Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Better than the second? Yes or no?

Better than the second? Yes or no?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
13 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film and Television Discussion


    gpapa1998-24-961204 — 14 years ago(July 05, 2011 02:52 AM)

    I think it was better than the second.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      csweetleaf2 — 14 years ago(July 07, 2011 05:33 PM)

      Yes it was cause it had more laughs, chases and I loved the chemistry between Buford and Junior, it wasn't as dark and depressing like the second movie was which made the movie a lot better.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        bunkerforever — 14 years ago(March 26, 2012 01:48 AM)

        While the second one might've been a better made movie, part 3 was funnier in my opinion.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          jasoncampbell05 — 14 years ago(March 27, 2012 12:08 AM)

          I would much rather watch Part 3 over Part 2.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            BPD1586 — 14 years ago(April 06, 2012 02:58 PM)

            Yesthe second one was a little boring. Second one should've continued off where the first one ended showing them driving from Atlanta to Boston for clam chowder, I wonder how that turned out.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              howardgrantrulz — 13 years ago(April 17, 2012 07:38 PM)

              When I was little and saw all 3 - I thought 2 was the best due to the cars vs trucks scene at the endhowever, as I've gotten older: obviously Part 1 is the best, hands down.
              But Part 3 is slightly better than Part 2 - due to Gleason's comments - some of them are hilarious. You know what's always made me laugh in Part 3, perhaps you people can comment as well on this.
              when they are trying to get out of MIami with the shark on the roof - there's a guy who walks by and says 'hey, you want some food for your fish?' and Buford flips him off.I LOVE that scene - its is funny as hell, I don't know why - but it is
              as is the 'not if you were sugar ray leonard' comment.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                gerard-21 — 13 years ago(June 24, 2012 01:37 PM)

                Agreed, 3 is funnier than 2. Even though 2 had Burt Reynolds and a higher budget is was completely bloated and boring and pretty much rendered inane by Dom Deluise. 3, while not a great movie either, is very breezy and enjoyable.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  dnasty68 — 13 years ago(March 16, 2013 11:57 AM)

                  I'm glad I'm not alone in thinking this.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Traianus — 12 years ago(December 11, 2013 08:57 AM)

                    One time just for the heck of it I watched all three films with a group of people who hadn't seen any of them and knew very little about them. They were a pretty objective and intelligent group. By far and overwhelmingly, they thought the first film was the best. By far and overwhelmingly, they thought Part 3 was better than Part 2. They liked Part 3 and thought Part 2 was lame and unentertaining.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Vega_Lyra — 12 years ago(April 03, 2014 12:54 PM)

                      Even though it was one of the first films I rememeber seeing (and in a drive in movie theater no less), Part 2 is my least favorite of the films. Part 3 is head and shoulders above 2, even though I much prefer the 2nd generation Firebird design to that crummy 3rd generation car.
                      The 2nd film just seemed dull and boring for the most part. The 3rd film actually had some good lines in it and Reed did the best he could. Colleen Camp is a knockout as well which doesn't hurt.
                      Conquer your fear, and I promise you, you will conquer death.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        IMDb User

                        This message has been deleted.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          gpapa1998-24-961204 — 10 years ago(June 06, 2015 03:30 AM)

                          Do you think that Boris was more evil than Serleena? Why or why not?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Woodyanders — 8 months ago(July 30, 2025 12:24 AM)

                            I prefer the second one over this mess.
                            You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0

                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Groups