Cheeky said...
-
LorqVonRay1999 — 4 months ago(November 16, 2025 10:15 PM)
Cheeky said...
Reyes gave no hint he had anything to do with the Central Park jogger attack. "This was not a guy to have sex as part of a group of people," Sheehan says, trying to explain why he didn't think to ask Reyes about the Central Park jogger. "Totally different M.O. This guy was a hostage taker. He wanted total control, by himself. And as he told me, describing what he did with Lourdes Gonzalez, 'We made love.' Not like 'I fucked her.' It was 'I made love. In the sleeping room.' The park was not his thing. Obviously, now we know he was there. But there was no reason to suspect him in that case at all
On November 1, 1991, Reyes appeared in court for sentencing. When it was his turn to speak, Reyes began by calling Judge Thomas Galligan – the same man who'd presided over the Central Park trials – a "motherfucker," then yelled, "I didn't kill anybody. I'm tired of this shit. The attorneys this court give me don't do nothing for me." Reyes wheeled and punched Siracusa in the head, knocking his lawyer to the ground. "He put a couple of court officers out for a few months – dislocated shoulder, a broken bone," Siracusa says. "He was kicking and screaming the whole way out. I still remember that look on his face, a face out of your nightmares. He totally changed – it was like the devil. He's a pure psychopath
expand
I think we are done here.
Anything else you want to add in your support of rapists and attempted murderers? -
Cheeky — 4 months ago(November 16, 2025 10:18 PM)
LorqVonRay1999 said...
I think we are done here.
Anything else you want to add in your support of rapists and attempted murderers?
I don't support what Reyes did and he did murder someone
If we take the time to see with the heart and not with the mind, we shall see that we are surrounded completely by angels ~ Carlos Santana -
LorqVonRay1999 — 4 months ago(November 16, 2025 10:19 PM)
Cheeky said...
I don't support what Reyes did and he did murder someone
You just support the others who raped and tried to murder.
That's all.
And let's all give a round of applause for the serial rapist who selflessly confessed in order to free five other rapists.
I wonder what he got in return for his confession. -
Cheeky — 4 months ago(November 16, 2025 10:22 PM)
LorqVonRay1999 said...
You just support the others who raped and tried to murder.
That's all.
And let's all give a round of applause for the serial rapist who selflessly confessed in order to free five other rapists.
I wonder what he got in return for his confession.
You can easily look it up
There was no one else there. One set of footprints, one person's DNA
No matter how much you want to believe they're guilty, the evidence isn't there
If we take the time to see with the heart and not with the mind, we shall see that we are surrounded completely by angels ~ Carlos Santana -
LorqVonRay1999 — 4 months ago(November 16, 2025 10:25 PM)
Cheeky said...
You can easily look it up
There was no one else there. One set of footprints, one person's DNA
No matter how much you want to believe they're guilty, the evidence isn't there
Without any doubt I believe they are all guilty. -
Cheeky — 4 months ago(November 16, 2025 10:27 PM)
LorqVonRay1999 said...
Without any doubt I believe they are all guilty.
Without any doubt you are and always will be wrong
If we take the time to see with the heart and not with the mind, we shall see that we are surrounded completely by angels ~ Carlos Santana -
LorqVonRay1999 — 4 months ago(November 16, 2025 10:36 PM)
Cheeky said...
Without any doubt you are and always will be wrong
Your conclusion is based on a spotty confession and some convenient DNA 'evidence'.
Mine is based on the very specific admission of guilt that was carefully recorded as evidence. Not by one of or two of them. By all of them.
You don't seem to realize that the collection of evidence back then was nothing like it is today and you have watched way too much CSI.
The woman was near death and they had to get her to a hospital before any kind of evidence could be collected carefully and most of that would be tainted. It wouldn't be clean evidence.
But somehow they got a pristine piece of DNA that matched the confessor?
And the most damning part? He says he committed it alone, which would have been impossible.
