This Daredevil is better than any DC live action character attempt EVER!
-
Uberiffic — 9 years ago(October 11, 2016 04:47 PM)
Now they added a Superman to Supergirl and Daredevil STILL destroys that CW cheese-a-thon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gCBiJ3QJnk&feature=player_embedded -
bond_98 — 9 years ago(October 11, 2016 10:31 PM)
And yet nobody gave enough of a Sh!t about Matt to give him another shot at a new movie. So hes stuck on a none-network that will only draw maybe 5 million viewers an episode. So i guess that says something. I mean regardless of what you might think of the MCU movies. Marvel not making billions of these lame-ass cheap TV Shows and most people aren't even watching them either. These Netflix Shows are just a graveyard for characters Marvel dose not give two sh!ts about.
-
ninthcentury — 9 years ago(February 07, 2017 11:05 AM)
Complex does not always mean better. Look at Oliver Queen and his complicated mess of a backstory as written for his showbecause some fool in the "Arrow" planning room didn't think "Malcolm Merlin, you killed my father. Prepare to die" was
complex
enough to carry a show.Because supporting your thesis is tough, but throwing adjectives is easy. -
-
assumedkilla — 10 years ago(March 21, 2016 06:50 PM)
It's easily the best thing in the MCU, but I prefer BB and TDK to it. It's fine if someone disagrees, but you're talking like your opinion is fact lol. In general, I would say TV is a more interesting medium than film, if a HUGE budget isn't needed.
I never saved anything for the swim back. -
beat — 10 years ago(March 27, 2016 08:29 AM)
Honestly, both DD seasons are better than anything any DC character has ever delivered and that includes film. These two DD seasons are like 12 hour movies and BETTER than Nolan's Batman trilogy which is DC's only real contender. Yes, that includes TDK.
i guess it is if you prefer badly written and very tv-looking stuff over a real movie. -
Mr_Recchia — 9 years ago(February 05, 2017 09:20 PM)
i guess it is if you prefer badly written and very tv-looking stuff over a real movie.
Except the quality of writing and cinematography in Daredevil is leagues ahead of anything seen in Nolan's Dark Knight movies. None of the characters in his movies, and I mean none of them, come off like real people at any point in time. The Daredevil characters do. That's why I care for them a hell of a lot more. The moment I realized that every line of dialogue coming out of Rhas Al Ghul's mouth was theatrical and over dramatized to the extreme, the illusion of a real person was broken. I knew I was looking at a mouth piece for the film's themes, and I ceased to care.
There's a phrase for that. It's called bad writing, and Nolan's overpraised mediocrities have a ton of it.
What does an Italian say when he moves to Canada? I use to live in a boot. -
ba_bam_bam — 9 years ago(June 25, 2016 12:37 PM)
Face facts, Daredevil is next level stuff. Honestly, both DD seasons are better than anything any DC character has ever delivered and that includes film. These two DD seasons are like 12 hour movies and BETTER than Nolan's Batman trilogy which is DC's only real contender. Yes, that includes TDK.
DD is simply more complex and offers so much more depth. That's the nature of the source material and I guess that is an unfair advantage.
DD and Marvel's source material is simply richer and more complex so why wouldn't a true adaptation be superior to anything the one dimensional DC source material can manufacture?
That is the absolute truth without question.