Clarence Thomas doesn't:
-
WarrenPeace — 1 year ago(June 24, 2024 04:31 PM)
and yet you still have paki gangs raping thousands of little girls a year and the cops won't do anything about it
This is news to me.
Got a link of an article to show what you're babbling on about here?
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall -
/. — 1 year ago(June 24, 2024 04:33 PM)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal
My password is password -
Rocketman — 1 year ago(June 24, 2024 04:01 PM)
I used to think that but then I found out that my boy Clarence Thomas doesn’t so now I hope that every domestic abuser gets to have a gun. In fact, I’ll take it a step further… they should be given guns the second they leave prison.
Throughout Heaven and Earth, I alone am the honored one. -
WarrenPeace — 1 year ago(June 24, 2024 04:22 PM)
And I'll take your step further and take it a step further….
Give them a gun when they enter prison.
I'm sure they will use them just for protection.
Nothing will go wrong.
Trust me.
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall -
soapbox original gangster — 1 year ago(June 24, 2024 05:34 PM)
in deciding cases, the conservative supreme court justices rely on a theory known as 'original intent" or "originalism", where the present day justices look at dictionaries and word/phrase usages from the time the constitution and subsequent amendments written/ratified.
to my knowledge, the phrases "domestic abuse" and "domestic abuser" did not exist when the second amendment written and passed into law. so i fail to see how the 5 conservatives voted against the right to own/use a gun, since their method of interpretation could not produce that result, if the justices were consistent and faithful to their method.