good movie.
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film and Television Discussion
darkwarlrd — 16 years ago(October 07, 2009 11:15 AM)
I usually dont take chances on movies I never heard of and always check imdb's message board or userscores. but being an fan of the "haunting" movies, i checked it out anyways with no posts/reviews on this site yet. was very goodending was a mind-***k too, something you kinda thought about during the course of the movie, but wasnt positive about.
-
Golobrad — 16 years ago(October 08, 2009 04:59 AM)
Oh dear, what a waste of time that was. It's very poor. Predictable scene by scene story, hammy acting, ugly photography, lowgrade greenscreen style things going on. Not wasting anymore time with this film in writing more
-
Rooster82 — 16 years ago(October 08, 2009 05:22 PM)
How can you not see that darkwarlrd is an asylum stooge. The person made the account only a few days ago and this is his/her only comment.
Good thing I didn't bother downloading this movie, I knew it was gonna be beep -
zanydeath — 16 years ago(October 09, 2009 12:28 AM)
Amazing,not one scare in the whole film.Very little blood and most of all. dull. Mediocre acting,direction,videography,and who didn't see that telegraphed ending coming? Not as bad as some other Asylum films(Death Racers anyone?) but that's not a recommendation. I'm glad Asylum guru David Micheal Latt has such a tight handle on the quality control. We couldn't have a good scary movie getting out now could we?
-
mrnocal — 16 years ago(October 31, 2009 06:53 PM)
Not the worst horror movie I've ever seenbut miles away from the best. The acting was awfulkind of like acting you'd see on "America's Most Wanted". Oh, waitthe lead actress' 8 credits include her rousing performance as "Halloween House Woman" on "America's Most Wanted". Go figger
The ending was an interesting twist, but not original at allSixth Sense did it waaaaay better. And I agree about the bad blue-screen effects. Very amateurish. Guess that's why this movie was straight to video.
Not worth a rental cost. Wait for it to be free on TV.and be a little whiskified to appreciate it. Of course, whiskification makes even "Saved by the Bell" watchable. :shrugs: -
duffbeer123456 — 16 years ago(December 02, 2009 03:27 PM)
The film itself is beyond boring. the 3-D effect washed out all the color as someone had mentioned before. the acting was the most horrid thing about the movie NOT TO MENTION the bad continuity and editing. the only thing that saved this film was the last 10 minutes. The twist I did not pick up on and was completely surprised. It was nothing like the sixth sense. the sixth sense was enjoyable throught the film this movie sucked anal leakage big time but the ending was good and surpising.
-
jbaker1-2 — 11 months ago(April 19, 2025 03:28 AM)
So did you work on the movie in some capacity, or are you just a troll?
There are 8.2 billion people in the world. 8.19 billion of them have never heard of and don't give a fuck about Charlie Kirk. Get over it.
