I watched about 80 percent of this long documentary series on YouTube before it was taken down. It was very interesting
-
Zoomorph — 10 years ago(November 08, 2015 11:59 PM)
The maker of this documentary put in effort and you will do so too, if you want to prove your assertions (and can). Otherwise, you should really just shut up and do something that IS worth putting effort into, if such a thing exists in your world.
~ Observe, and act with clarity. ~ -
ggregd — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 09:20 AM)
It's not ad hominem, it's what you people do in my experience. I think your ideas and misinformation are foolish and dangerous. If that hurts your feelings, then cry more, special snowflake.
Your MO is to cherry pick certain small details and get into endless debates about trivialities that go nowhere. It's a waste of time.
This waste of hard drive space "documentary" only repeats the exact propaganda Hitler and the Nazis disseminated throughout their rule to justify their actions to their people, and it ignores anything that doesn't fit the picture they want you to see. What more does an objective person need to know to dismiss this drivel? -
WestGreat — 9 years ago(October 31, 2016 05:42 PM)
"""I know I'm probably wasting my time here arguing with you because you people dismiss anything that doesn't support your "revisionist" dogma as lies, propaganda or a Jewish plot. Hopefully other people without your bias or indoctrination won't blindly accept this piece of crap as the unvarnished truth. """
Yet it's ok to blindly accept EVERYTHING the 'allies' have told us for 70 years, right? It's ok to imprison people and destroy their lives all because they question the historical accuracy of WWII, right? -
ggregd — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 09:10 AM)
Sure, buddy. Because it's either one extreme or the other. The Allies weren't spotless and I believe in freedom of speech. We don't lock people up where I come from, no matter how offensive and idiotic their ideas are.
I accept the current consensus of literally all professional peer reviewed, reputable, objective historians. Which ones have you read? (Don't give me David beep Irving.) I reject pseudo-history coming from people with an agenda. I reject random yahoos on the Internet because anyone can post anything they want. I reject the repeated use of assertions that have been soundly debunked. -
noober-46518 — 10 years ago(October 04, 2015 11:10 PM)
"But it's way too one-sided and biased and tries to portray Hitler as a saint who never did anything wrong. Yeah right. It also ignores a lot of important facts and distorts events too. That means it's definitely NOT an objective or unbiased search for the truth."
Well we could definitely say the truth we have been taught has been bias as well and possibly a lie. Of course the enemy of a state in a war is always the "bad guy". And the loser of the war is always the evil country. Your right though this documentary went a little too far on the Hitler loving. However it's refreshing to get a different perspective on WW2. Really makes ya think. -
canalchivas — 10 years ago(February 02, 2016 04:39 PM)
https://media.giphy.com/media/5hHOBKJ8lw9OM/giphy.gif
Max: I've no interest in making the same mistakes Eleanor did. No interest in fencing their plunder! -
fairy_depp — 9 years ago(April 24, 2016 11:27 AM)
I completely agree.. I don't think anyone with a brain buys that Hitler was an evil tyrant who ate babies for breakfast but I also don't believe that he had entirely honest intentions or that the holocaust is entirely a product of soviet lies. I think the beginning of this documentary is very informative and Hitler certainly did good things for his people (so long as they were white Christian heterosexuals) but towards the end it became ridiculous and obvious the film maker had their own agenda - I just don't believe that multiculturalism or homosexuality is bringing about the downfall of civilisation. I am sure the war could have been avoided had the treaty of Versailles been more measured but that just doesn't explain away locking up children just because they don't fit into your ideals.. Even if I accept that zyklon b was just to treat diseases (I don't), they shouldn't have been locking innocent people away even if the soviets and others were doing it too..
