Why haven’t COLORIZATION and CGI (CRAPPY Generated Images)…

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Soapbox

---

— 5 months ago(October 30, 2025 03:17 AM)

both been PERFECTED by NOW?!
They SHOULD also call
CGI
,
SGI
for
SHITTY Generated Images
!!
I can UNDERSTAND why
AI
isn’t PERFECTED yet, but the other two??
COLORIZATION
is either WASHED OUT (DULL) or the color/s is/are TOO BRIGHT!! It’s NEVER just right. Some colors are obvious as to what they are, while others are CLEARLY guesses by those doing the process.
CGI
looks FAKE and
COLORIZATION
looks CARTOONISH!!!
“Call a SPADE, a SPADE; and a TRANNY, a TRANNY, or an IT!!!”.
"THAT'S SOME BAD
SHIT
,
HARRY
!".

[fgadmin]

Chicxulub — 5 months ago(October 30, 2025 03:27 AM)

They saw that the masses would settle for the cartoon-looking slop, so why bother.

[fgadmin]

— 5 months ago(October 30, 2025 05:18 AM)

“Call a SPADE, a SPADE; and a TRANNY, a TRANNY, or an IT!!!”.
"THAT'S SOME BAD
SHIT
,
HARRY
!".

[fgadmin]

Lg21x — 4 months ago(November 03, 2025 07:04 PM)

It's possible to make near photorealistic CGI but it takes a lot of skill and manhours, which means a lot of money, so studios opt for "good enough" a lot of the time.