execution by AA guns, teh fckin USA givin you a run for your money by searching your property with a warrant.
that needs no proof or any evidence of a crime. Simply a person concealing their computer through electronic means.
They need a judge to sign off on this warrant, and some judges won't. But since this would be a federal law, they can district shop to find a judge who will sign off on it, even if that judge is no where near the area in which the computer they want info on is located.
www.400monkeys.com/God/ -
SignoftheTimes — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 09:17 AM)
They'll ignore it until Obama's out of office and Trump is in office.
Just like the conservatives did with the deficit until GW Bush left office
They just passed the grief the next president like that trillion dollar+ war didn't happen. -
Vivi87 — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 09:20 AM)
Yeah, I agree. Everyone blamed Obama for the trillion dollar deficit in 2009 but Bush approved it. He's responsible for the deficit being $1 trillion and leaving Obama with a whole bunch of problems when Obama entered office yet day one people blamed Obama for those problems.
I blame both though for increasing the national debt. For all the good Obama did, he the national debt increased trillions under him as it did Bush.
Hell, even the bank bailouts Bush started and Obama continued but it seems people only blame Bush for that.
"Brings back memories for me too. That was the first song I was beaten up to." -
SignoftheTimes — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 09:54 AM)
I'm probably one of the few that saw the bailouts as a good thing.
Imagine if all those banks and the auto industry failed like they were about to in 07-08.
The job losses would have been comparable to a depression. That was probably the smartest thing Geroge Bush did while in office since at least it set up the econemy for a quick recovery. -
!!!deleted!!! (62963595) — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 10:01 AM)
There's probably a reason for that, lol.
Here's the problem with bailouts and the stimulus spending that continued after it (but wasn't really paid attention to by the gen public because it wasn't neatly wrapped in a big package that said "GOVERNMENT BAILOUT MONEY" like the 800 billion or whatever it was package): they create what appears to be, like you said, a "quick", stable recovery, but it's just another bubble. Some economists estimate that the stock market is overvalued by up to 80%. That's p. fcking ridiculous dude.
So sure, in the interim it looks like a catastrophic collapse was avoided and we're actually doing p. well (think the S&P hit a new record the other day), but we're just setting ourselves up for another big crash, once this bubble breaks. Nobody is sure what the cause will be this time, but most people recognize the signs of an overvalued bull market these days, and know a recession is coming.
Now your doomsday depression scenario would have sucked hard AF in the short term, maybe some of us would be fckin ded, but that kind of a reset would actually bring the economy back down to a level that's manageable based on the real, intrinsic value of the market. The recovery would be slower and sh!ttier, but it would be RAEL. The current Keynesian system just jumps from bubble to bubble, recession to recession, making everyone feel good during the bull markets but then they get hammered down time and time again during the recessions. Why don't we just have one really, really big, sh!tty recession, and then build an economy back that has substance? The current strategies are just like the guy who borrows to pay off other credit. The sh!t doesn't work in the long term. We need short term pain for long term gain. -
SignoftheTimes — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 10:47 AM)
The reason this bubble will pop will be because Trump will likely switch to trickle down economics(i.e. cutting taxes for the 1% and pray that they use it to create jobs) which sinks the economy time and time again.
And I don't think those companies failing would have helped because something just as big coming up to take its place is hardly guaranteed. We've seen that manufacturing has all but left the US, so if the auto industry failed, whose to say that Americans wouldn't have just switched buying foreign cars instead. -
!!!deleted!!! (62963595) — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 10:55 AM)
The reason this bubble will pop will be because Trump will likely switch to trickle down economics(i.e. cutting taxes for the 1% and pray that they use it to create jobs) which sinks the economy time and time again.
Lmao dude this economy was doomed to fail a long time ago. This stupidity here is actually one of the reasons I kind of wish Clinton had won, because there's gonna be a recession no matter who got in, but whoever is sitting in the whitehouse is going to have to shoulder the blame for something that's inevitable. Economists and even Trump himself have been calling this for a long time now, Trump's policies will have little overall influence.
And I don't think those companies failing would have helped because something just as big coming up to take its place is hardly guaranteed.
That's the whole point. If the biggest industries are propped up on stimulus, then they shouldn't be there anymore. Well, they're not going to be there anymore, one day. The whole idea of short term pain, long term gain is to suffer heavy losses in the interim so that when the recovery happens, whatever is built is actually sustainable. This could be smaller but it would still be better. Think like the difference between taking a loan out that you'll never be able to repay in order to buy a Ferrari vs paying cash for a Honda Civic. Of course everyone would prefer a Ferrari, but it's more responsible to opt for something sustainable, even if it's worse.