That right there destroys the 'confession'. -
Cheeky — 4 months ago(November 16, 2025 10:39 PM)
LorqVonRay1999 said...
Your conclusion is based on a spotty confession and some convenient DNA 'evidence'.
Mine is based on the very specific admission of guilt that was carefully recorded as evidence. Not by one of or two of them. By all of them.
You don't seem to realize that the collection of evidence back then was nothing like it is today and you have watched way too much CSI.
The woman was near death and they had to get her to a hospital before any kind of evidence could be collected carefully and most of that would be tainted. It wouldn't be clean evidence.
But somehow they got a pristine piece of DNA that matched the confessor?
And the most damning part? He says he committed it alone, which would have been impossible.
That right there destroys the 'confession'.
expand
The DNA was on her sock
And, no, it wasn't impossible. He bludgeoned her on the head with a rock
You don't even know the details of the case but believe the false confessions
If we take the time to see with the heart and not with the mind, we shall see that we are surrounded completely by angels ~ Carlos Santana -
LorqVonRay1999 — 4 months ago(November 16, 2025 10:41 PM)
Cheeky said...
The DNA was on her sock
And, no, it wasn't impossible. He bludgeoned her on the head with a rock
You don't even know the details of the case but believe the false confessions
Oh come on.
She was obviously held down by more than one person while the others beat and raped her.
One person did not do all that. Unless it's Superman. -
Cheeky — 4 months ago(November 16, 2025 10:47 PM)
LorqVonRay1999 said...
Oh come on.
She was obviously held down by more than one person while the others beat and raped her.
One person did not do all that. Unless it's Superman.
He knocked her down with a tree branch when she was running
Dragged her and raped her. When she tried to run he caught her and busted her head open with a heavy rock
Did you read about him putting two men in the hospital at his court sentencing?
If we take the time to see with the heart and not with the mind, we shall see that we are surrounded completely by angels ~ Carlos Santana -
LorqVonRay1999 — 4 months ago(November 16, 2025 10:51 PM)
Cheeky said...
He knocked her down with a tree branch when she was running
Dragged her and raped her. When she tried to run he caught her and busted her head open with a heavy rock
Did you read about him putting two men in the hospital at his court sentencing?
No, but I do not believe any of what you just said.
Not a word. Other than he might have been there when this all happened.
But I also believe the others were there.
Knowing the character of a career rapist WHY would he confess?
The right thing to do? LOL
I am fine with the admission he was there. That he acted alone is laughable. -
Cheeky — 4 months ago(November 16, 2025 11:19 PM)
LorqVonRay1999 said...
No, but I do not believe any of what you just said.
Not a word. Other than he might have been there when this all happened.
But I also believe the others were there.
Knowing the character of a career rapist WHY would he confess?
The right thing to do? LOL
I am fine with the admission he was there. That he acted alone is laughable.
But I also believe the others were there
Where's the DNA? Why is there only one set of footprints?
You believe the evidence that isn't there and disbelieve the evidence that is there
If we take the time to see with the heart and not with the mind, we shall see that we are surrounded completely by angels ~ Carlos Santana -
LorqVonRay1999 — 4 months ago(November 17, 2025 01:11 AM)
Cheeky said...
But I also believe the others were there
Where's the DNA? Why is there only one set of footprints?
You believe the evidence that isn't there and disbelieve the evidence that is there
Again, you are applying what you have learned from CSI.
The collection and storage of any physical evidence, especially DNA, was notoriously unreliable.
So I don't trust that evidence at all. Any evidence would have been tainted. And the fact they somehow matched the DNA is more than suspicious.
What did this guy get in return for his confession? It wasn't done out of the goodness of his serial rapist heart. -
Cheeky — 4 months ago(November 17, 2025 01:29 AM)
LorqVonRay1999 said...
Again, you are applying what you have learned from CSI.
The collection and storage of any physical evidence, especially DNA, was notoriously unreliable.
