Criminals have a higher moral compass than police officers.
-
P.Error — 2 years ago(August 10, 2023 06:20 AM)
No on would do the job if they had to offer a criminal an even chance to kill them
Then they shouldn't do the job. That's the point. Only do the job if the suspects are given an equal chance at battle, or else don't do the job.
So when it is already too late? Yeeaaahhhh,
Yes, when it's too late or 50/50.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes
So you admit that cops kill people for little reason, otherwise the stats would be 50/50.
Sounds like you've read 1 too many Batman comics.
No, good guys don't kill otherwise, they're not good guys. Killing someone is the worse sin anyone could do; it's worth than theft, speeding, rape, domestic abuse. If a cop murders an unarmed man at a traffic stop, they're worse than the suspect they just detained, by default. And they will have eternal consequences for that. If you don't see it this way, then I question your morality. If someone robs your house to steal a pack of cigarettes, and you kill them for that, you are infinitely worse than he is.
Police officers should not have the convenience of being able to kill people with a gun. If you can't be a boxer, don't be a cop. If you're not qualified to be a ninja, you can't be a cop. You don't get to be a fat slob and just kill people who don't listen because you don't know how to fight, and don't want to get bruises and cuts on you nor risk injury. That's part of the job if you get to kill people. Broken bones every day. You don't get to kill people then go home with no bruises. Each time they kill someone, it should be a hospital visit for them.
To be a cop, you've got to be skilled in manners to subdue dangerous criminals; you've got to swing nunchucks like a pro; you've got to be a master at martial arts. You simply can't have the convenience of taking a life without putting up a fight with that person.
And the guy whos job it is to enforce the law is not require to gamble his life because someone want to act the fool.
So you admit the suspect can get killed for merely acting a fool, not necessarily trying to kill the officer.
It's one thing for cops to be at an advantage because they're a highly trained assassin. It's quite another to be at an advantage because they're cheating with a gun and don't do any physical body work.
Ban guns.
Two male cops shoot a woman with a metal pipe, lol. Lmao. Muhammad Ali can take out brute George Foreman without weapons and these pigs couldn't take out a woman with a pole, lmao. Murderers. Pussies.
Never lose your desire. -
Soul_Venom — 2 years ago(August 10, 2023 03:58 PM)
an equal chance at battle
You think rapists and murderers deserve an equal chance? It is official. You are most retarded monkey alive.
So you admit that cops kill people for little reason
Again you are retarded. What I said doesnt mean ANYTHING remotely like that. No, what is meant is that when criminal do heinous and stupid things they deserve the consequences.
good guys don't kill otherwise, they're not good guys.
Bullshit! Damn you are such a ****ing retard! The soldiers who killed the Nazi's were good. Hell, they were called the greatest generation.
If you insist that something is an absolute and then an exception is found then you whole theory is invalid. Your theory is total horseshit. Your entire post is utter horseshit.
they're a highly trained assassin.
No dumbass. They are moderately trained civil servants.
No.
You are wrong.
You are retarded.
You are the dumbest poster on the board.
I am done with you.
Fuck off.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
P.Error — 2 years ago(August 11, 2023 03:40 AM)
You think rapists and murderers deserve an equal chance?
When police officers kill an unarmed suspect while responding to a call or during a traffic stop, very rarely are the suspects rapists and murderers, lol. Those are serious crimes; the person of interest is typically apprehended at their residence. These are typically petty crimes, where cop makes initial
You never see Ted Bundy or Alex Murdaugh killed during a rouse at the gas station because they failed to comply. These are often traffic stops, discovering warrants, and so on.
However, the answer would be a resounding yes.
No one should be sniped when they're not expecting it, in other words, caught off guard. No one.
The government has a higher standard. Or they SHOULD have a higher standard.
The reason why most suspects don't end up killing the officer first (and when this happens is usually a white guy with a rifle/shotgun), is they have no intent to kill the officers OR they're outmatched in weaponry and men. BOTH of these are sufficient reasons why officers should not kill anyone unless they're seconds away from dying.
Good guys do not kill. If a cop kills a suspect who just robbed a gas station, the cop is now a killer. The suspect is merely a thief.
The soldiers who killed the Nazi's were good.
There's no evil and morally righteous side in a war. Both have the intent to do good from their perspective. The current culture defines what's good for us. All soldiers, no matter which side, to them, have God on their side.
Never lose your desire. -
Cheeky — 2 years ago(August 11, 2023 03:47 AM)
One crazy guy got pissed at Kyle for putting out a dumpster fire that he had pushed over to a gas station to blow it up
What would you have done if he was chasing you and reached for your gun?
The other guy hit him over the head with his skateboard. Stupid thing to do
If we take the time to see with the heart and not with the mind, we shall see that we are surrounded completely by angels ~ Carlos Santana
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 