Help!
-
Bitter_Almonds — 20 years ago(February 10, 2006 02:33 PM)
So, you're basically saying that you viewed a film with children having sex. Saying it is repulsive is a given, but you watch movies with children having sex? Sounds inherently repulsive in itself.
Do The Mussolini! Headkick! -
Bitter_Almonds — 20 years ago(February 10, 2006 06:13 PM)
[lolz]You obviously don't work with the law or are part of any of those group of people because you're writing about "borderline slander" over a medium exclusively done in writing. True learned people don't mismatch "slander" and "libel".[/lolz] lol at you again for having watched a movie showing children having sex and admitting it. Of course, this being the intarweb, you can admit to it and nobody has to know. I mean, in real life this is just as repulsive as the ones you accuse of producing it.
Do The Mussolini! Headkick! -
jbaker1-2 — 6 years ago(June 17, 2019 02:58 AM)
True learned people don't type childish bullshit like "lolz" either…
There are 8.2 billion people in the world. 8.19 billion of them have never heard of and don't give a fuck about Charlie Kirk. Get over it. -
haileybaron — 12 years ago(May 15, 2013 09:12 AM)
plus you spelled naive and liable wrong, so i'm just going to "ass-u-me" you're a 4 year old
Hahaha Nope.
It's spelled LIBEL
YOU are spelling it wrong genius.
You're liable to spell libel wrong because you're a dumbass.
Get it? -
japonaliya — 19 years ago(April 30, 2006 10:39 PM)
"The movie "Kids" does not contain under age sex scene's(I know, I have seen it) and can be purchased full uncut at K-Mart for pete's sake" (quote)
BS!!! The first scene in Kids shows a 12 year old having intercourse in her bedroomit shocked the hell out of me, much more than Maladolecenza because it seemed REAL, not like a student art film.
As far as Maladolecenza goesporn or not..it is available for free download on many torrent sitesuncut with subs in DVD quality.
So go see it for your self. IMO once is enough! -
Dismenot — 19 years ago(July 25, 2006 04:21 PM)
Hi-
Were you just stating your opinion, or were you expecting me to answer and explain how sadly misinformed you are?
btw, you missed Pheobe Cates in Paradise, she was 17 and showed T&A both, with a few milliseconds of bush tossed in.
What's next? Are they going to go arrest the artist who painted the famous Coppertone ad? After all, I'm sure there's someone, somewhere who gets turned by looking at it
The above is the only paragraph in your post with any merit, if you want me to show you what's wrong with the rest, let me know and I'll oblige.
An HSX Baron -
Dismenot — 19 years ago(July 25, 2006 08:40 PM)
Or the part about the US having more laws pertaining to sex and sexual activities than it does for killing someone?
Um, America has more
traffic
laws than both of those put together, so like, what your point?
Next irrelevant 'fact'?
An HSX Baron -
Dismenot — 19 years ago(July 26, 2006 05:01 PM)
Why? Like much of your original reply, your question has absolutely nothing to do with the movie.
I have no desire to have my posts deleted for posting off-topic.
So you don't like the laws around here, fine, if you want to debate the morals of America, then please do so in the soapbox where it belongs.
Otherwise stay on-topic, personal rants don't belong on movie boards.
An HSX Baron -
person64389 — 19 years ago(July 29, 2006 04:59 PM)
two points dismenot, firstly, in the thing dated may 1, you state that downloading this thing would be illegal due to piracy as well as its being child pornography (not having seen it, I make no judgement as to whether it actually is child pornography). don't those two obviously conflict? if the thing is illegal child pornography, how can it be protected by intellectual property laws?
secondly, how can you suggest that the morals of some americans should be writen into americas laws? I don't care if 99.9% of americans find a particular action morally repulsive, if thats all they've got against it, then there should be no law against it. this is citizenship 101.