this is probably the most boring and pretentious movie,
-
JaneSchmo — 17 years ago(November 02, 2008 08:33 PM)
Oh man, you have NOT seen Aguirre or Fitzcarraldo! Or a dozen other Herzog films.
They move at a snail's pace. Like watching paint dry. Pauline Kael commented that the pacing was so terrible in Fitzcarraldo that it put her into a brain-numbed stupor.
Just DEADLY.
By Herzog's standards, this one was very fast! -
ejc15 — 11 years ago(February 16, 2015 07:20 AM)
The first time I watched it I fell asleep. Or worse, I fought sleep. Hated it. In the morning when I woke up I tried it again. Glutton I suppose.
It is a frightening movie and the pace is part of what makes it frightening. Probably the best "dracula/Nosferatu" movie I have seen.
By the way, I am not a fan of Herzog. -
pater-tenebrarum — 10 years ago(October 25, 2015 01:19 AM)
Different people fall asleep to different movies. It took me four years to finally watch all of Memento (which I thought was an excellent movie after I finally managed to to it, btw.). Funny enough, I always fell asleep during the same scene (a meeting in a Cafe). By contrast, I have been able to stay awake during many other movies that at first glance appear to be more likely to induce sleep.
-
AlexeiKaramazov — 17 years ago(December 08, 2008 04:36 PM)
"I'd like to see more Werzog actually now."
Please do. I also just saw Woyzeck and I felt that was wonderful at a slightly faster pace.
Phantom der Nacht was utterly mesmerizing in places, such as Harker's journey to the castle (perfect music for those scenes) and basically whenever Kinski was on the screen. Yes, it was slow in places, but I liked the twist on the ending quite a bit.
Did anyone else jump on the first night of Harker's visit when Dracula suddenly became aggressive and backed him all the way over to the fireplace? Kinski really had those unsettling movements down pat. -
JellyFish19 — 10 years ago(April 21, 2015 05:06 PM)
Really? How so? I though this was just perfect. Very atmospheric, full of unnerving tension and images, never a dull moment. Enjoyed it more than the original Nosferatu or both Draculas (1931/1958).
My only complaint would be that annoying laughing character, who feels ridiculously out of place somehow. Luckily he doesn't have that much screen-time. -
Falconeer — 10 years ago(July 21, 2015 08:11 AM)
Are you kidding??? You must have the attention span of a gnat. Were you texting while watching it? Every scene in this beautiful film was hypnotic, and eerie, and gorgeous. And it was no "slower" than any decent retelling of the Dracula legend. I suggest you lose your fake, pseudo-artist friends. If they felt that way about this movie, they are clearly art posers. I bet these pretentious dickheads finger paint with their own excrement and think it's art..
"IMdB; where 14 year olds can act like jaded 40 year old critics' -
tpupkin — 10 years ago(October 18, 2015 03:21 AM)
The thing with Herzog is that he can be brilliant one scene and then have two scenes in which he either paid no attention or just left the assembly cut with no trimming. Or he'll take a really long time to make a point you picked up on in the first 3 seconds. It can be pretty maddening.
I hated this when I first saw it 20+ years ago on a dark VHS transfer and crummy TV. Now in HD it's really gorgeous and Kinski and Adjani are arresting, but you could cut a half hour without losing anything great. -
tavaresmd — 9 years ago(August 31, 2016 09:27 PM)
I love this movie, but if I am in any way sleepy before watching it, it will probably put me to sleep. It's not because it's boring, it has a very ethereal, dreamlike, almost soothing quality to it.
The Hardest Thing In This World Is To Live In It