So I don't trust that evidence at all. Any evidence would have been tainted. And the fact they somehow matched the DNA is more than suspicious.
What did this guy get in return for his confession? It wasn't done out of the goodness of his serial rapist heart.
Then I guess that means no convictions are valid because the DNA can't be trusted
You really are reaching
DNA = Bad
Coerced confessions = Good
You believe what they said in their false confessions
The prosecutor tainted them when she showed Korey Wise photos from the crime scene
If he was there why did she have to help him with his answers? Coached!
But, it makes no difference what you believe
If we take the time to see with the heart and not with the mind, we shall see that we are surrounded completely by angels ~ Carlos Santana -
LorqVonRay1999 — 4 months ago(November 17, 2025 01:50 AM)
Cheeky said...
Then I guess that means no convictions are valid because the DNA can't be trusted
You really are reaching
DNA = Bad
Coerced confessions = Good
You believe what they said in their false confessions
The prosecutor tainted them when she showed Korey Wise photos from the crime scene
If he was there why did she have to help him with his answers? Coached!
But, it makes no difference what you believe
expand
No, DNA is good. If it is properly collected and preserved. Both of which I do not trust in this case. The focal point of your entire case.
The confessions were only 'coerced' from your POV. Not mine. Those were specific confessions. Not general ones.
You want to give black people preferential treatment. That is the whole issue here. If they were white you would only care if the victim were black. Otherwise you would ignore it like you do all the other crimes committed by black people.
Which is why we have such a massive crime problem in areas where we have high black populations.
You continue to ignore it and it keeps getting worse.
By letting these five rapists go you have only hurt the black community.
Most of those crimes? They are committed against other black people. -
Cheeky — 4 months ago(November 17, 2025 01:56 AM)
LorqVonRay1999 said...
No, DNA is good. If it is properly collected and preserved. Both of which I do not trust in this case. The focal point of your entire case.
The confessions were only 'coerced' from your POV. Not mine. Those were specific confessions. Not general ones.
You want to give black people preferential treatment. That is the whole issue here. If they were white you would only care if the victim were black. Otherwise you would ignore it like you do all the other crimes committed by black people.
Which is why we have such a massive crime problem in areas where we have high black populations.
You continue to ignore it and it keeps getting worse.
By letting these five rapists go you have only hurt the black community.
Most of those crimes? They are committed against other black people.
expand
You don't know me
I hate the black women who abused little boys. I posted a photo not too long ago of one
I hate Dayonte Resiles who murdered a woman in her home while he was there to commit a robbery. He has an Instagram page and I tell his supporters what scum he is
I just don't like dirty cops and I don't like seeing anyone go to prison for something they didn't do
You're the one with a bias against blacks, clearly, and you judge others as having a bias
If we take the time to see with the heart and not with the mind, we shall see that we are surrounded completely by angels ~ Carlos Santana -
LorqVonRay1999 — 4 months ago(November 17, 2025 02:00 AM)
Cheeky said...
You don't know me
I hate the black women who abused little boys. I posted a photo not too long ago of one
I hate Dayonte Resiles who murdered a woman in her home while he was there to commit a robbery. He has an Instagram page and I tell his supporters what scum he is
I just don't like dirty cops and I don't like seeing anyone go to prison for something they didn't do
You're the one with a bias against blacks, clearly, and you judge others as having a bias
expand
You don't like dirty cops.
But you like serial rapists. -
Cheeky — 4 months ago(November 17, 2025 02:12 AM)
LorqVonRay1999 said...
You don't like dirty cops.
But you like serial rapists.
Piss off, idiot
If we take the time to see with the heart and not with the mind, we shall see that we are surrounded completely by angels ~ Carlos Santana -
AnthonySocksss — 4 months ago(November 15, 2025 08:10 PM)
Shutup republitard
Melton1 Wanted for Pedophilia:
https://i.ibb.co/6cnPmJVr/IMG-0830.jpg
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/Zjxk307CND0
