Did this really warrant an R?

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — General Discussion

---

Kingston26 — 10 years ago(March 27, 2016 09:12 AM)

What's so super scary about it?

[fgadmin]

justinmd — 9 years ago(April 19, 2016 08:14 AM)

The atmosphere of the film

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

svalinanikola — 9 years ago(July 14, 2016 05:20 AM)

^Yep, plus, it's all subjective. What someone finds scary may not be scary to another person.

[fgadmin]

bobwoods — 9 years ago(July 06, 2016 05:25 PM)

I think the biting scene is the only reason why this is R. That part was kinda bloody.

[fgadmin]

moviedude33 — 9 years ago(July 09, 2016 11:03 PM)

It really is the atmosphere, the way it's shot and how overall creepy it is. There wasn't that cheesy, silly cheap jump scares that you always see in movies. And I'm glad because that wasn't the point of it. It tried to be different and it succeeded.

[fgadmin]

jpowers4667 — 9 years ago(August 31, 2016 08:17 PM)

I don't think anything about it warranted an R. However, I was thankful, because that meant less annoying kids in the movie who scream at every obvious jump scare, or talk through the movie.

[fgadmin]

Woodyanders — 9 months ago(June 10, 2025 12:40 AM)

I think the creepy mood and tension was the key reason this movie got an R rating.
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.