Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Given that Grant's 'descent into a personal hell' really took off after Doc gave him a 'cure' for his hangover, I'm wond

Given that Grant's 'descent into a personal hell' really took off after Doc gave him a 'cure' for his hangover, I'm wond

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
14 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    didi-5 — 15 years ago(December 02, 2010 12:39 PM)

    That's an interesting point (technically the film was made in early 1970 so even closer to LSD land). Next time I watch the film I'll look out for this - it is a film that gives so much back each time you view it.

    http://www.thewonderfulworldofgarybond.com/

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      rextasy — 15 years ago(February 12, 2011 01:44 PM)

      In the novel, Doc tells Grant the pill contains benzedrine.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        johnwills3 — 13 years ago(January 06, 2013 06:28 PM)

        I was thinking it was speed of some kind
        www.soundcloud.com/professorwobbleswerth

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          marfrie56 — 12 years ago(January 02, 2014 09:06 PM)

          I was thinking it was something benign - not LSD for sure. I don't think the plot hinged on it at all. Doc said "there's nothing in it that's going to hurt you". Not that you can take a statement like that all too seriously. He also said something like "it will give you a little buzz too".
          I took it to be a mild pain killer with an opiate - today's equivalent of Tylenol + codeine or something of that nature.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            willjohn — 12 years ago(January 27, 2014 03:31 PM)

            Methadone was commonly prescribed as a tonic in the 1960s in Australia.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              stevebrouk — 12 years ago(March 15, 2014 06:55 PM)

              The book says benzedrine and in the film he acts like he has taken benzedrine, which is a form of speed/amphetamine.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                somf — 9 years ago(April 30, 2016 12:18 PM)

                I am much more curious about what Pill the critics took that watched this dreck and gave it glowing reviews.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Avuncular — 9 years ago(June 26, 2016 01:57 AM)

                  I agree. Just watched this for the first time after seeing so much praise for it and I didn't think it was particularly good.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    yan-trussart — 9 years ago(July 18, 2016 09:09 AM)

                    Maybe you should stick to benign mush such as "Selma" or "Imitation Game"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      arahman — 1 year ago(July 01, 2024 06:03 AM)

                      So automatically someone who doesn't like this movie must be interested in insipid dreck? What a foolish statement on your part.
                      arahman

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        slim_musky — 7 months ago(August 27, 2025 03:02 AM)

                        No but if someone is unable to appreciate a film that objectively does a fantastic job of representing parts of Australian culture so prominent in reality, yet otherwise absent from the nation's filmography, they are automatically by definition, insipid.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          versace14 — 9 years ago(August 07, 2016 12:19 AM)

                          100% on RT is insanely highand Doc gave him benzies

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            WarpedRecord — 9 years ago(October 26, 2016 11:19 PM)

                            Critics have to endure so many painfully mediocre films that when they see something fresh and original, they can't deny the high. I don't blame them.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0

                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Groups