Soooo….about that rape?
-
Jonny_B_Lately — 10 years ago(January 24, 2016 03:42 PM)
The character Dunaway plays, does not like to be close to people. In her way, she did initiate the sex. Turner is observant enough to be able to read her. Also, by this point in the film, the principals have reached a level of trust . Turner would not have raped her.
Finally, this is entirely gratuitous. In reality, with a man fearing for his life, sex likely would never have come up. At this time in filmdom, two attractive actors were expected to "get it on" for box office sales. It is, after all, a movie. -
RumourdProd — 9 years ago(April 08, 2016 07:58 PM)
The love scene blows. It's from her point of view, while the whole of the film is from his point of view. Why? Because Redford, a competitive macho movie star, refused to appear vulnerable.
This is one of my favorite films. But that scene as shot is beep You barely see his face except in profile. I know, I know - it's about her opening up to him, buffered by intercut ting her lonely photography. Yet, it's an erroneous move by the filmmakers. -
SealedCargo — 6 years ago(August 08, 2019 04:21 AM)
c'mon, he's a sympathetic great looking man
she dug him
The Fearmakers Blog
https://thefearmakers.blogspot.com/ -
MortSahlFan — 6 months ago(September 17, 2025 06:29 PM)
there was no rape, idiot who will never read this
https://www.patreon.com/LoyalOpposition -
Steve Lake — 6 months ago(September 17, 2025 11:08 PM)
Whats there to think about? Reford is a method actor. Or was one(rip) So he consented to actual penetration for the scene you are referencing.
The only poster who had his account banned 4 times without ever breaking any rules each of those times.