Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Outdated or Unfunny??

Outdated or Unfunny??

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
38 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    truegrit1962 — 16 years ago(January 21, 2010 04:54 AM)

    unfunny.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #16

      IMDb User

      This message has been deleted.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        puschit-1 — 16 years ago(July 31, 2009 04:13 AM)

        Maybe it just isn't meant to be an all-out comedy!? It's also a story about rich vs. poor, about the power of money and what great amounts of it can do to you and of course it was a story about friendship and the things in life that are really important.
        The story itself is timeless and thus can't ever be "outdated". In fact this is about the 4th or 5th remake, the original being a silent movie from 1914!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #18

          flashpenguin86 — 16 years ago(January 09, 2010 06:35 AM)

          The message of the movie is: "To be careful what you wish for because it might come true!" and "In the end, the best and only friend you can rely on is yourself".
          I havent seen the movie in years, but it still stays with me. I dont think it was supposed to be a slap-stick, but a touching and endearing film about finding oneself. I thought it was well acted and Pryor and Candy definitely hit it off.
          I hope you gave it another try.
          House: Hey I can be a jerk to people I haven't slept with. I am that good.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #19

            kedrell — 15 years ago(December 06, 2010 01:06 PM)

            1914? Even that was just an adaption of the original 1902 book of the same name. In the book, he has a year to blow the money(1 million there to get 7 million) but he not only can't tell anyone WHY he has to spend it, but he can't even just tell anyone that he's trying to spend it all away without the WHY. He basically has to keep the entire thing a secret.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              rickb69 — 12 years ago(October 17, 2013 04:50 AM)

              I don't think the 1902 book was to spend $1million to get $7million. The 1945 movie version was $1million to get $7 million. I don't think there were millionaires in 1902, maybe there were but, that would be like a BILLIONAIRE by today's standards.
              Charles Chaplin Making a Living (1914) $150/week

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                matt-whittall — 15 years ago(June 25, 2010 11:24 PM)

                its one of my fav pryor movies, i mean the part where he first meets ms drakes fiance and they leave, and he goes, "now that was a real beep or something to that effect. perfect comedic timing.
                now close your eyes and picture this mesopotamia meets busby berkeley.
                ITS A KNOCKOUT!
                i mean come on thats just plain funny.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  dboone1025 — 15 years ago(August 07, 2010 02:55 AM)

                  It's not laugh out loud funny, but its a good character movie.
                  "America, what a country, love it!" Haha. Between the cab driver, mrs drake, the crooked lawyers, rupert horn. Pryor wasn't hysterical, but he gave good energy. Stephen Collins. Jerry Orbach. I think the characters save the movie from complete disaster.
                  I can quote this movie, more than other 80's flicks. I think morty king, king of the mimics was hysterical. Luther. The movie is sort of a case study in who you run into if you make a lot of money. The accountant. He was pretty funny.
                  A lot of little people and situations that add up to make it funny.
                  The way he spent the money was pretty good, like the stamp. Also the music, and soundtrack were good. A solid 6/10.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    RobBase086-1 — 15 years ago(January 28, 2011 10:51 PM)

                    This movie is still comical to watch in my opinion and I watched it the other night for the first time in years! I cannot remember the last time I saw this on cable TV. That might have been back in the lat 80's I believe when FOX use to show movies like this in the weekend afternoon matinee. Now all they want to show is other crap on there. I mean they still show movies but nothing like this though.
                    Dedicated to USA UP ALL NIGHT and the fans!
                    www.usaupallnight.webs.com/

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      WarpedRecord — 15 years ago(February 02, 2011 11:49 AM)

                      This movie has been remade so many times that it was bound to run out of steam sooner or later. This feels like a '40s film more than an '80s film. Really, it originated much earlier. Still, the cast is very pleasant, and I was never bored though I chuckled only once or twice. 6/10 stars.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #25

                        mcfly-31 — 14 years ago(June 01, 2011 01:15 PM)

