Info on the Deleted prologue
-
infexshun-1 — 20 years ago(September 16, 2005 03:26 AM)
Hmm, based on your description, it sounds terrible (prologue). But it would be nice to see the movie as it was intended. Also, never judge a book by its description??
maybe king will release a DVD with this original opening somewhere on it.
Good times will be had by all. -
robocopperus — 20 years ago(October 29, 2005 12:15 PM)
Thanks for the information TelevisionJunkie. Though, this still doesn't make sense to me -
The little girl that appears in the shop window is a dead girl wanting to be avengedbut they had the same actress (Drew Barrymore) play a little girl who the cat saves in the final act - so did she die or does she live?
When they first filmed the prologue, did they use a different actress for the window scene? And then when they cut the prologue (the plot of the girl dying), they decided to use the same little girl in both parts of the movie in order to make it more cohesive??
If anybody has any info regarding this it would be appreciated - -
karcreat2 — 16 years ago(January 16, 2010 07:05 PM)
Sorry, but this 'deleted sequence' sounds stupid and not important.
it actually makes the story more ridiculous than anything else.
The way the film stands now, I always got the impression that the girl (Drew) was calling out to the cat to come save her from the troll that she knows will try to 'get her' in the final 'The General' storyshe is somehow, inexplicably (yet cooly!) linked to the kittythus, the final scene, where she whispers 'Hi!' to the cat and he licks her facethey are final united, as if it was meant to be;)
K
"I'll be whatever I wanna do!"
-Phillip J. Fry, Futurama
http://www.karcreat.com -
-
Shame that it was removed from the final cut 