                        There's no way a story of inheriting money and being forced to spend it to inherit more could ever get stale. I think the OP was asking if he thought the humor was outdated. I don't even know if it was current when it came out. The humor in the film is more of a preference for whoever is watching it. As Dboone mentioned, there's a lot of smaller roles that get big laughs (for me, anyway). Rick Moranis' mimic guy ("Spike, choke this guy!"), the pissed off bookey, smart-ass photographer, Spike's consternation at everything ("Chuck Fleming??!!!"), Collins as the kiss ass yuppie ("You think I came down with the last drop of rain" is still a line I use to this day). Pryor's energy level is probably the best it is in any of his films.
                        Most of all, just the premise makes it a classic for me. For a light comedy to actually draw you in to the conditions, stipulations, and pitfalls of ending up in this situation, is unheard of. So, no, the actual laughs in this film are not why I've always loved it. How much humor can you derive out of a spending situation (you're sort of shoehorned into one kind of joke)?. You'd need the non-sequitirs of the random characters (iceberg guy, Moranis, Orbach's crotchety manager).
                        "If I had ya where I wanted ya, they'd be pumpin your ass full of formaldehyde!"

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #26

                          wiiztec — 14 years ago(August 22, 2011 11:36 PM)

                          I just finished watching this for the first time a half hour ago and there were several moments that I laughed out loud at

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #27

                            rob599999 — 14 years ago(December 25, 2011 04:22 AM)

                            It is a shame that you feel this film was no good just because it didn't have many funny parts to it. I too never found it all that funny but I did love it, it was a great story line and good to watch. Does a film have to be funny for it to be good?
                            I don't know if you are from England or not but people said the same thing of a classic episode of Only Fools and Horses - To Hull and Back. Some people moaned it was not good as it wasn't funny, but it was just a brilliant storyline and it is a shame they cannot see that.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #28

                              Phil_Cassidy — 14 years ago(March 01, 2012 05:48 AM)

                              Neither.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #29

                                13tongimp — 13 years ago(May 19, 2012 09:35 PM)

                                It isn't outdated and it is absolutely not unfunny. It isn't a lol a minute type of movie but it has a ton of charm and the two leads (Pryor & Candy) seem to be just having a ton of fun with their roles. There is something so endearing about the movie that makes you just smile and that is more than enough for me. I have fond memories of watching this on HBO back in the 80's and just watched it recently. It still holds up for all the same reasons as far as I'm concerned.
                                http://www.13tongimp.com/
                                http://omegafutureworld.blogspot.com/

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #30

                                  AussieEighties — 12 years ago(May 29, 2013 09:48 PM)

                                  It's a little bit of both. Unfunny for me but also outdated.
                                  I love 80s comedies usually but couldn't get into this one. The problem is that they have an interesting idea/story for a movie like this but there's no comedy or comedic moments surrounding it. the 80s had some pretty out there ideas, unique ones which is what I love most about 80s movies but this ain't all that special.
                                  it's outdated because if it were made and released today, it wouldn't attract audiences. the 80s however all these types of movies they had were new and unique, and the people back then were probably more entertained by such ideas like this. it's a simple story, but not engaging.
                                  I was quite surprised this has more then a 6 outta 10 on Imdb actually.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    fgadmin
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #31

                                    Pilgrim07 — 11 years ago(April 26, 2014 10:41 PM)

                                    I was around when it was released - your reaction was the general reaction of audiences in '85 - it was a dud. This was the first Pryor film from 1976 onward where I felt it wasn't worth watching for Pryor alone - it was the first time I felt Pryor was truly weighed down by the flatness of the material.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      fgadmin
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #32

                                      emuri99198 — 11 years ago(December 10, 2014 06:16 PM)

                                      Just a humorous situation, but I find the whole movie more confusing than funny.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • F Offline
                                        F Offline
                                        fgadmin
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #33

                                        Prismark10 — 11 years ago(December 29, 2014 09:10 AM)

                                        The film rather failed as s comedy but it was still an enjoyable film.
                                        Its that man again!!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          fgadmin
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #34

                                          bbally81 — 11 years ago(January 18, 2015 10:21 AM)

                                          I've seen this film once a long time ago I remember enjoying it although not finding laugh out loud funny, but it does have a quote that I enjoy to use whenever there'a political election between 2 candidates I don't support I go "None of the above", love that line.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups